Japan is a major player in the high performance computing space, but
it is often overlooked in favor of discussions about the latest efforts
out of China and the US. While China’s national showpiece of Tianhe-2
gets its share of attention, it’s important to remember that on the
Linpack Top500 list of HPC systems, within the top 20 Japan holds two
positions: the fourth and 15th.
Given Japan’s industrial and scientific might as the world’s third-largest economy, it’s expected that it would also be a major
HPC
power. Japanese firms are fast at work designing exascale systems, and
the Riken Advanced Institute for Computational Science, home to the
world’s fourth fastest supercomputer (which held the title as fastest
when it was switched on in 2011), might be home to the world’s first exascale system even before the United States.
On the sidelines of the Supercomputing Frontiers 2015 conference in Singapore, the VR World
team sat down with Dr. Satoshi Matsuoka of the Tokyo Institute of
Technology, one of the leading figures in HPC in Japan to discuss the
state of HPC in the country.
VR World: What is the state of Japanese supercomputing when compared to the competitive landscapes of the United States and China?
Satoshi Matsuoka: Historically,
the Japanese HPC market and Japanese technology has always been fairly
competitive especially in the system architecture space. US and Japan
are now the two countries that are producing supercomputing platforms
that are sold worldwide. What China creates is not sold to the outside
market.
The Japanese market in computing has always come from the
mainframe market. Hitachi, Fujitsu and NEC… they were all mainframe
vendors. There were actually others but they have since moved away so
there. These have always been the biggest mainframe vendors.
Fujitsu
has gone the way of building their own MP piece since actually they
built the first MP piece in the 90s, the AP 1000. And then they went to
building its own SPARC processors so differs from Oracle, SUN and then
now with the K computer [the world’s fourth fastest supercomputer].
VRW: So
you would say the Fujitsu SPARC in terms of computational performance,
stability for HPC, or client computing is actually ahead of Oracle’s at
this point?
SM: Way ahead, yes; it is very HPC focused.
So it is hard to say which one is better but for HPC, definitely
Fujitsu’s [system] is better. Now looking at the hardware side, there
are some advantages [over Oracle], because the Japanese vendors are
focusing on building fairly special-purpose HPC hardware. They can
really tailor the processors to be directed towards this specific
market.
For example, the FX 100; the latest chip from Fujitsu has 34 cores.
VRW: Are you comfortable Fujitsu will continue in the medium to long-term. Are they committed to leading the industry in your mind?
SM: Yes.
They are. They have embedded the Tofu network into the latest FX 100.
They were the first adopters of using HMC, the 3D stacking technology.
And also they have enormously high injection bandwidth within the
network, they also have RAS features [reliability, availability, and
serviceability] that are extensive which makes them, in comparison to
other processors, really competitive.
So it is becoming
increasingly difficult for the Japanese HPC vendors to try to compete
with the American counterparts because now designing these processors
has become increasingly expensive. There are more transistors, now with
lithography design becoming more complicated and you need more
validation testing. So much of the Japanese HPC development is being
funded by public money because still there are some centers that buy
[the HPC systems] and also there are national projects like the K
computer now post K computer project has been approved.
So this
makes it very hard for the Japanese vendors. Now of course the Japanese
vendors also have their own XV-6 line and so forth – Fujitsu sells XV-6
machines; so does NEC, so does Hitachi. And Hitachi has alliance with
IBM now so they don’t make their own processors anymore. They work with
IBM to design high-end systems.
I think the only way the Japanese
vendors can survive is to – but it is my personal view – they will
become more aligned with the overall, commoditization leveraging of the
other markets. It is not to say they will produce something cheap. Again
I will say that commoditization is about building cheap stuff.
Commoditization is actually to apply the latest and greatest
technologies however to be compliant with certain standards.
VRW: Thanks for your time.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
prodigy asian music
It’s said that you’re only young once—and sometimes not even that.
“Canada’s
piano superstar is 8 years old,” proclaimed the Canadian Broadcasting
Corp. earlier this year. The superstar in question, Kevin Chen, passed
the country’s piano teacher exam and is studying at the Royal
Conservatory of Music. Five-year-old Ryan Wang, a fellow Canadian
pianist, has performed at Carnegie Hall. Ten-year-old pianist Laetitia
Hahn has been delighting German concertgoers with her Chopin and
Beethoven for over three years. British 9-year-old Alma Deutscher
started playing the piano at the age of 2 and the violin at 3 and now
composes operas, having acquired an early taste for the trade by writing
Nokia ringtones. Conservatories in Europe and North America report an
increasing number of preteens who turn up for auditions flawlessly
performing repertoire previously considered the domain of 25-year-olds.
Welcome
to the awe-inspiring age of underage marvels who rattle off Chopin’s
tricky études as well as entire piano concertos. “Musicians are doing
more advanced things at a younger age than ever before,” says Yoheved
Kaplinsky, a professor of piano at the Juilliard School in New York City
and head of its pre-college division. “It’s the Olympics syndrome:
Records exist in order to be broken. Today kids are recording the Chopin
études at the age of 10. When I was young, nobody played them until
they were adults.”
The trend is most obvious for the piano,
though string players are also showing impressive skills at an
ever-younger age. In a nod to the youthful trend, the prominent Van
Cliburn piano competition recently announced that it will add contests
for 13- to 17-year-olds. The American Protégé competition already
features a category for players from ages 6 to 10, and next year New
York’s Kaufman Music Center will hold its second International Youth
Piano Competition, open to players ages 7 to 17.
