- NUDT Tianhe-2A (National Supercomputing Center of Guangzhou
China, June 2013 - present) - Cray Titan (Oak Ridge National Laboratory
United States, November 2012 - June 2013) - IBM Sequoia Blue Gene/Q (Los Alamos National Laboratory United States, June 2012 – November 2012)
- Fujitsu K computer (RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science
Japan, June 2011 – June 2012) - NUDT Tianhe-1A (National Supercomputing Center of Tianjin China, November 2010 – June 2011)
- Cray Jaguar (Oak Ridge National Laboratory United States, November 2009 – November 2010)
- IBM Roadrunner (Los Alamos National Laboratory United States, June 2008 – November 2009)
- IBM Blue Gene/L (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory United States, November 2004 – June 2008)
- NEC Earth Simulator (Earth Simulator Center Japan, June 2002 – November 2004)
- IBM ASCI White (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory United States, November 2000 – June 2002)
- Intel ASCI Red (Sandia National Laboratories United States, June 1997 – November 2000)
- Hitachi CP-PACS (University of Tsukuba Japan, November 1996 – June 1997)
- Hitachi SR2201 (University of Tokyo Japan, June 1996 – November 1996)
- Fujitsu Numerical Wind Tunnel (National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan Japan, November 1994 – June 1996)
- Intel Paragon XP/S140 (Sandia National Laboratories United States, June 1994 – November 1994)
- Fujitsu Numerical Wind Tunnel (National Aerospace Laboratory of Japan Japan, November 1993 – June 1994)
- TMC CM-5 (Los Alamos National Laboratory United States, June 1993 – November 1993)
best supercomputer from 1993 to 2015 number 1 innovation innovative
japan history semiconductor patent innovation innovator innovative
Intel made processors for PC. The Japanese made specialized processors for supercomputers because the profit margin was much larger; however, the PC market became larger because companies started using weaker processors in parallel instead of investing in a supercomputer (Google). That's why they lost their edge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_sales_leaders_by_year#Ranking_for_year_1987
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_sales_leaders_by_year#Ranking_for_year_1987
intelligence genes
New genetic evidence for a racial hierarchy
So I recently came across a nice paper by one Davide Piffer, titled:
Factor Analysis of Population Allele Frequencies as a Simple, Novel Method of Detecting Signals of Recent Polygenic Selection: The Example of Educational Attainment and IQ.
Why is this study interesting to us? Because it takes a few alleles influencing brain development or neurological function associated with higher intelligence and educational achievement, and compiles data on their distribution among various populations.
In short, it tells us which populations are genetically more intelligent.
These results should look familiar:
Frequency (%) of alleles associated with higher educational attainment
Beijing Chinese: 39.6% or 39.2%
[Asian: 39.1%]
Southern Chinese: 38.9%
Japanese: 38.7% or 39.6%
Finnish: 36.5%
British: 36%
Spanish 35.7%
[European: 35.5%]
Tuscany Italian: 35.1%
Utah White: 35% or 34.1%
Colombian: 32.9%
[Latin American: 31.8%]
Puerto Rican: 31.7%
California Mexican: 31.1%
Kenyan: 17.1%
US Black: 16.9%
[African: 16.4%]
Yoruba Nigerian: 15% or 14.8%
Some of the populations above get two scores because he used more studies when possible, and as you can see the results are coherent. Differences below 1 or 2% within racial groups can probably be ignored, but there's a very obvious racial gap: the frequencies of these alleles among Asian populations hovers around 39%, in Europeans around 35%, in Hispanics around 32%. Then after an enormous drop we find Blacks below 17%. The pattern is astoundingly clear.
Though the frequency data is the most reliable, he also calculated a polygenic score that attempts to weight alleles on their correlation with intelligence and scored smaller populations, which we can use to rank them. The specifics are complicated, but suffice to say that + is better than -. I have edited the data below to make it understandable:
Han (Beijing) +1.54
Daur (Kithan Mongolian) +1.49
Japanese (Tokyo) +1.41
Korean +1.34
Mongolian +1.25
Japanese +1.23
Tujia (Central Chinese) +1.12
Xibe (Manchurian) +1.08
Miao (Southern Chinese) +1.02
Tu (Mongolian) +0.96
Uyghur +0.95
Han Chinese +0.89
Dai (Thailand) +0.87
Hezhe (Siberian) +0.85
Yi (Southern Chinese) +0.84
Oroquen (Mongolian) +0.84
She (Fujian Chinese) +0.81
Lahu (Laotian Chinese) +0.72
Yakut (Turko-Mongol) +0.69
Naxi (Yunnan Tibetan) +0.48
Hazara (Persian Afghan) +0.41
Finnish +0.39
British +0.38
Adygei (Caucasian) +0.36
Druze (Israel) +0.33
Cambodian +0.32
Balochi (Pakistanese) +0.22
Italian (Tuscany) +0.19
Burusho (Central Asian) +0.16
Italian (Napolitan) +0.14
Nasioi (Melanesian) +0.12
White (Utah) +0.11
Kalash (Dardic Aryan) +0.11
Spanish +0.08
Brahui (Pakistanese Dravidian) +0.06
Palestinian +0
French -0.01
Orcadian (Orkney) -0.03
Russian -0.03
Mexican (California) -0.06
Puerto Rican -0.10
Bedouin -0.19
Pasthun -0.21
Sindhi (Pakistanese) -0.23
Mozabite (Berber) -0.24
Basque -0.30
Colombian -0.53
Sardinian -0.59
Pima (Mexican) -0.88
Amerindian (South) -0.93
Maya (Yucatan) -0.98
Surui (Amazonian) -1.15
Karitiania (Amazonian) -1.17
Papua New Guinean -1.25
Black (Southwest US) -1.44
Yoruba (Ife) -1.48
Kenyan -1.60
Mandenka (Senegal) -1.60
Yoruba (Benin) -1.65
Bantu -1.89
Biaka (Pigmy) -1.89
Mbuti (Pigmy) -2.24
San (Bushmen) -2.29
There are a few surprising finds in here. The first is that many Central Asian and Levantine populations seem at least as fit as Europeans. Perhaps it's just a quirk of small sample sizes, but remember that Levantines gave birth to Phoenicia and Carthage and the Central Asian minorities are generally Aryans (related to Persians and Northern Indians.) We might conclude that is it cultural/religious factors that are holding them back rather than genetics.
Another surprise is the relatively low score of Basques and Sardinians, which hardly does justice to their IQ. One explanation is that these populations are mostly descended from Paleo-Europeans and they are also small and endogamous, so they might have rare alleles contributing to their intelligence.
The most spectacular outliers are the Naasioi-speaking Melanesians, better known as the blonde Solomon Islanders, who score up there with the whiter nations. On the other end of the scale, Amazonian Indians and Papuans are the closest to Africans (though negroids are still at least twice as unfit.)
How come some of these populations (Mongolians, Southern Asians, various minorities) have not achieved much? Perhaps they have other genes affecting their behavior, making them unfit for civilization, or their environment made civilization difficult (Siberia is harsh, so even survival is a feat.) Many of these minorities are also high achievers within their countries, but their small population sizes prevent them from really taking over. They tend to be survivors of ancient populations wiped out by their neighbors, and this selection process may have culled the dumber members from the gene pool. In any case, it's certain that they have more potential than Africans.
