If I go, if I go closer to you
I wonder what you may think, I can’t drum up the courage

If you go, if you go away from me
It is scary to figure out how to let you go

Perhaps, the reason I only look at you, like a fool,
is for fear that you may turn your face away, and
you and I may drift further apart

Perhaps, the reason I can’t say ‘I love you’, like a fool,
is that I am afraid of the painful sad days of waiting after we meet.

If you come, if you come closer to me
I really don’t know what to do

Perhaps, the reason I only look at you, like a fool,
is for fear that you may turn your face away, and
you and I may drift further apart

Perhaps, the reason I can’t say ‘I love you’, like a fool,
is that I am afraid of the painful sad days of waiting after we meet.

Perhaps, the reason I can’t say ‘I love you’, like a fool,
is that I am afraid of the painful sad days of waiting after we meet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUyHvCSMojY

genghis khan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwhoOw2jOcs&t=35m30s

size wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_comparisons#Comparison_of_encyclopedias

Stuyvesant

Stuyvesant has contributed to the education of several Nobel laureates, winners of the Fields Medal and the Wolf Prize, and a host of other accomplished alumni. In recent years, it has had the second highest number of National Merit Scholarship semi-finalists, behind Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, in Alexandria, Virginia,.[80] Over the past nine years (2002–2010), Stuyvesant has produced 103 semi-finalists and 13 finalists on the Intel Science Talent Search, the second most of any secondary school in the United States (after Maryland's Montgomery Blair High School).[81]

For most of the 20th century, the student body at Stuyvesant was heavily Jewish. A significant influx of Asian students began in the 1970s. For the 2010 academic year, the student body was approximately 72.05% Asian and 23.55% Caucasian, 1.21% African American and 2.43% Hispanic.[4] Stuyvesant possesses a racial breakdown that is far out of proportion to national and local population distributions.[15][24] (See also Demographics of New York City.)

china ip transfer

http://ipr.chinadaily.com.cn/2011-03/01/content_12096574.htm

best site ever

http://www.ncix.com/products/productdetail2.php?noheader=1&sku=7842

JAMES PETRAS CHINA

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30745.htm

LOLI POLIIIIIIII

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25V5qZ3pbIw&feature=related
http://east_west_dialogue.tripod.com/id12.html
Unlike China, Britain’s industrial revolution and overseas expansion was driven by a military policy. According to Hobson, during the period from 1688-1815 Great Britain was engaged in wars 52% of the time.3 Whereas the Chinese relied on their open markets, their superior production, and sophisticated commercial and banking skills, the British relied on tariff protection, military conquest, the systematic destruction of competitive overseas enterprises as well as the appropriation and plunder of local resources. China’s global predominance was based on “reciprocal benefits” with its trading partners, while Britain relied on mercenary armies of occupation, savage repression and a “divide and conquer” policy to foment local rivalries. In the face of native resistance, the British (as well as other Western imperial powers) did not hesitate to exterminate entire communities.4

lower caste indians

htp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHjiLzZKASQ&t=2m44s