“Today
most young musicians winning competitions are Asian,” notes Murray
McLachlan, a teacher at Manchester, England’s famous Chetham’s School of
Music. “They dominate music making at both the school and the
conservatory level.” With China reportedly having 30 million young
pianists, the fact that a number of them are winning competitions may
not be surprising. But, says McLachlan, an acclaimed performer, Chinese
children succeed at the keyboard because their families value the work
ethic that piano playing demands. An increasing number of Chinese
prodigies attend European and American music schools and conservatories.
Move Over, Beethoven
There
have, of course, always been prodigies. Six-year-old Wolfgang Amadeus
Mozart dazzled 18th century dukes and monarchs with his skills on the
keyboard and the violin, and already had several compositions under his
belt. Daniel Barenboim, the Argentinean-born pianist, performed in
Vienna when he was 8, and Anne-Sophie Mutter, the German violinist, made
her international debut at 13. But they were true prodigies, young
musicians who combined technical brilliance with promising artistry.
Today, by contrast, there are so many young star performers that age
alone seems to mark their value. Would Kevin be performing on the CBC,
and Alma on The Ellen DeGeneres Show, if they were 15 or even
10 years old? “The danger is that we’re creating machines that can play
any piece at any speed,” says Gabriela Montero, the celebrated
Venezuelan pianist, who was herself a child prodigy.
“It’s a worrisome trend because it highlights early
achievement rather than substance and artistry,” says Kaplinsky. “I see
16-year-olds who are lamenting the fact that they haven’t performed at
Carnegie Hall yet.” But the age race is hardly surprising: It’s much
easier to measure years than artistry, and it makes for better
headlines. On a recent visit to China, one leading impresario listened
to several young virtuosos seeking European concert representation,
among them a 9-year-old. Against such competition, a 10- or 11-year-old
almost seems like a loser.
In the 1996 film Shine,
Geoffrey Rush plays David Helfgott, the British pianist who as a teen
buckles under immense pressure to succeed and suffers a mental
breakdown. That’s an extreme reaction, but prodigies don’t always go on
to great success as adult artists. In fact, childhood success has little
impact on a musician’s career. “Early accomplishment means nothing in
the long run,” says Kaplinsky. “Child musicians delight audiences
because it’s fun seeing somebody so young doing so much, but some of
them burn out.” That may provide some consolation—or schadenfreude—to those 16-year-olds who’ve yet to play Carnegie Hall.
For
those who lack artistic goals and have simply mastered the technique to
wow parents, teachers and audiences, the fall from child star to
teenager will cause anguish, along with anger at mums and dads who took
their tiger parenting too seriously.
The proof of the
real talent of prodigies is whether they’ll blow audiences away with
their performances in 20 years’ time. Mozart went on to have a pretty
respectable career, and Barenboim—now also a conductor—remains a titan
of the music world, as does Mutter.
“The transition
from child prodigy to adult artist is a very difficult one,” says
Montero, who made her concert debut at 8 but gave up playing the piano
10 years later. “As an artist, you have to have something to say, but
you don’t have anything to say if you’ve spent your life in a practice
room.” Armed with life experience and an artistic voice, Montero
returned to the keyboard at 20.
Kaplinsky says that
conservatories should support early achievers only if they exhibit
artistic potential as well. “We’ve had kids come in to audition and play
note-perfect, but we felt there was a musical vacuum behind their
performance and didn’t offer them admission,” she says. Juilliard
occasionally offers a place to a young musician who’s not technically
brilliant but shows artistic potential.
Nevertheless,
with 9-year-old virtuosos now run-of-the-mill, it may take more than
practice, practice, practice for future prodigies to get on The Ellen DeGeneres Show.
Most musicians would agree with Montero, who calls musical performances
without personal interpretation simply a “numbers game of faster and
younger.”
“Obviously, musicians have to work hard, and
the younger the better,” says McLachlan, “but the main thing is to be in
love with music.”
There is, in other words, still hope for those 14-year-old stragglers.
implying asians only know how to play the piano music
>>yeah, if we're just stupid robots who only know how to play the piano, then how do you explain most young composers winning in major events are asian?
http://www.goldenkeyfestival.com/composition_winners_2013.html
http://www.goldenkeyfestival.com/composition_winners_2013.html
asians iq 4chan
No, no one claims that we can measure it. We can estimate it, because
it's not a concrete thing. Their argument is that races are not
discrete. A person of X race may have Y amount of genes that come from
another group. For that reason, saying everyone is either X or Y is a
very broad categorization that reduces reality to something much simpler
than it is. This is the crux of their argument.
Now, obviously, unless it can be shown that IQ is less of a predictor to success amongst Asians, the notion that Asians, despite having a higher IQ, are somehow inferior to Whites is absolutely ridiculous and inept.
Now, obviously, unless it can be shown that IQ is less of a predictor to success amongst Asians, the notion that Asians, despite having a higher IQ, are somehow inferior to Whites is absolutely ridiculous and inept.
iq predictor measure intelligence
>>1497023
>but not for measuring what "intelligence" is
It actually is. IQ tests has a very high g loading ( like .8). The g factor is the factor that is inherent in any test of mental ability and is a very reliable substitute for what people consider "intelligence".
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)
Moreover, IQ tests are a better predictor of job performance and life outcomes than any other single factor. Parent wealth, education level, attractiveness, etc are all worse predictors than IQ.
http://www.unc.edu/~nielsen/soci708/cdocs/Schmidt_Hunter_2004.pdf read the abstract
>but not for measuring what "intelligence" is
It actually is. IQ tests has a very high g loading ( like .8). The g factor is the factor that is inherent in any test of mental ability and is a very reliable substitute for what people consider "intelligence".