Finally, it's a shame that this study doesn't have Germanic, Jewish or Aboriginal samples for comparison.
American innovation software bad troll patent law
On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider
legislation aimed at reining in abusive patent litigation. But one of
the bill's most important provisions, designed to make it easier to nix
low-quality software patents, will be left on the cutting room floor.
That provision was the victim of an aggressive lobbying campaign by
patent-rich software companies such as IBM and Microsoft.
The legislation is sponsored by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. He unveiled a new version of his bill last month, touting it as a cure for the problem of patent trolls. One provision would have expanded what's known as the "covered business method" (CBM) program, which provides an expedited process for the Patent Office to get rid of low-quality software patents. That change would aid in the fight against patent trolls because low-quality software patents are trolls' weapon of choice.
But the change could affect the bottom lines of companies with large software patent portfolios. And few firms have larger software patent portfolios than Microsoft and IBM. These companies, which also happen to have two of the software industry's largest lobbying budgets, have been leading voices against the expansion of the CBM program.
The CBM program provides a quick and cost-effective way for a defendant to challenge the validity of a plaintiff's patent. Under the program, litigation over the patent is put on hold while the Patent Office considers a patent's validity. That's important because the high cost of patent litigation is a big source of leverage for patent trolls.
The original CBM program, which was created by the 2011 America Invents Act, was limited to a relatively narrow class of financial patents. The Goodlatte bill would have codified a recent decision opening the program up to more types of patents. And advocates hoped that change would be a steppingstone to eventually subjecting all software patents to greater scrutiny.
But large software companies had other ideas. A September letter signed by IBM, Microsoft and several dozen other firms made the case against expanding the program. The proposal, they wrote, "could harm U.S. innovators by unnecessarily undermining the rights of patent holders. Subjecting data processing patents to the CBM program would create uncertainty and risk that discourage investment in any number of fields where we should be trying to spur continued innovation."
Of course, advocates of the program disagree. They point out that software patents are disproportionately responsible for the recent rise of patent litigation. The fact that technology startups almost inevitably face patent threats is itself a significant disincentive for innovation. So it's far from clear that subjecting software patents to greater scrutiny would be bad for innovation.
Last week, IBM escalated its campaign against expanding the CBM program. An IBM spokesman told Politico, "While we support what Mr. Goodlatte’s trying to do on trolls, if the CBM is included, we’d be forced to oppose the bill."
Sources close to the negotiations say the campaign against the CBM provisions of the Goodlatte bill has succeeded. The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hold a markup of the legislation Wednesday, and Goodlatte will introduce a "manager's amendment" to remove the CBM language from his own bill. IBM hailed that change in a Monday letter to Goodlatte.
The revised legislation would still take significant steps to curb abusive litigation tactics favored by trolls. But troll tactics are merely a symptom of the patent system's dysfunction. The more fundamental issue is the large number of low-quality patents, and the Goodlatte bill no longer has a provision to deal with that problem.
But the fight against bad software patents isn't over. After Goodlatte's about-face, the House of Representatives is unlikely to pass legislation expanding the CBM program. But CBM expansion has a powerful supporter in the Senate. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who was the driving force behind the original CBM program in 2011, remains determined to expand the CBM program in the Senate's patent reform legislation. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has signaled his willingness to work with Schumer on the proposal.
"Creating a low-cost alternative to litigation in order to address the poor-quality patents that are currently plaguing startups and small businesses is a cornerstone of effective reform," Schumer said in a statement Tuesday night. "I am continuing to have productive conversations with my colleagues and stakeholders in the Senate, and fully expect the critical issue of patent quality to be addressed in the Senate legislation."
Schumer will have powerful allies. The White House endorsed CBM expansion in June. A broad coalition of brick-and-mortar industries, including casinos, supermarkets, chain restaurants, airlines, the printing industry, real estate agents, hotels and retailers, endorsed the concept in a letter last month.
Still, companies with large software patent portfolios have a lot to lose if their patents are subjected to serious scrutiny. So, Schumer won't get his way without a fight.
The legislation is sponsored by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. He unveiled a new version of his bill last month, touting it as a cure for the problem of patent trolls. One provision would have expanded what's known as the "covered business method" (CBM) program, which provides an expedited process for the Patent Office to get rid of low-quality software patents. That change would aid in the fight against patent trolls because low-quality software patents are trolls' weapon of choice.
But the change could affect the bottom lines of companies with large software patent portfolios. And few firms have larger software patent portfolios than Microsoft and IBM. These companies, which also happen to have two of the software industry's largest lobbying budgets, have been leading voices against the expansion of the CBM program.
The CBM program provides a quick and cost-effective way for a defendant to challenge the validity of a plaintiff's patent. Under the program, litigation over the patent is put on hold while the Patent Office considers a patent's validity. That's important because the high cost of patent litigation is a big source of leverage for patent trolls.
The original CBM program, which was created by the 2011 America Invents Act, was limited to a relatively narrow class of financial patents. The Goodlatte bill would have codified a recent decision opening the program up to more types of patents. And advocates hoped that change would be a steppingstone to eventually subjecting all software patents to greater scrutiny.
But large software companies had other ideas. A September letter signed by IBM, Microsoft and several dozen other firms made the case against expanding the program. The proposal, they wrote, "could harm U.S. innovators by unnecessarily undermining the rights of patent holders. Subjecting data processing patents to the CBM program would create uncertainty and risk that discourage investment in any number of fields where we should be trying to spur continued innovation."
Of course, advocates of the program disagree. They point out that software patents are disproportionately responsible for the recent rise of patent litigation. The fact that technology startups almost inevitably face patent threats is itself a significant disincentive for innovation. So it's far from clear that subjecting software patents to greater scrutiny would be bad for innovation.
Last week, IBM escalated its campaign against expanding the CBM program. An IBM spokesman told Politico, "While we support what Mr. Goodlatte’s trying to do on trolls, if the CBM is included, we’d be forced to oppose the bill."
Sources close to the negotiations say the campaign against the CBM provisions of the Goodlatte bill has succeeded. The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hold a markup of the legislation Wednesday, and Goodlatte will introduce a "manager's amendment" to remove the CBM language from his own bill. IBM hailed that change in a Monday letter to Goodlatte.
The revised legislation would still take significant steps to curb abusive litigation tactics favored by trolls. But troll tactics are merely a symptom of the patent system's dysfunction. The more fundamental issue is the large number of low-quality patents, and the Goodlatte bill no longer has a provision to deal with that problem.
But the fight against bad software patents isn't over. After Goodlatte's about-face, the House of Representatives is unlikely to pass legislation expanding the CBM program. But CBM expansion has a powerful supporter in the Senate. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who was the driving force behind the original CBM program in 2011, remains determined to expand the CBM program in the Senate's patent reform legislation. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has signaled his willingness to work with Schumer on the proposal.
