I would argue China only went to war with Japan due to international sabatogue
It's true that Japan, China, and Russia had various territory disputes in the past, but WW2 was particularly bad
In the 20th century globalist shill Franklin Roosevelt demanded that Chiang Kai Shek allow Communists in government or lose all US economic and military aid. Chiang had an emergency meeting with his generals who said to commit an all out attack on Mao's forces and sent them on their 1000 mile march into Soviet territory, thinking if they were no longer in China that would negate his demand but it just made FDR even more angry.
The 671th Congressional Investigation discovered that the Institute of Pacific Relations was a hotbed for globalist infiltration sending globalists like Solomon Adler to back up Harry Dexter, with their plan to crush Chiang's economy by illegally fixing the price of gold and silver which they later had to legalize. Solomon Adler used US Embassies to pass out propaganda to the Chinese calling Chiang a "Dictator for not allowing ALL Chinese representation in government" (Denying Communists) and the only way to fix it is to side with Mao against Chiang and secure US Economic/Military aid again.
The media also didn't report it when Mao's bandits attacked Japanese controlled Manchuria (which was a big deal because without their mainland assets Japan would have to go back to being third world again unable to industrialize), so they had an emergency military meeting and decided that Chiang was not capable of dealing with the Communist extremists threatening Japanese resource lines in Manchuria. Chiang and most Chinese understandably had hostility to Japan and refused Japanese help in containing communist bandits, since he saw that as the first step to China becoming a vassal of Japan. Japan understandably decided they would deal with the Communists themselves and re secure their resource lines
Much like how Japan attacked US in WW2 after Roosevelt oil embargo sanctions, which crippled Japan's infrastructure
So these globalist networks essentially sparked the Sino-Japanese battle in WW2 IMO
Western media portrayed all Japanese actions as Japanese Imperialism/Expansionism when the reality was Japan was desperate, resource starved (by economic sanctions done in a Holomdor style) also totally neglected to mention the Soviet troop/ tank presence in China supporting Mao.
The book "Allied wartime diplomacy: a pattern in Poland" gives a good overview on British/Anglo disinformation and how it was historically used to cover up and justify Anglo and Bolshevik and communist atrocities, as it cites many letters between British intelligence officials:
(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crucified_Soldier) as examples of how the AngloZio press lied historically;
Anyways these "globalists" later lost control over communism/socialist groups by the 1950's, which is why many new "neoliberal" styled progressives (or "demsocs") started creating a liberal counter in subverting the communist/socialist groups in Eurasia
Gloria Steinem is one such CIA neoliberal asset who subverted communist groups in Europe in the 1950's
Many NGO's were involved in faking the Tiananmen Square "massacre" just like many of these internationalist groups including George Soros were involved in economically collapsing the USSR
The Tiananmen Square "massacre" is a lie used to incite anti-chinese sentiment by portraying their government/culture as barbaric, so we have a pretext for sanctions and possible war
It's true that Japan, China, and Russia had various territory disputes in the past, but WW2 was particularly bad
In the 20th century globalist shill Franklin Roosevelt demanded that Chiang Kai Shek allow Communists in government or lose all US economic and military aid. Chiang had an emergency meeting with his generals who said to commit an all out attack on Mao's forces and sent them on their 1000 mile march into Soviet territory, thinking if they were no longer in China that would negate his demand but it just made FDR even more angry.
The 671th Congressional Investigation discovered that the Institute of Pacific Relations was a hotbed for globalist infiltration sending globalists like Solomon Adler to back up Harry Dexter, with their plan to crush Chiang's economy by illegally fixing the price of gold and silver which they later had to legalize. Solomon Adler used US Embassies to pass out propaganda to the Chinese calling Chiang a "Dictator for not allowing ALL Chinese representation in government" (Denying Communists) and the only way to fix it is to side with Mao against Chiang and secure US Economic/Military aid again.
The media also didn't report it when Mao's bandits attacked Japanese controlled Manchuria (which was a big deal because without their mainland assets Japan would have to go back to being third world again unable to industrialize), so they had an emergency military meeting and decided that Chiang was not capable of dealing with the Communist extremists threatening Japanese resource lines in Manchuria. Chiang and most Chinese understandably had hostility to Japan and refused Japanese help in containing communist bandits, since he saw that as the first step to China becoming a vassal of Japan. Japan understandably decided they would deal with the Communists themselves and re secure their resource lines
Much like how Japan attacked US in WW2 after Roosevelt oil embargo sanctions, which crippled Japan's infrastructure
So these globalist networks essentially sparked the Sino-Japanese battle in WW2 IMO
Western media portrayed all Japanese actions as Japanese Imperialism/Expansionism when the reality was Japan was desperate, resource starved (by economic sanctions done in a Holomdor style) also totally neglected to mention the Soviet troop/ tank presence in China supporting Mao.
The book "Allied wartime diplomacy: a pattern in Poland" gives a good overview on British/Anglo disinformation and how it was historically used to cover up and justify Anglo and Bolshevik and communist atrocities, as it cites many letters between British intelligence officials:
"Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the "corpse factory", the "mutilated belgian babies", and the "crucified canadians"."At least SOME japanese atrocities happened (like nanking) but there is at least some disinformation atrocity propaganda as well
"Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the ministry.
Your experession of belief in such may convince others
I am, sir, your obedient servant,
H. Hewet, assistant secretary"
(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crucified_Soldier) as examples of how the AngloZio press lied historically;
During World War II the story was used by the Nazis as an example of British propaganda.There are several other cases of made up fake news propaganda the Nazis cited from WW1 like German troops "mutilating Belgian babies" and other bullshit
Anyways these "globalists" later lost control over communism/socialist groups by the 1950's, which is why many new "neoliberal" styled progressives (or "demsocs") started creating a liberal counter in subverting the communist/socialist groups in Eurasia
Gloria Steinem is one such CIA neoliberal asset who subverted communist groups in Europe in the 1950's
Many NGO's were involved in faking the Tiananmen Square "massacre" just like many of these internationalist groups including George Soros were involved in economically collapsing the USSR
The Tiananmen Square "massacre" is a lie used to incite anti-chinese sentiment by portraying their government/culture as barbaric, so we have a pretext for sanctions and possible war
The response from the West then was to demonize the Chinese government and to impose economic and military sanctions which in many cases exist to the present day. A recent release of a diplomatic telegram from then-US Ambassador to China, James E. Lilley, to Washington sheds new light on what really happened that June 4. According to the mainstream Western version of events, thousands of Chinese university students began their sit-in protest demanding democracy and transparency from the Communist government in April and into May 1989 in the huge Tiananmen Square, directly across from the historic Forbidden City edifice in central Beijing. They defiantly faced off against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army. On May 20, 1989, the CCP imposed martial law and ordered truckloads of soldiers to Beijing to take back the square from protesters. The Western account has it that then, on June 3 into June 4, PLA soldiers opened fire and killed “up to 1000 student protesters.”
WikiLeaks, the website that received hundreds of thousands of pages of intercepted diplomatic correspondence from the US State Department, has released a classified diplomatic cable from then-Beijing Ambassador James Lilley to Washington dated July 12, 1989 more than four weeks after the events. In his report, Lilley writes the following shocking version of events...
No comments:
Post a Comment