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)
Moreover, IQ tests are a better predictor of job performance and life outcomes than any other single factor. Parent wealth, education level, attractiveness, etc are all worse predictors than IQ.
http://www.unc.edu/~nielsen/soci708/cdocs/Schmidt_Hunter_2004.pdf read the abstract
foreign born scientists in the U.S.
Indicative of the future, the foreign-born made up over half of doctorate scientists and engineers under the age of 45 in 2000 and 57 percent of post-doctorate workers. Nearly 60 percent of the growth in the number of PhD scientists and engineers in the country in the 1990s came from the foreign-born.
foreign-born scientists
Scientists and engineers making exceptional contributions to the physical sciences. Regardless of benchmark date or indicator, we find the foreign-born to be disproportionately represented among those making exceptional contributions in the physical sciences (Table 6). For example, more than half (55.6%) of the outstanding authors in the physical sciences are foreign-born compared to just 20.4% of physical scientists in the scientific labor force as of 1980 (Table 1). We also find that the foreign-educated are disproportionately represented for a number of the indicators = among the most-cited and outstanding authors, as well as first authors of hot papers.
Indicative of the future, the foreign-born made up over half of doctorate scientists and engineers under the age of 45 in 2000 and 57 percent of post-doctorate workers. Nearly 60 percent of the growth in the number of PhD scientists and engineers in the country in the 1990s came from the foreign-born
Indicative of the future, the foreign-born made up over half of doctorate scientists and engineers under the age of 45 in 2000 and 57 percent of post-doctorate workers. Nearly 60 percent of the growth in the number of PhD scientists and engineers in the country in the 1990s came from the foreign-born
commies betrayed chiang
On 22 October 1936, Chiang flew to Xi'an from Nanjing and announced his new plan of suppression of the communist forces, raising opposition from both Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng. On 4 December 1936, Chiang came to Xi'an again, accompanied by many senior Kuomintang leaders including Chen Cheng to monitor the suppression campaign. In the interim between these two visits the Japanese backed Inner Mongolian Army had tried to invade Suiyuan. This invasion was defeated by the Chinese in the Suiyuan Campaign (1936), the success giving many Chinese the belief that it was possible and necessary to resist the Japanese.[1]
After unsuccessfully attempting to persuade Chiang to voluntarily join forces with the CPC to meet the impending threat of Japan, Zhang and Yang finally decided to take matters into their own hands. In the early hours of 12 December 1936, Chiang and his entourage were arrested by Zhang's bodyguards. During the arrest, Shao Yuanchong (Chinese: 邵元冲), the incumbent minister of the propaganda department of the Kuomintang, died after he was hit in his testicles while attempting to climb over a fence. Colonel Jiang Xiaoxian (Chinese: 蒋孝先), Chiang's nephew and bodyguard, was also killed during the chaos for past grievances.
Misperceived as a coup by Zhang, news of the incident shocked the world. But Zhang and Yang had a different plan. While the country was reeling in confusion, they contacted the CPC and requested a delegation be sent to Xian to discuss Chiang’s fate and that of the whole of China.
There was great disagreement within both the CPC and Kuomintang on how to handle the incident. Senior leaders of the Kuomintang decided to set up an acting commission for resolution. Chiang’s wife Soong May-ling (Madame Chiang Kai-shek, 宋美齡) was excluded from this commission although she desperately asked for a peace negotiation. General Tung Cheuk Heem was appointed to take charge of the military. His role was quite controversial. He was voted as acting commander to lead the Kuomintang armies for the rescue of Chiang. Historians used to say that He Yingqin strongly supported solving this incident by force, for which He contacted Wang Jingwei asking him back to China to take charge of Kuomintang. Two armies were marched to Xian to fight Zhang’s army. It has been said that when Madam Chiang came to him to ask for a peaceful solution, He refused her on the grounds of her being a woman with little knowledge of politics who should stay out of state issues.[this quote needs a citation] New evidence suggests that it was actually the Whampoa clique, especially the young and extremist officers from the Blue Shirts Society, who intended to launch military attacks against Zhang, even though He Yingqin rejected their request for military support. The radical young officers of the Blue Shirts Society and Whampoa clique could not wait for the decisions to be made by their senior leaders and launched expeditions against Zhang's forces. Although he did not support the young officers in public, his connivance did promote conditions calling for Chiang's death. However, warlords such as Li Zongren and Yan Xishan who used to oppose Chiang, did not want Chiang to die. They knew that if they advocated the execution of Chiang, Japan would benefit the most from a China without a national leader. These warlord generals sent their telegrams of reprimand to Zhang Xueliang and Yang and voiced their support for Chiang. Furthermore, most of the western powers, such as the United States and United Kingdom, preferred a peaceful resolution to the incident, for they regarded Chiang as the ideal person to govern China.
In the CPC, there were two opinions as well. Most of the leaders such as Mao and Zhu De proposed the execution of Chiang for his suppressions, which had damaged the CPC immensely. Some of them, such as Zhou Enlai and Zhang Wentian, did realize it could bring more damage to the anti-Japan movement if Chiang was executed. At last they only made a resolution to send a delegation consisting of senior leaders such as Zhou, Ye Jianying and Qin Bangxian to Xi'an at the request of Zhang and Yang.