"Creating a low-cost alternative to litigation in order to address the poor-quality patents that are currently plaguing startups and small businesses is a cornerstone of effective reform," Schumer said in a statement Tuesday night. "I am continuing to have productive conversations with my colleagues and stakeholders in the Senate, and fully expect the critical issue of patent quality to be addressed in the Senate legislation."
Schumer will have powerful allies. The White House endorsed CBM expansion in June. A broad coalition of brick-and-mortar industries, including casinos, supermarkets, chain restaurants, airlines, the printing industry, real estate agents, hotels and retailers, endorsed the concept in a letter last month.
Still, companies with large software patent portfolios have a lot to lose if their patents are subjected to serious scrutiny. So, Schumer won't get his way without a fight.
innovation korea awards electronic creativity korean tech companies
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20131113000851
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2015/05/127_124562.html
http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ces-2015-innovation-awards-samsung-bags-36-lg-grabs-10-trophies-613802
The Consumer Electronic Show holds an annual awards event to honour the best innovations in the industry. This year Samsung and LG won several prizes in the consumer electronics category.
Samsung won 12 more awards than last year and achieved 36 in total across 29 categories. Samsung won two for best innovations and four in the Eco Design category.
Other awards include Samsung Chef Collection Slide-in induction, Samsung 850 Pro, Samsung NX1 camera, Galaxy Tab S 10.5-inch/ 8.-inch, Gear S, Gear VR, Level over, YOUM blended display, Samsung LPDDR4 Mobile DRAM to name a few.
The Slide-In induction is an oven lined with LED lights for clearer cooking. The Samsung 850 Pro is a Solid State Drive (SSD) powered by 3D vertical NANAD flash memory technology to achieve top speed. The NX1 camera comes equipped with 28MP APS-C BSI CMOS sensor and can click Ultra HD/ 4K videos. This camera also integrates WiFI connectivity and a dust and splash resistant magnesium alloy body. Both the Samsung Tab winners sport Super AMOLED screen with thinner and lighter footprints.
The Samsung Gear S is a Smartwatch with a curved display, and the Gear VR headset is compatible with Samsung Galaxy Note 4. The YOUM bended display can portray WQHD with flexible AMOLED technology.
The South Korean electronics manufacturer, LG, bagged 10 awards this year in four highly competitive categories: Home Appliances, Computer Peripherals, Video Displays and Wireless Handsets.
LG won for the breakthrough 77-inch curved flexible 4K OLED TV, the highly acclaimed LG G3 smartphone and the revolutionary LG EcoHybrid Dryer with Heat Pump technology.
Other LG products, which were recognised, including the 4K Ultra HD and OLED TVs, computer monitors and home appliances, will be announced January 7 during the 2015 International CES in Las Vegas.
This marks the third year in a row that LG's OLED TVs and premium G Series smartphones have earned CES Innovation Awards.
Sponsored by CEA and endorsed by the Industrial Designers Society of America, the CES Innovation Awards highlight product advancements in technology design and engineering. CES Innovation Awards are selected annually by a panel of prominent industry designers, engineers and journalists who judge product entries on a variety of criteria including user value, aesthetics, innovative design, quality and contributions to quality of life.
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2015/05/127_124562.html
http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ces-2015-innovation-awards-samsung-bags-36-lg-grabs-10-trophies-613802
The Consumer Electronic Show holds an annual awards event to honour the best innovations in the industry. This year Samsung and LG won several prizes in the consumer electronics category.
Samsung won 12 more awards than last year and achieved 36 in total across 29 categories. Samsung won two for best innovations and four in the Eco Design category.
Other awards include Samsung Chef Collection Slide-in induction, Samsung 850 Pro, Samsung NX1 camera, Galaxy Tab S 10.5-inch/ 8.-inch, Gear S, Gear VR, Level over, YOUM blended display, Samsung LPDDR4 Mobile DRAM to name a few.
The Slide-In induction is an oven lined with LED lights for clearer cooking. The Samsung 850 Pro is a Solid State Drive (SSD) powered by 3D vertical NANAD flash memory technology to achieve top speed. The NX1 camera comes equipped with 28MP APS-C BSI CMOS sensor and can click Ultra HD/ 4K videos. This camera also integrates WiFI connectivity and a dust and splash resistant magnesium alloy body. Both the Samsung Tab winners sport Super AMOLED screen with thinner and lighter footprints.
The Samsung Gear S is a Smartwatch with a curved display, and the Gear VR headset is compatible with Samsung Galaxy Note 4. The YOUM bended display can portray WQHD with flexible AMOLED technology.
The South Korean electronics manufacturer, LG, bagged 10 awards this year in four highly competitive categories: Home Appliances, Computer Peripherals, Video Displays and Wireless Handsets.
LG won for the breakthrough 77-inch curved flexible 4K OLED TV, the highly acclaimed LG G3 smartphone and the revolutionary LG EcoHybrid Dryer with Heat Pump technology.
Other LG products, which were recognised, including the 4K Ultra HD and OLED TVs, computer monitors and home appliances, will be announced January 7 during the 2015 International CES in Las Vegas.
This marks the third year in a row that LG's OLED TVs and premium G Series smartphones have earned CES Innovation Awards.
Sponsored by CEA and endorsed by the Industrial Designers Society of America, the CES Innovation Awards highlight product advancements in technology design and engineering. CES Innovation Awards are selected annually by a panel of prominent industry designers, engineers and journalists who judge product entries on a variety of criteria including user value, aesthetics, innovative design, quality and contributions to quality of life.
korean dishonest trust low koreans moral perjury false testimony
Koreans’ lack of faith in strangers, foreigners holds country back
A 25-year-old man surnamed Choi beat and raped his girlfriend in Cheongju, North Chungcheong Province, in July last year after she demanded they break up. When he faced police investigation, Choi’s mother, 50, hurt his son with a stone to make it look as though his girlfriend had hit him and provoked the attack. She then made him sue his girlfriend.
Both Choi and his mother surnamed Chun were recently convicted of making false accusations, with Choi also found guilty of raping and injuring his girlfriend. The court said Chun’s act was more malicious than her son’s.
Also in Cheongju, a 77-year-old man has been imprisoned four times for making 118 claims based on fabricated statements since 2000.
In April 2010, a woman in her 50s in Busan was sentenced to a year and four months in jail and a fine of 3 million won ($2,850) for a dozen false accusations including some against a prosecutor and a judge.
They were just some of a growing number of Koreans put on trial on charges of calumny. According to figures from the Supreme Court, the number increased from 1,533 in 2006 to 1,663 in 2007, 2,090 in 2008 and 2,154 in 2009.
In tandem with the rise in false accusations, the number of people tried for committing perjury in court also climbed from 1,210 in 2006 to 1,638 in 2007, 1,858 in 2008 and 1,983 in 2009.
Experts note that Korea may be the country with the highest rate of people punished for making false accusations or giving false testimonies. In 2007, Koreans indicted for perjury or calumny totaled 1,544 and 2,171, respectively, compared to only nine and 10 in Japan. Taking into account Japan’s population is about 2.5 times Korea’s, experts said the figures indicate that Koreans commit perjury and make false accusations about 420 times and 540 times the rate of the Japanese.