As the fury over Chiang and pressure for his execution intensified among the CPC members and armies of Zhang and Yang, the situation worsened for Chiang. Madam Chiang did not believe that the Kuomintang would be effective in freeing her husband. Thus, on 14 December 1936, Madam Chiang sent her Australian adviser, William Henry Donald, who had previously been Zhang’s adviser (and had helped him overcome opium addiction), to Xi'an for negotiation. The winds began to change his way after Stalin gave his guidance on this incident. Stalin believed that Chiang's execution would not be beneficial to either Chinese resistance to Japan or Soviet interests in the Far East. Desperately in need of Soviet aid, Mao relented to Stalin’s opinion and showed his enthusiasm for peace talks. On 17 December 1936, the CPC delegation was sent to Xi'an and met with Zhang and Yang to find a peaceful resolution. On 22 December 1936, Madam Chiang and her elder brother T. V. Soong flew to Xian to meet the CPC delegation, Zhang, and Yang. On 24 December 1936, the parties reached an agreement to establish a united front against Japan and to release prisoners accused of inciting anti-Japanese riots. The next day, Chiang and his entourage were released. Zhang escorted him back to Nanjing, although Zhou expressed his concern.
==========
After unsuccessfully attempting to persuade Chiang to voluntarily join forces with the CPC to meet the impending threat of Japan, Zhang and Yang finally decided to take matters into their own hands. In the early hours of 12 December 1936, Chiang and his entourage were arrested by Zhang's bodyguards. During the arrest, Shao Yuanchong (Chinese: 邵元冲), the incumbent minister of the propaganda department of the Kuomintang, died after he was hit in his testicles while attempting to climb over a fence. Colonel Jiang Xiaoxian (Chinese: 蒋孝先), Chiang's nephew and bodyguard, was also killed during the chaos for past grievances.
Misperceived as a coup by Zhang, news of the incident shocked the world. But Zhang and Yang had a different plan. While the country was reeling in confusion, they contacted the CPC and requested a delegation be sent to Xian to discuss Chiang’s fate and that of the whole of China.
There was great disagreement within both the CPC and Kuomintang on how to handle the incident. Senior leaders of the Kuomintang decided to set up an acting commission for resolution. Chiang’s wife Soong May-ling (Madame Chiang Kai-shek, 宋美齡) was excluded from this commission although she desperately asked for a peace negotiation. General Tung Cheuk Heem was appointed to take charge of the military. His role was quite controversial. He was voted as acting commander to lead the Kuomintang armies for the rescue of Chiang. Historians used to say that He Yingqin strongly supported solving this incident by force, for which He contacted Wang Jingwei asking him back to China to take charge of Kuomintang. Two armies were marched to Xian to fight Zhang’s army. It has been said that when Madam Chiang came to him to ask for a peaceful solution, He refused her on the grounds of her being a woman with little knowledge of politics who should stay out of state issues.[this quote needs a citation] New evidence suggests that it was actually the Whampoa clique, especially the young and extremist officers from the Blue Shirts Society, who intended to launch military attacks against Zhang, even though He Yingqin rejected their request for military support. The radical young officers of the Blue Shirts Society and Whampoa clique could not wait for the decisions to be made by their senior leaders and launched expeditions against Zhang's forces. Although he did not support the young officers in public, his connivance did promote conditions calling for Chiang's death. However, warlords such as Li Zongren and Yan Xishan who used to oppose Chiang, did not want Chiang to die. They knew that if they advocated the execution of Chiang, Japan would benefit the most from a China without a national leader. These warlord generals sent their telegrams of reprimand to Zhang Xueliang and Yang and voiced their support for Chiang. Furthermore, most of the western powers, such as the United States and United Kingdom, preferred a peaceful resolution to the incident, for they regarded Chiang as the ideal person to govern China.
In the CPC, there were two opinions as well. Most of the leaders such as Mao and Zhu De proposed the execution of Chiang for his suppressions, which had damaged the CPC immensely. Some of them, such as Zhou Enlai and Zhang Wentian, did realize it could bring more damage to the anti-Japan movement if Chiang was executed. At last they only made a resolution to send a delegation consisting of senior leaders such as Zhou, Ye Jianying and Qin Bangxian to Xi'an at the request of Zhang and Yang.
As the fury over Chiang and pressure for his execution intensified among the CPC members and armies of Zhang and Yang, the situation worsened for Chiang. Madam Chiang did not believe that the Kuomintang would be effective in freeing her husband. Thus, on 14 December 1936, Madam Chiang sent her Australian adviser, William Henry Donald, who had previously been Zhang’s adviser (and had helped him overcome opium addiction), to Xi'an for negotiation. The winds began to change his way after Stalin gave his guidance on this incident. Stalin believed that Chiang's execution would not be beneficial to either Chinese resistance to Japan or Soviet interests in the Far East. Desperately in need of Soviet aid, Mao relented to Stalin’s opinion and showed his enthusiasm for peace talks. On 17 December 1936, the CPC delegation was sent to Xi'an and met with Zhang and Yang to find a peaceful resolution. On 22 December 1936, Madam Chiang and her elder brother T. V. Soong flew to Xian to meet the CPC delegation, Zhang, and Yang. On 24 December 1936, the parties reached an agreement to establish a united front against Japan and to release prisoners accused of inciting anti-Japanese riots. The next day, Chiang and his entourage were released. Zhang escorted him back to Nanjing, although Zhou expressed his concern.
==========
asians better students cleaners vs professionals
The children of cleaners in Asian cities such as Shanghai and Singapore
are better at maths than the offspring of doctors and lawyers in the US
and UK, according to an analysis of the global Pisa test rankings
published on Tuesday
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b1ec9ac2-987c-11e3-a32f-00144feab7de.html#axzz3UTo0wrbF
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b1ec9ac2-987c-11e3-a32f-00144feab7de.html#axzz3UTo0wrbF
china science ranking
An analysis of ISI Web of Knowledge
data found that China had increased its share of the 1% of most highly
cited science articles from 1.85% in 2001 to 11.3% in 2011. By 2014
China could surpass Germany and the UK and be ranked second after the
United States. The share of the United States declined from 64.3% to
50.7% during the same ten-year period.[31]
asian crime rate poor poverty race
Nor does it follow that the poorer an ethnic group, the higher its crime
rate. During the 1960's, San Francisco's Chinatown had the lowest
income, the highest unemployment rate, the least education, the highest
rates of tuberculosis and the most substandard housing of any area of
the city. Yet in 1965, there were only five Chinese in prison in the
entire state of California. Black scholar Ira Reid notes that during
the 1930's, black West Indian immigrants lived in the same inner-city
poverty as American blacks, yet were underrepresented among prison
inmates while American blacks were three to seven times overrepresented.
christian head discrimination UCLA case
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eMwYtycb_I
Dr. Head said he had confronted his boss after the incident, who brushed it off, and according to Dr. Head, the harassment and insults continued, with one of his bosses referring to him as “an affirmative action hire.” After six years, he felt he had no recourse except to file his lawsuit in April 2012, rather than stay within the university redress process, which he calls “untrustworthy.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2370094/Black-surgeon-Dr-Christian-Head-wins-4-5-million-racial-discrimination-lawsuit-UCLA-medical-school-superimposed-head-gorilla.html
https://www.uclahealth.org/provider/marilene-beth-wang-md
https://www.uclahealth.org/Pages/Search/SearchResults.aspx?k=Dr%20Gerald%20Berke
https://people.healthsciences.ucla.edu/institution/personnel?personnel_id=9355
http://revcom.us/a/272/persecution-of-dr-christian-head-at-ucla-en.html
Dr. Head said he had confronted his boss after the incident, who brushed it off, and according to Dr. Head, the harassment and insults continued, with one of his bosses referring to him as “an affirmative action hire.” After six years, he felt he had no recourse except to file his lawsuit in April 2012, rather than stay within the university redress process, which he calls “untrustworthy.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2370094/Black-surgeon-Dr-Christian-Head-wins-4-5-million-racial-discrimination-lawsuit-UCLA-medical-school-superimposed-head-gorilla.html
https://www.uclahealth.org/provider/marilene-beth-wang-md
https://www.uclahealth.org/Pages/Search/SearchResults.aspx?k=Dr%20Gerald%20Berke
https://people.healthsciences.ucla.edu/institution/personnel?personnel_id=9355
http://revcom.us/a/272/persecution-of-dr-christian-head-at-ucla-en.html
ashkenazim intelligence
Bad Science
The leading American geneticist Harry Ostrer simply dismissed the paper: “It’s bad science,” he said, “not because it’s provocative, but because it’s bad genetics and bad epidemiology.” But it took two years before an academic paper was written refuting its core premises, and none of the media picked up on this riposte, allowing the Ashkenazi claim to settle.
One of its key points was that Ashkenazim evolved to become more intelligent because they were genetically isolated, but a recent gene search by 19 scientists found that European women (rather than Middle Eastern) were responsible for 81 percent of the mitrochondrial DNA of Ashkenazi Jews suggesting that inter-marriage between Jewish men and non-Jewish women was commonplace. The paper’s other historical and biological premises have since been lambasted by academic critics, and yet it continues to be widely cited.
http://thenewsnigeria.com.ng/2015/03/12/analysis-do-whites-have-better-iqs-than-blacks/
The leading American geneticist Harry Ostrer simply dismissed the paper: “It’s bad science,” he said, “not because it’s provocative, but because it’s bad genetics and bad epidemiology.” But it took two years before an academic paper was written refuting its core premises, and none of the media picked up on this riposte, allowing the Ashkenazi claim to settle.
One of its key points was that Ashkenazim evolved to become more intelligent because they were genetically isolated, but a recent gene search by 19 scientists found that European women (rather than Middle Eastern) were responsible for 81 percent of the mitrochondrial DNA of Ashkenazi Jews suggesting that inter-marriage between Jewish men and non-Jewish women was commonplace. The paper’s other historical and biological premises have since been lambasted by academic critics, and yet it continues to be widely cited.
http://thenewsnigeria.com.ng/2015/03/12/analysis-do-whites-have-better-iqs-than-blacks/
How the hell is this possible that Whites still turned out on top?