Law enforcement officials here also complain they are having difficulties with witnesses giving false testimonies.
“Some witnesses appear to believe they have the right to lie while making statements to investigators,” said a prosecutor at a prosecution office in Seoul.
Under the current laws, witnesses giving false testimonies to the prosecution or police go unpunished, while those proved to have fabricated facts in filing suits or to have committed perjury in court are subject to up to 10 years in prison or 15 million won in fines and up to five years in jail or 10 million won in fines, respectively. The Cabinet recently approved a revision bill to criminal laws, which would introduce obstruction of justice to enable the punishment of lying witnesses and increase the maximum prison term for perjury to seven years.
Distrust of strangers
Critics say the pervasion of false accusations, perjury and distorted testimonies reflects the embarrassing truth the country faces ― many Koreans don’t feel guilty about lying, keeping societal trust at a low level.
In his 1995 work “Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity,” U.S. scholar Francis Fukuyama placed Korea in the group of low-trust societies along with China, France and Italy, which are family-oriented and have relatively low levels of trust among strangers. He argues low-trust societies need to negotiate and often litigate rule and regulations while high-trust societies like those in Germany and Japan are able to develop innovative organizations and hold down the cost of doing business. According to him, the level of trust based upon shared norms is the most pervasive cultural characteristic influencing a nation’s prosperity and global competitiveness.
In a further reflection of the relevance of his theory, Korea has been inundated with fraud, accusations and complaints, with Koreans’ trust in strangers and foreigners remaining at lower levels, compared to other advanced countries.
According to statistics from the Justice Ministry, a total of 205,140 cases of fraud took place in 2008, costing victims about 2.8 trillion won.
Misappropriations and breaches of duty numbered 26,750 and 5,135, bringing about losses of 806 billion won and 617 billion won, respectively, in the same year.
The number of cases submitted to the prosecution increased from 564,532 in 2007 to 594,058 in 2008 and 618,470 in 2009, according to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office. More than 60 percent of them have not led to indictments by prosecutors, suggesting Koreans tend to rush to accuse someone without trying to find a compromise.
The 2005 World Values Survey showed that a mere 13.4 percent of Koreans trusted a stranger, compared to an average 33.9 percent in 12 surveyed member states of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Just three in every 10 Koreans replied they trusted foreigners, far below the OECD average of 54.3 percent. But an overwhelming 99.3 percent of Koreans expressed confidence in family members, compared to 86.9 percent in other OECD countries. About 84 percent of Koreans responded they trusted acquaintances while 76.4 percent in the OECD states said so.
The high sense of closeness to family members, friends and other acquaintances is often behind perjury cases. A survey by the prosecution found that more than half of those indicted on perjury charges had acted because of acquaintance and 26.5 percent were motivated by economic benefit.
A prosecutor, requesting anonymity, said he has often got the impression of trials being degraded into a contest of liars. Last year, a motel owner, who had been fined for arranging prostitution, was arrested for inciting his friends to give false testimonies in favor of him. His friends also stood trial on perjury charges. A man being tried for violent acts and his wife were recently punished for committing perjury. After the wife was indicted for making a false statement that her husband had not been violent, her husband had perjury added to his counts by insisting that his wife had not lied about his case.
Historical roots
Experts note the lack of a sense of justice among Koreans may be due to their tendency to put personal relations ahead of laws, which is rooted in traditional culture and has been augmented by the turbulent modern history of the nation. They say such attachment to personal ties has hampered the strict application of law and public norms in Korean society. In the Joseon Dynasty (1392-1910), which was based on Confucian principles, those who accused their parents, superiors and spouses were punished for tainting “fine customs.”
“Koreans tend to lie to maintain personal relationships, which shows the characteristics of Korean society oriented to connections and harmony,” said Mun Yong-rin, professor of education at Seoul National University, in a paper.
A report by the Korea Development Institute indicated Koreans’ tendency of trusting acquaintances and distrusting strangers has become stronger through Japan’s colonial rule, the Korean War and the rapid economic growth that has driven them to unlimited competition.
Mun said Koreans have developed their own survival wisdom based on their historical experience that personal ties and private organizations have been more helpful and protective for them than public authorities.
The low-level trust in Korean society has also been reflected in Koreans’ inclination to easily accept groundless rumors as true and doubt statements or explanations by government officials and experts. For an example, the Seoul government had difficulty getting the public to believe the outcome of the inquiry into the cause of a naval ship sinking in the West Sea in March last year. Even after inviting international experts to join the investigative team, some Koreans persistently raised suspicions over the conclusion that a North Korean torpedo attack sank the vessel.
In a survey of 2,012 adults, conducted by the Presidential Committee on Social Cohesion in 2010, a meager 3 percent of respondents said they trusted the legislature, with just 19.6 percent and 16.8 percent having confidence in the administration and the judiciary. A 2006 survey by the KDI put public trust in the legislature, administration and judiciary at 3.0, 3.3 and 4.3, respectively, on a scale of zero to 10 with 10 marking complete confidence. The scores were below or similar to 4.0 for strangers. Other organizations also marked tepid scores ― 5.4 for educational institutions and civic groups, 4.9 for the media and the military, and 4.7 for large companies.
A 2007 survey by the Pew Research Center, a nonprofit U.S. think tank, found that fewer than one in 10 Koreans were satisfied with their government, below 11 percent for Nigeria and 22 percent for Uganda and similar to 6 percent for Lebanon and 5 percent for Palestinians. Questioned on whether they believed national leaders had a good influence on state affairs, just 24 percent of Koreans replied positively ― the third from the bottom in the list of 32 surveyed countries and about half the levels in the U.S. and Japan.
With societal trust remaining low, Korea is gripped by intensifying social conflict. In a social conflict index list of 27 OECD member countries, published in a 2010 research by the Samsung Economic Research Institute, Korea ranked fourth ― behind Turkey, Poland and Slovakia.
Building trust
Critics blame the high level of distrust and conflict in Korean society for moral hazards and a lack of social responsibility among those with power and wealth. It has become a familiar scene for those designated for high-ranking posts to withdraw from their positions after coming under fire for a string of past irregularities or illegal acts revealed at parliamentary hearings. But many experts say the problem of low trust should not be attributed only to those in the higher echelons, noting that fraud, false accusations, perjury and other crimes gnawing at social trust have permeated all corners of society.
If Korea is to join the group of advanced nations, they say, the country should strengthen efforts to enhance the level of societal trust. They indicate Koreans should discard their distrust for strangers and foreigners and open wider their minds in an era when the number of expatriates living in their country has exceeded the 1 million mark and is expected to continue growing.
“Until now, economic growth has enabled Korea to come to the threshold of entering the group of advanced countries,” said Shin Kwang-yeong, sociology professor at Chung-Ang University.
“But from now on, Koreans should take steps toward building a trustful society to become a truly advanced nation.”
Na Eun-young, professor of mass communications at Sogang University, said Koreans have been passionate in their achievements and such passion has led to the permeation of the perception that in the process, other things including moral integrity can be sacrificed to some degree. She noted, however, times have changed and Koreans should recognize the increasing importance of paying heed to morality and the interests of the whole community rather than being preoccupied with their goals.