>>1464743
>>1455668
>How the hell is this possible that Whites still turned out on top? Not the Jews, mind you, just the average Whites like Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese and of course, Anglo-Saxons. How come they, and not East Asians, colonized the world and at their peak controlled 85% of the world's land area? How come it was non-Jewish Whites who put a man on the moon, invented the car, the airplane, the electric battery and a whole lot of other stuff? If we assume the standard deviations to be equal or to be higher for East Asians, none of this will make sense anymore.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t3QSGRN1-U&t=88m30s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23xq5vEOyf4&t=664s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=14m01s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=36m50s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-eehcES3U&t=5m19s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pw1MEyT-qU&t=5m03s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMYz2AHwEzo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHyspkeyIfs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7deJXU4ZRG0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DJkE3zh6RE&t=23m02s
https://vimeo.com/49327543
https://vimeo.com/48926594
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQH6kdid2gU
GREED
>>1455668
>How the hell is this possible that Whites still turned out on top? Not the Jews, mind you, just the average Whites like Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese and of course, Anglo-Saxons. How come they, and not East Asians, colonized the world and at their peak controlled 85% of the world's land area? How come it was non-Jewish Whites who put a man on the moon, invented the car, the airplane, the electric battery and a whole lot of other stuff? If we assume the standard deviations to be equal or to be higher for East Asians, none of this will make sense anymore.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t3QSGRN1-U&t=88m30s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23xq5vEOyf4&t=664s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=14m01s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=36m50s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-eehcES3U&t=5m19s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pw1MEyT-qU&t=5m03s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMYz2AHwEzo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHyspkeyIfs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7deJXU4ZRG0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DJkE3zh6RE&t=23m02s
https://vimeo.com/49327543
https://vimeo.com/48926594
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQH6kdid2gU
GREED
real reason for multiculturalism
You realize that the Jews aren't responsible for the multiculturalism in the West, right? It's because the Japanese fought against White supremacy and White imperialism, and because of that they couldn't just keep milking resources out of Africa like they did before. Because the Africans like the others they decided to fight them off and fight off racism. If the Whites were to close their borders, the colored world would just boycott the West.
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ccbh/souls/vol3no3/vol3num3art2.pdf
PISA brainpower geniuses ranking elite levels
Below are the countries with the most brain power, noting the average
percentage getting the top score on PISA tests, and the the estimated
number of brilliant people.
#1 The United StatesOn average, 1.7% scored at elite levels 5,336,300 brilliant people estimated
#2 JapanOn average, 4.05% scored at elite levels5,167,800 brilliant people estimated
#3 South KoreaOn average, 4.40% scored at elite levels2,200,000 brilliant people estimated
#4 GermanyOn average, 2.60% scored at elite levels2,129,140 brilliant people estimated
#5 FranceOn average, 2.20% scored at elite levels1,445,400 brilliant people estimated
#6 TaiwanOn average, 5.85% scored at elite levels1,365,390 brilliant people estimated
#7 CanadaOn average, 3.10% scored at elite levels1,081,280 brilliant people estimated
#8 RussiaOn average, 0.65% scored at elite levels932,750 brilliant people estimated
#9 The United KingdomOn average, 1.4% scored at elite levels885,220 brilliant people estimated
#10 AustraliaOn average, 3.3% scored at elite levels748,440 brilliant people estimated
#11 ItalyOn average, 1% scored at elite levels609,200 brilliant people estimated
#12 PolandOn average, 1.45% scored at elite levels558,830 brilliant people estimated
#13 SingaporeOn average, 9.10% scored at elite levels483,392 brilliant people estimated
#14 TurkeyOn average, 0.65% scored at elite levels481,000 brilliant people estimated
#15 Hong KongOn average, 6.00% scored at elite levels429,300 brilliant people estimated
#16 The NetherlandsOn average, 2.55% scored at elite levels427,635 brilliant people estimated
#17 BelgiumOn average, 3.45% scored at elite levels384,330 brilliant people estimated
#18 SpainOn average, 0.75% scored at elite levels354,525 brilliant people estimated
#19 SwitzerlandOn average, 4.25% scored at elite levels339,873 brilliant people estimated
#20 BrazilOn average, 0.10% scored at elite levels198,700 brilliant people estimated
#21 The Czech RepublicOn average, 1.80% scored at elite levels189,180 brilliant people estimated
#22 New ZealandOn average, 4.1% scored at elite levels181,753 brilliant people estimated
#23 SwedenOn average, 1.90% scored at elite levels180,823 brilliant people estimated
#24 FinlandOn average, 3.25% scored at elite levels175,955 brilliant people estimated
#25 AustriaOn average, 1.7% scored at elite levels143,854 brilliant people estimated
#1 The United StatesOn average, 1.7% scored at elite levels 5,336,300 brilliant people estimated
#2 JapanOn average, 4.05% scored at elite levels5,167,800 brilliant people estimated
#3 South KoreaOn average, 4.40% scored at elite levels2,200,000 brilliant people estimated
#4 GermanyOn average, 2.60% scored at elite levels2,129,140 brilliant people estimated
#5 FranceOn average, 2.20% scored at elite levels1,445,400 brilliant people estimated
#6 TaiwanOn average, 5.85% scored at elite levels1,365,390 brilliant people estimated
#7 CanadaOn average, 3.10% scored at elite levels1,081,280 brilliant people estimated
#8 RussiaOn average, 0.65% scored at elite levels932,750 brilliant people estimated
#9 The United KingdomOn average, 1.4% scored at elite levels885,220 brilliant people estimated
#10 AustraliaOn average, 3.3% scored at elite levels748,440 brilliant people estimated
#11 ItalyOn average, 1% scored at elite levels609,200 brilliant people estimated
#12 PolandOn average, 1.45% scored at elite levels558,830 brilliant people estimated
#13 SingaporeOn average, 9.10% scored at elite levels483,392 brilliant people estimated
#14 TurkeyOn average, 0.65% scored at elite levels481,000 brilliant people estimated
#15 Hong KongOn average, 6.00% scored at elite levels429,300 brilliant people estimated
#16 The NetherlandsOn average, 2.55% scored at elite levels427,635 brilliant people estimated
#17 BelgiumOn average, 3.45% scored at elite levels384,330 brilliant people estimated
#18 SpainOn average, 0.75% scored at elite levels354,525 brilliant people estimated
#19 SwitzerlandOn average, 4.25% scored at elite levels339,873 brilliant people estimated
#20 BrazilOn average, 0.10% scored at elite levels198,700 brilliant people estimated
#21 The Czech RepublicOn average, 1.80% scored at elite levels189,180 brilliant people estimated
#22 New ZealandOn average, 4.1% scored at elite levels181,753 brilliant people estimated
#23 SwedenOn average, 1.90% scored at elite levels180,823 brilliant people estimated
#24 FinlandOn average, 3.25% scored at elite levels175,955 brilliant people estimated
#25 AustriaOn average, 1.7% scored at elite levels143,854 brilliant people estimated
SKILLS
- Experience with Servlets, Hibernate/JDBC or JavaScript (Google Closure, JQuery)
- Skills in integration (CSS, HTML 4-5)
- Knowledge of MYSQL
- HTML, CSS, JavaScript coding capabilities
Hands-on work experience with Python and Django
Experience using at least one Javascript framework such as jQuery/YUI/EXT2JS
Ability to build user interfaces using modern web standards
Knowledgeable on C/C++
Comfortable using a Linux development environment
Design patterns knowledge an asset
Experience using source control software (SVN, git)
Apache module programming an asset
Excellent problem solving and troubleshooting skills
Ability to clearly communicate your ideas and opinions
Understanding of networking and security concepts an asset- Knowledge of .Net required
- Knowledge of Microsoft SQL
- Knowledge of Microsoft Visual Studio a Must
- Knowledge of programming language concepts preferred
- Knowledge of database concepts
- Knowledge of architecture using VSTO best practices
- Required Minimum 5+ years of IT experience in software development/programming/Database
- Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science, Mathematics, Engineering or related field of study preferred.
- HTML, CSS, JavaScript coding capabilities
- Hands-on work experience with Python and Django
- Experience using at least one Javascript framework such as jQuery/YUI/EXT2JS
- Ability to build user interfaces using modern web standards
- Knowledgeable on C/C++
- Comfortable using a Linux development environment
- Design patterns knowledge an asset
- Experience using source control software (SVN, git)
- Apache module programming an asset
- Excellent problem solving and troubleshooting skills
- Ability to clearly communicate your ideas and opinions
- Understanding of networking and security concepts an asset
- Must be able to work well in a team development environment - See more at: http://www.bctechnology.com/jobs/Fortinet-Technologies/111064/Web-Developer---Internship-Req-INTERN.cfm?showid=111064&j=432577449977630&showdesc=0&perpage=10&page=2&startrow=11#sthash.75ntIq3P.dpuf
- HTML, CSS, JavaScript coding capabilities
- Hands-on work experience with Python and Django
- Experience using at least one Javascript framework such as jQuery/YUI/EXT2JS
- Ability to build user interfaces using modern web standards
- Knowledgeable on C/C++
- Comfortable using a Linux development environment
- Design patterns knowledge an asset
- Experience using source control software (SVN, git)
- Apache module programming an asset
- Excellent problem solving and troubleshooting skills
- Ability to clearly communicate your ideas and opinions
- Understanding of networking and security concepts an asset
- Must be able to work well in a team development environment - See more at: http://www.bctechnology.com/jobs/Fortinet-Technologies/111064/Web-Developer---Internship-Req-INTERN.cfm?showid=111064&j=432577449977630&showdesc=0&perpage=10&page=2&startrow=11#sthash.75ntIq3P.dpuf
- HTML, CSS, JavaScript coding capabilities
- Hands-on work experience with Python and Django
- Experience using at least one Javascript framework such as jQuery/YUI/EXT2JS
- Ability to build user interfaces using modern web standards
- Knowledgeable on C/C++
- Comfortable using a Linux development environment
- Design patterns knowledge an asset
- Experience using source control software (SVN, git)
- Apache module programming an asset
- Excellent problem solving and troubleshooting skills
- Ability to clearly communicate your ideas and opinions
- Understanding of networking and security concepts an asset
- Must be able to work well in a team development environment - See more at: http://www.bctechnology.com/jobs/Fortinet-Technologies/111064/Web-Developer---Internship-Req-INTERN.cfm?showid=111064&j=432577449977630&showdesc=0&perpage=10&page=2&startrow=11#sthash.75ntIq3P.dpuf
ezrael build
last whisper
trinity force
essence reaver
ionian boots of lucidity
infinity edge
phantom dancer
ghost
flash
farsight orb
trinity force
essence reaver
ionian boots of lucidity
infinity edge
phantom dancer
ghost
flash
farsight orb
koreans in japan
Better wages and more employment opportunities in the booming Japanese wartime industrial economy attracted a great number of Korean workers. Migration became massive in the 1930s, as 800,000 Koreans crossed over the Korean Strait between 1930 and 1940. By 1940, 1,24 million Koreans resided in Japan. More than three-quarters of these migrants were engaged in lower-end jobs in day labor, construction, unskilled factory work, and mining. Even these jobs, however, paid more than work in Korea.
history
Japan fueled the independence movement. Then it became clear to Russia
that it couldn't gain political support without supporting the
anticolonialism movement. Thus Maoist China and Russia took over the
movement on the foundation that Japan built starting from 1919, the day
that the racial equality proposal was pushed forward by Japan. Without
the military education and weapons given, SEA would have still have been
a colony of the West going sucky sucky on the demented White
supremacists that fucked up the world.
reasons for the Pacific war
The reason why the Korean government promotes anti-Japanese propaganda
is because they wanted to diminish their trade deficit with Japan during
their industrial development, and because they had to hate on someone
and they could not afford to have the Korean people hate on Americans,
which were the true pigs of WW2. I am Korean and I know this as a fact.