By Kim Kyung-ho (khkim@heraldcorp.com)
A 25-year-old man surnamed Choi beat and raped his girlfriend in Cheongju, North Chungcheong Province, in July last year after she demanded they break up. When he faced police investigation, Choi’s mother, 50, hurt his son with a stone to make it look as though his girlfriend had hit him and provoked the attack. She then made him sue his girlfriend.
Both Choi and his mother surnamed Chun were recently convicted of making false accusations, with Choi also found guilty of raping and injuring his girlfriend. The court said Chun’s act was more malicious than her son’s.
Also in Cheongju, a 77-year-old man has been imprisoned four times for making 118 claims based on fabricated statements since 2000.
In April 2010, a woman in her 50s in Busan was sentenced to a year and four months in jail and a fine of 3 million won ($2,850) for a dozen false accusations including some against a prosecutor and a judge.
They were just some of a growing number of Koreans put on trial on charges of calumny. According to figures from the Supreme Court, the number increased from 1,533 in 2006 to 1,663 in 2007, 2,090 in 2008 and 2,154 in 2009.
In tandem with the rise in false accusations, the number of people tried for committing perjury in court also climbed from 1,210 in 2006 to 1,638 in 2007, 1,858 in 2008 and 1,983 in 2009.
Experts note that Korea may be the country with the highest rate of people punished for making false accusations or giving false testimonies. In 2007, Koreans indicted for perjury or calumny totaled 1,544 and 2,171, respectively, compared to only nine and 10 in Japan. Taking into account Japan’s population is about 2.5 times Korea’s, experts said the figures indicate that Koreans commit perjury and make false accusations about 420 times and 540 times the rate of the Japanese.
Law enforcement officials here also complain they are having difficulties with witnesses giving false testimonies.
“Some witnesses appear to believe they have the right to lie while making statements to investigators,” said a prosecutor at a prosecution office in Seoul.
Under the current laws, witnesses giving false testimonies to the prosecution or police go unpunished, while those proved to have fabricated facts in filing suits or to have committed perjury in court are subject to up to 10 years in prison or 15 million won in fines and up to five years in jail or 10 million won in fines, respectively. The Cabinet recently approved a revision bill to criminal laws, which would introduce obstruction of justice to enable the punishment of lying witnesses and increase the maximum prison term for perjury to seven years.
Distrust of strangers
Critics say the pervasion of false accusations, perjury and distorted testimonies reflects the embarrassing truth the country faces ― many Koreans don’t feel guilty about lying, keeping societal trust at a low level.
In his 1995 work “Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity,” U.S. scholar Francis Fukuyama placed Korea in the group of low-trust societies along with China, France and Italy, which are family-oriented and have relatively low levels of trust among strangers. He argues low-trust societies need to negotiate and often litigate rule and regulations while high-trust societies like those in Germany and Japan are able to develop innovative organizations and hold down the cost of doing business. According to him, the level of trust based upon shared norms is the most pervasive cultural characteristic influencing a nation’s prosperity and global competitiveness.
In a further reflection of the relevance of his theory, Korea has been inundated with fraud, accusations and complaints, with Koreans’ trust in strangers and foreigners remaining at lower levels, compared to other advanced countries.
According to statistics from the Justice Ministry, a total of 205,140 cases of fraud took place in 2008, costing victims about 2.8 trillion won.
Misappropriations and breaches of duty numbered 26,750 and 5,135, bringing about losses of 806 billion won and 617 billion won, respectively, in the same year.
The number of cases submitted to the prosecution increased from 564,532 in 2007 to 594,058 in 2008 and 618,470 in 2009, according to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office. More than 60 percent of them have not led to indictments by prosecutors, suggesting Koreans tend to rush to accuse someone without trying to find a compromise.
The 2005 World Values Survey showed that a mere 13.4 percent of Koreans trusted a stranger, compared to an average 33.9 percent in 12 surveyed member states of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Just three in every 10 Koreans replied they trusted foreigners, far below the OECD average of 54.3 percent. But an overwhelming 99.3 percent of Koreans expressed confidence in family members, compared to 86.9 percent in other OECD countries. About 84 percent of Koreans responded they trusted acquaintances while 76.4 percent in the OECD states said so.
The high sense of closeness to family members, friends and other acquaintances is often behind perjury cases. A survey by the prosecution found that more than half of those indicted on perjury charges had acted because of acquaintance and 26.5 percent were motivated by economic benefit.
A prosecutor, requesting anonymity, said he has often got the impression of trials being degraded into a contest of liars. Last year, a motel owner, who had been fined for arranging prostitution, was arrested for inciting his friends to give false testimonies in favor of him. His friends also stood trial on perjury charges. A man being tried for violent acts and his wife were recently punished for committing perjury. After the wife was indicted for making a false statement that her husband had not been violent, her husband had perjury added to his counts by insisting that his wife had not lied about his case.
Historical roots
Experts note the lack of a sense of justice among Koreans may be due to their tendency to put personal relations ahead of laws, which is rooted in traditional culture and has been augmented by the turbulent modern history of the nation. They say such attachment to personal ties has hampered the strict application of law and public norms in Korean society. In the Joseon Dynasty (1392-1910), which was based on Confucian principles, those who accused their parents, superiors and spouses were punished for tainting “fine customs.”
“Koreans tend to lie to maintain personal relationships, which shows the characteristics of Korean society oriented to connections and harmony,” said Mun Yong-rin, professor of education at Seoul National University, in a paper.
A report by the Korea Development Institute indicated Koreans’ tendency of trusting acquaintances and distrusting strangers has become stronger through Japan’s colonial rule, the Korean War and the rapid economic growth that has driven them to unlimited competition.
Mun said Koreans have developed their own survival wisdom based on their historical experience that personal ties and private organizations have been more helpful and protective for them than public authorities.
The low-level trust in Korean society has also been reflected in Koreans’ inclination to easily accept groundless rumors as true and doubt statements or explanations by government officials and experts. For an example, the Seoul government had difficulty getting the public to believe the outcome of the inquiry into the cause of a naval ship sinking in the West Sea in March last year. Even after inviting international experts to join the investigative team, some Koreans persistently raised suspicions over the conclusion that a North Korean torpedo attack sank the vessel.
In a survey of 2,012 adults, conducted by the Presidential Committee on Social Cohesion in 2010, a meager 3 percent of respondents said they trusted the legislature, with just 19.6 percent and 16.8 percent having confidence in the administration and the judiciary. A 2006 survey by the KDI put public trust in the legislature, administration and judiciary at 3.0, 3.3 and 4.3, respectively, on a scale of zero to 10 with 10 marking complete confidence. The scores were below or similar to 4.0 for strangers. Other organizations also marked tepid scores ― 5.4 for educational institutions and civic groups, 4.9 for the media and the military, and 4.7 for large companies.