Japan was the only imperial power who was willing to develop the heavy
industries in their colonies, Japan invested more money in Korea than in
itself during the same phase of development. Japan abolished many
discriminatory laws against the Korean lower caste people. The true pigs
were the Americans who wanted to maintain their system of White
supremacy across the globe. The reason Korea didn't promote anti
American propaganda is because it needed to American capital and needed
to have the U.S. as a major trade partner in order to develop itself.
Japan did not want to annex China, it wanted to fight against Communism
because it was a threat to their plan of creating a free investment zone
for all Asian people based on the Japanese yen. The Communists in China
who were winning didn't want foreign capital or capitalism. They wanted
to build a repressive economic system based on the restriction of trade
and capital.
#1 99% of the world was colonized or annexed by White people through savage repression and warmongering.
#2 the U.S. blocked the Japanese resolution that proposed all men should be equal regardless of the color of their skin.
#3 the U.S. didn't mind that Russia invaded Mongolia and Sichuan, they were grabbing land left and right.
#4 the Europeans did not allow the Japanese to get natural resources from their colonies.
#5 China was in a civil war and did not control Manchuria.
#6 the U.S. banned Asian immigration and caused an overpopulation problem in Asia.
#7 the Great Depression caused major food shortage and hit the Japanese economy hard.
#8 the Europeans were not victim of racist laws in Japanese territory.
#9 there were a lot of racist laws inside Western countries and colonies.
#10 the West basically caused the civil war that plagued China and made profits by selling tons of arms to Chinese warlords.
#11 the U.S. trained and armed the Chinese when Japan was at war against them.
#12 Chinese nationalists carried out all sorts of terrorist attacks against Koreans and Japanese in Manchuria.
#13 the U.S. basically pressed Japan to give back Siberia to Russia after the first Russo-Japanese war with the threat of sanctions.
#14 Japan imported so much machinery from the West to develop Manchuria that it had a trade deficit with the West.
#15 the Japanese were less racist towards other Asians than Westerners.
#16 Chiang decided to ally himself with the Communist after he was betrayed by his generals and was forced to ally with them to fight off the Japanese.
#17 the Japanese realizing the Communists were taking over China decided to ask the KMT for their support against their fight against the Communists.
#18 the Europeans put extreme sanctions against Japan after it pushed for recognition of the Manchus as a people distinct from the Chinese just like the Tibetans are.
#19 the U.S. basically froze Japanese assets and banned petroleum export to Japan.
#20 the U.S. sent an ultimatum to Japan before Pearl Harbor.
#21 the West decided to use gunboats to force Asian countries to concede them commercial and political rights.
#22 tons of Japanese political leaders were killed because they were seen as being too soft, and submissive towards the West.
#23 the Europeans put extremely unfair tariffs against Japanese products.
#24 the Japanese were fighting Communism, they weren't trying to annex China, they wanted a pro-capitalist Chinese government that would be open to foreign capital investment. They wanted to ultimately create a yen block, like the EU, which would have allowed them to retaliate against Western countries' unfair trade practices.
#1 99% of the world was colonized or annexed by White people through savage repression and warmongering.
#2 the U.S. blocked the Japanese resolution that proposed all men should be equal regardless of the color of their skin.
#3 the U.S. didn't mind that Russia invaded Mongolia and Sichuan, they were grabbing land left and right.
#4 the Europeans did not allow the Japanese to get natural resources from their colonies.
#5 China was in a civil war and did not control Manchuria.
#6 the U.S. banned Asian immigration and caused an overpopulation problem in Asia.
#7 the Great Depression caused major food shortage and hit the Japanese economy hard.
#8 the Europeans were not victim of racist laws in Japanese territory.
#9 there were a lot of racist laws inside Western countries and colonies.
#10 the West basically caused the civil war that plagued China and made profits by selling tons of arms to Chinese warlords.
#11 the U.S. trained and armed the Chinese when Japan was at war against them.
#12 Chinese nationalists carried out all sorts of terrorist attacks against Koreans and Japanese in Manchuria.
#13 the U.S. basically pressed Japan to give back Siberia to Russia after the first Russo-Japanese war with the threat of sanctions.
#14 Japan imported so much machinery from the West to develop Manchuria that it had a trade deficit with the West.
#15 the Japanese were less racist towards other Asians than Westerners.
#16 Chiang decided to ally himself with the Communist after he was betrayed by his generals and was forced to ally with them to fight off the Japanese.
#17 the Japanese realizing the Communists were taking over China decided to ask the KMT for their support against their fight against the Communists.
#18 the Europeans put extreme sanctions against Japan after it pushed for recognition of the Manchus as a people distinct from the Chinese just like the Tibetans are.
#19 the U.S. basically froze Japanese assets and banned petroleum export to Japan.
#20 the U.S. sent an ultimatum to Japan before Pearl Harbor.
#21 the West decided to use gunboats to force Asian countries to concede them commercial and political rights.
#22 tons of Japanese political leaders were killed because they were seen as being too soft, and submissive towards the West.
#23 the Europeans put extremely unfair tariffs against Japanese products.
#24 the Japanese were fighting Communism, they weren't trying to annex China, they wanted a pro-capitalist Chinese government that would be open to foreign capital investment. They wanted to ultimately create a yen block, like the EU, which would have allowed them to retaliate against Western countries' unfair trade practices.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)