A 2007 survey by the Pew Research Center, a nonprofit U.S. think tank, found that fewer than one in 10 Koreans were satisfied with their government, below 11 percent for Nigeria and 22 percent for Uganda and similar to 6 percent for Lebanon and 5 percent for Palestinians. Questioned on whether they believed national leaders had a good influence on state affairs, just 24 percent of Koreans replied positively ― the third from the bottom in the list of 32 surveyed countries and about half the levels in the U.S. and Japan.
With societal trust remaining low, Korea is gripped by intensifying social conflict. In a social conflict index list of 27 OECD member countries, published in a 2010 research by the Samsung Economic Research Institute, Korea ranked fourth ― behind Turkey, Poland and Slovakia.
Building trust
Critics blame the high level of distrust and conflict in Korean society for moral hazards and a lack of social responsibility among those with power and wealth. It has become a familiar scene for those designated for high-ranking posts to withdraw from their positions after coming under fire for a string of past irregularities or illegal acts revealed at parliamentary hearings. But many experts say the problem of low trust should not be attributed only to those in the higher echelons, noting that fraud, false accusations, perjury and other crimes gnawing at social trust have permeated all corners of society.
If Korea is to join the group of advanced nations, they say, the country should strengthen efforts to enhance the level of societal trust. They indicate Koreans should discard their distrust for strangers and foreigners and open wider their minds in an era when the number of expatriates living in their country has exceeded the 1 million mark and is expected to continue growing.
“Until now, economic growth has enabled Korea to come to the threshold of entering the group of advanced countries,” said Shin Kwang-yeong, sociology professor at Chung-Ang University.
“But from now on, Koreans should take steps toward building a trustful society to become a truly advanced nation.”
Na Eun-young, professor of mass communications at Sogang University, said Koreans have been passionate in their achievements and such passion has led to the permeation of the perception that in the process, other things including moral integrity can be sacrificed to some degree. She noted, however, times have changed and Koreans should recognize the increasing importance of paying heed to morality and the interests of the whole community rather than being preoccupied with their goals.
By Kim Kyung-ho (khkim@heraldcorp.com)
racism against asian americans history america yellow perril
Roof’s attitude isn’t new. White supremacists have vacillated between
fear and fetishization of Asians for over a century. Beginning in the
mid-19th century, immigrant Chinese laborers and Japanese farmers
suffered violence at the hands of whites who feared they were losing
their jobs and livelihoods.
By 1920, as Congress moved to ban all Asian immigrants, Lothrop Stoddard’s book, “The Rising Tide of Color: The Threat Against White World Supremacy,” began to rise on the best-seller lists. Fear was giving way to fascination in some circles. In his book, Stoddard warned that white civilization might “be swamped by the triumphant colored races, who will obliterate the white man by elimination or absorption.” He concluded that, of all the nonwhite peoples, the Japanese and the Chinese posed the biggest threat to global white rule. He strongly supported closing off Asian immigration to the U.S. But he also argued that, because of what he called their “industriousness” and “strategic guile,” Asian deserved whites’ “mutual comprehension and respect.”
By 1920, as Congress moved to ban all Asian immigrants, Lothrop Stoddard’s book, “The Rising Tide of Color: The Threat Against White World Supremacy,” began to rise on the best-seller lists. Fear was giving way to fascination in some circles. In his book, Stoddard warned that white civilization might “be swamped by the triumphant colored races, who will obliterate the white man by elimination or absorption.” He concluded that, of all the nonwhite peoples, the Japanese and the Chinese posed the biggest threat to global white rule. He strongly supported closing off Asian immigration to the U.S. But he also argued that, because of what he called their “industriousness” and “strategic guile,” Asian deserved whites’ “mutual comprehension and respect.”
japanese
Originally Posted by Google TranslateJapanese cannibals find the best
The cannibals of Papua New Guinea Japanese prefer to eat than whites. Nothing, however, goes beyond a billetje of their own women on the menu.
That told the cannibals to the Italian photographer Iago Corazza. He pulled together with a German anthropologist, Olga Ammann, by the deep jungle of Papua New Guinea, where the last cannibals tribes live. "The white-meat smells and tastes too much too salty. Ideally, we Japanese people eat meat. That is only surpassed by the meat of our own women, "say the people-eaters.
Although cannibalism more than fifty years is prohibited on the island, anthropologists are convinced that some tribes are still holding to make human flesh. The fact that the Kuru disease still occurs regularly proves that. The disease can only be transmitted by eating meat infected people. (Váh)
anti japan sentiment opinion tiananmen square chinese propaganda history anti-japanese public opinion tension
Vogel recalled that, through the 1980s, the Chinese people’s attitude toward Japan was not hostile.
Things started to change, however, after the Tiananmen Square uprising of 1989, which culminated in a military crackdown. This represented an existential threat to the Communist Party, which realized that faith in Marxism had evaporated in the wake of the party’s embrace of market principles.
The abandonment of world revolution and class struggle by Deng after the death of Mao Zedong led many to lose faith in Marxism. In searching for another rationale for the party’s monopoly on power, the party decided on the use of nationalism, with such sentiments to be inculcated through patriotic education.
Things started to change, however, after the Tiananmen Square uprising of 1989, which culminated in a military crackdown. This represented an existential threat to the Communist Party, which realized that faith in Marxism had evaporated in the wake of the party’s embrace of market principles.
The abandonment of world revolution and class struggle by Deng after the death of Mao Zedong led many to lose faith in Marxism. In searching for another rationale for the party’s monopoly on power, the party decided on the use of nationalism, with such sentiments to be inculcated through patriotic education.
Japan race colonized colony Korean hygiene imperialism korea ww2 japan history racism class discrimination
Rogaski's analysis of the discourse of hygienic modernity follows the same point-counter-point nature as the colonial discourse outlined above. In supranational terms, hygienic modernity came to separate Japan from its colonies by the same clean versus dichotomy present in Meiji Japan. For example, the Japanese citizens living in colonial Korea would use hygiene to separate themselves from the indigenous Korean population Rogaski writes: "The Japanese perpetually decried the unsanitary habits of their Korean neighbors and criticized the government for not doing enough to ensure the hygienic security of Japanese....this anxiety can be attributed to the relative lack of clear boundaries of class or race between colonizer and colonized in Korea...." Just as the Western powers had used race to elevate themselves above their colonial subjects, the Japanese people felt that their hygiene made the Japanese superior to their Asian neighbors and subjects.
communists bolsheviks russia communism infiltration china ww2 mao zedong
The 28 Bolsheviks were a group of Chinese students who studied at the Moscow Sun Yat-sen University from the late 1920s until early 1935, also known as the "Returned Students". The university was founded in 1925 as a result of Kuomintang's founder Sun Yat-Sen's policy of alliance with the Soviet Union, and was named after him. The university had an important influence on modern Chinese history by educating many prominent Chinese political figures. The most famous of these were collectively called the 28 Bolsheviks.[1]
Communist infiltrated the KMT, CHINA WW2 JAPAN traitor
Sino-Soviet relations became tense as the Chinese Communists sought to infiltrate the KMT beginning in 1927. This, and the increasingly nationalist self-confidence of the Nanking government after the capture of Peking by KMT troops in the summer of 1928, led in 1929 to the attempt to transfer the CER to Chinese ownership, or at least an attempt to take full control of the railroad, which was supposed de jure to be administered jointly and yet was under Soviet administration in fact. Chang Hsueh-liang, the ruler in Manchuria, who had since become linked to the KMT government, had the Soviet consulate general in Mukden and the Soviet trad missions in Manchuria closed, confiscated the CER telegraph system, expelled several Soviet railroad employees including the director general and arrested numerous others.
general matsui mistakes ww2 not government policy japan imperial
In Japan the majority of the historical literature on Iwane Matsui's life focuses on his role in the Nanking Massacre.[116]
He has both sympathizers, who depict him as "the tragic general" who
was unjustly executed, and detractors, who assert that he had the blood
of a massacre on his hands.[3][116]
Among his detractors are the historian Yutaka Yoshida, who believes
that Matsui made six serious mistakes which contributed to the massacre.[67]
First, he insisted on advancing on Nanking without ensuring proper
logistical support which forced his men to rely on plunder. Second, he
established no policies to protect the safety of Chinese POWs. Third, he
permitted an excessively large number of soldiers to enter the city of
Nanking. Fourth, he did not cooperate sufficiently with the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone.
Fifth, he insisted that his triumphal entrance into Nanking be held at
an early date, a demand which his subordinate commanders responded to by
increasing the speed and severity of their mopping up operations.
Finally, he spent too much time on political maneuvering and neglected
his duties as commander.
Nevertheless, other historians like Masashiro Yamamoto have argued that the death sentence was too severe a penalty for Matsui's crime of mere negligence in failing to stop the massacre.[117] The journalist Richard Minear also points out that Matsui's penalty was disproportionately severe compared to the other convicted defendants. Kuniaki Koiso was found guilty on four counts and Mamoru Shigemitsu was found guilty on five counts, in both cases including one count of negligence, and both were given prison sentences.[124] Matsui, by contrast, was found guilty of only one count of negligence but was sentenced to death. The historian Tokushi Kasahara argues that the prosecution at the IMTFE did not attempt seriously to investigate all those who were involved in the Nanking Massacre, and instead just decided to make Matsui the sole scapegoat for the whole atrocity.[125]
Matsui has a somewhat infamous reputation in China today, where he is sometimes popularly referred to as "the Hitler of Japan" due to his connection to the Nanking Massacre.[126] However, Matsui's name was not always notorious in China for this reason. In 1945 the Communist Party of China denounced Matsui as a war criminal because of his promotion of pan-Asianism, but no mention was made of the Nanking Massacre.[127] Historian Masataka Matsuura notes that the focus within current scholarship on Matsui's role in the Nanking Massacre has distracted from the fact that his pan-Asianism was the defining characteristic of his life.[116]
Nevertheless, Matsui's instructions said nothing about treatment of Chinese POWs.[34][67] Matsui would inadvertently contribute to the atrocity in a major way when he demanded on December 14 that his triumphal entrance into Nanking be scheduled for the early date of December 17. At the time his subordinates in Nanking objected because they were still in the process of scrambling to apprehend all the former Chinese soldiers hiding in the city and had no facilities in which to hold them. Regardless, Matsui held firm, and in many cases his men responded to the conundrum by ordering that all their prisoners be executed immediately after capture. Most of the large-scale massacres that took place within Nanking occurred in the days immediately prior to Matsui's entrance into the city.[68]
On December 16 Matsui spent the day recovering from his malaria at
the hot springs in Tangshuizhen, a city not far from Nanking, and then
the next day he rode into Nanking itself at the head of a large victory
parade.[69]
It is not clear to what extent Matsui was aware of the atrocities
perpetrated in Nanking. His former Chief of Staff in the SEA later
testified that Matsui had been informed of "a few cases of plunder and
outrage" shortly after entering the city,[70] and Matsui's own field diary also mentions being told that Japanese troops had committed acts of rape and looting.[71] Matsui commented in his field diary that, "The truth is that some such acts are unavoidable."[72] When a representative from the Japanese Foreign Ministry
came to investigate the matter, Matsui admitted that some crimes had
occurred and he blamed his subordinate commanders for allowing too many
soldiers into the city in violation of his orders.[73]
After the war, Matsui's aide-de-camp Yoshiharu Sumi claimed that not
long after the capture of Nanking Matsui caught wind of a plan by some
of his subordinates to massacre Chinese POWs and upon hearing of this he
immediately put a stop to it.[74] However researchers have since discovered that Sumi's testimony contained a large number of inaccuracies.[75][76]
Matsui left Nanking on December 22 and returned to Shanghai, though reports of scandalous incidents perpetrated by Japanese soldiers in Nanking continued to filter in to his headquarters over the following month.[77] When Matsui returned to Nanking on February 7, 1938 for a two-day tour he assembled his subordinates, including Prince Asaka and Heisuke Yanagawa, and harangued them for failing to prevent "a number of abominable incidents within the past 50 days".[71][78][79][80]
Nevertheless, other historians like Masashiro Yamamoto have argued that the death sentence was too severe a penalty for Matsui's crime of mere negligence in failing to stop the massacre.[117] The journalist Richard Minear also points out that Matsui's penalty was disproportionately severe compared to the other convicted defendants. Kuniaki Koiso was found guilty on four counts and Mamoru Shigemitsu was found guilty on five counts, in both cases including one count of negligence, and both were given prison sentences.[124] Matsui, by contrast, was found guilty of only one count of negligence but was sentenced to death. The historian Tokushi Kasahara argues that the prosecution at the IMTFE did not attempt seriously to investigate all those who were involved in the Nanking Massacre, and instead just decided to make Matsui the sole scapegoat for the whole atrocity.[125]
Matsui has a somewhat infamous reputation in China today, where he is sometimes popularly referred to as "the Hitler of Japan" due to his connection to the Nanking Massacre.[126] However, Matsui's name was not always notorious in China for this reason. In 1945 the Communist Party of China denounced Matsui as a war criminal because of his promotion of pan-Asianism, but no mention was made of the Nanking Massacre.[127] Historian Masataka Matsuura notes that the focus within current scholarship on Matsui's role in the Nanking Massacre has distracted from the fact that his pan-Asianism was the defining characteristic of his life.[116]
The Nanking Massacre
Following the fall of Nanking, Japanese soldiers in the city massacred POWs and engaged in random acts of murder, looting, and rape which are collectively known as the Nanking Massacre.[62] Earlier Matsui and his staff officers in the CCAA had foreseen the possibility that their troops might misbehave upon entering Nanking, as many of them were poorly disciplined reservists,[63] and they were especially intent on ensuring that the property and citizens of third party nations were not harmed in order to avoid causing an international incident.[60] To forestall this possibility, Matsui tacked a lengthy addendum entitled "Essentials for Assaulting Nanking" onto the comprehensive operational orders that he passed down to all units on December 7.[63][64] In "Essentials" Matsui instructed each of his divisions to only allow one of their regiments into the city itself in order to reduce the Japanese Army's contact with Chinese civilians, and he reminded all his subordinates that criminal acts like looting or arson would be severely punished.[63][65] Ultimately, Matsui's orders were again disobeyed.[63][66] Most of the buildings and civilian homes outside Nanking had been burned down by the Chinese Army to deprive the Japanese of shelter, so Matsui's subordinate commanders decided on their own that they had no choice but to station all their men within the city itself.[63]Nevertheless, Matsui's instructions said nothing about treatment of Chinese POWs.[34][67] Matsui would inadvertently contribute to the atrocity in a major way when he demanded on December 14 that his triumphal entrance into Nanking be scheduled for the early date of December 17. At the time his subordinates in Nanking objected because they were still in the process of scrambling to apprehend all the former Chinese soldiers hiding in the city and had no facilities in which to hold them. Regardless, Matsui held firm, and in many cases his men responded to the conundrum by ordering that all their prisoners be executed immediately after capture. Most of the large-scale massacres that took place within Nanking occurred in the days immediately prior to Matsui's entrance into the city.[68]
Iwane Matsui riding into Nanking on December 17
Matsui left Nanking on December 22 and returned to Shanghai, though reports of scandalous incidents perpetrated by Japanese soldiers in Nanking continued to filter in to his headquarters over the following month.[77] When Matsui returned to Nanking on February 7, 1938 for a two-day tour he assembled his subordinates, including Prince Asaka and Heisuke Yanagawa, and harangued them for failing to prevent "a number of abominable incidents within the past 50 days".[71][78][79][80]
chinese empathy man exception emotion idealist
http://abcnews.go.com/US/chicago-pediatric-surgeon-dies-lake-michigan-resue-attempt/story?id=16940866
http://www.chinasmack.com/2012/stories/man-rescues-drowning-family-who-then-leave-while-he-drowns.html
http://www.chinasmack.com/2012/stories/man-rescues-drowning-family-who-then-leave-while-he-drowns.html
no difference between creativity and intelligence among gifted east asians and whites
Comparing the intelligence and creativity scores of Asian American gifted students with Caucasian gifted students
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of academically talented Asian American and Caucasian 4th through 6th-grade students on measures of creativity and intelligence. Additionally this study investigated if there were any gender differences in measures of creativity and intelligence. Seventy-one Asian American students and seventy-five Caucasian students participated in this study. The mean age for the Asian American students was 10.37 (SD = .49), and the mean age for the Caucasian students was 9.89 (SD = .78). There were 77 females and 69 males that participated. Among the Asian American students there were 33 Chinese American students, 17 Korean American students, 9 Japanese American students, and 12 Southeast Asian (Laotian, Cambodian and Vietnamese) students. Participants were administered two instruments. The Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) was used to measure intelligence. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT), Form A was used to measure creativity. ANCOVA and Pearson Product Moment Correlations were used to analyze the results. Findings of the study indicated that there were no statistical or practical significant differences in measures of intelligence and creativity for race or gender. Additionally, findings suggested that there were no statistical or practical significant differences in measures of intelligence and creativity among the Asian American subgroups. Implications of the findings for the field of gifted education are also discussed. ^Degree
Ph.D.Advisors
Sidney M. Moon, Purdue University.Subject Area
Education, Educational Psychology|Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studiesneedham technology lynn innovation creativity
Needham researched Chinese Science and inventions, and concluded its
likely over half of the modern worlds ideas originated from China, While
Rushton stated East Asians have been ahead of Europeans throughout most
of history, and Europeans only recently pulled ahead in the last 300
years,calling it an anomaly.
conservatism asian aversion to war
We speculate that the association of gray matter volume of the amygdala
and anterior cingulate cortex with political attitudes that we observed
may reflect emotional and cognitive traits of individuals that influence
their inclination to certain political orientations. For example, our
findings are consistent with the proposal that political orientation is
associated with psychological processes for managing fear and
uncertainty. The amygdala has many functions, including fear processing.
Individuals with a large amygdala are more sensitive to fear, which,
taken together with our findings, might suggest the testable hypothesis
that individuals with larger
amygdala are more inclined to integrate conservative views into their belief system…. Similarly, it is striking that conservatives are more sensitive to disgust, and the insula is involved in the feeling of disgust. On the other hand, our finding of an association between anterior cingulate cortex volume and political attitudes may be linked with tolerance to uncertainty. One of the functions of the anterior cingulate cortex is to monitor uncertainty and conflicts. Thus, it is conceivable that individuals with a larger ACC have a higher capacity to tolerate uncertainty and conflicts, allowing them to accept more liberal views. Such speculations provide a basis for theorizing about the psychological constructs (and their neural substrates) underlying political attitudes. However, it should be noted that every brain region, including those identified here, invariably participates in multiple psychological processes. It is therefore not possible to unambiguously infer from involvement of a particular brain area that a particular psychological process must be involved.
One of the odder aspects of present-day politics is the assumption
that if you are antiwar you are on the left, and if you are conservative
you are “pro-war.” Like labelling conservative states red and liberal
states blue, this is an inversion of historical practice.
The opposition to America’s entry into both World Wars was largely led by conservatives. Senator Robert A. Taft, the standard-bearer of postwar conservatism, opposed war unless the United States itself was attacked. Even Bismarck, after he had fought and won the three wars he needed to unify Germany, was staunchly antiwar. He once described preventive war, like the one America is being pressured to wage on Iran, as “committing suicide for fear of being killed.”
Conservatives’ detestation of war has no “touchy-feely” origins. It springs from conservatism’s roots, its most fundamental beliefs and objectives. Conservatism seeks above all social and cultural continuity, and nothing endangers that more than war.
amygdala are more inclined to integrate conservative views into their belief system…. Similarly, it is striking that conservatives are more sensitive to disgust, and the insula is involved in the feeling of disgust. On the other hand, our finding of an association between anterior cingulate cortex volume and political attitudes may be linked with tolerance to uncertainty. One of the functions of the anterior cingulate cortex is to monitor uncertainty and conflicts. Thus, it is conceivable that individuals with a larger ACC have a higher capacity to tolerate uncertainty and conflicts, allowing them to accept more liberal views. Such speculations provide a basis for theorizing about the psychological constructs (and their neural substrates) underlying political attitudes. However, it should be noted that every brain region, including those identified here, invariably participates in multiple psychological processes. It is therefore not possible to unambiguously infer from involvement of a particular brain area that a particular psychological process must be involved.
Social conservatism is one of the more
deep set of the 'Asian values' uncovered in this study. It extends
its hold far beyond the political conservatives who championed the
overt 'Asian values' discourse. Social conservatism reaches deep into
the ranks of people who appear to the Western eye to be social and
political innovators: sometimes taking the form of ethical
conservatism often as concern for strong, cohesive families. It is
well to remember that it is not just Lee Kuan Yew and Dr Mahathir who
champion strong families, but also the secular feminists of Thailand.
Furthermore,despite decades of Westernisation, modernization
widespread promiscuity, and the ready availability of contraceptives
and abortion, even Japanese society remains steadfast in the value it
places on family cohesion and socially ascribed gender roles. But
despite the breadth of the appeal of social conservatism, it seems
unlikely that the ethical challenges and the social atomism that seem
to be the inevitable companions of capitalism and modernity.
The opposition to America’s entry into both World Wars was largely led by conservatives. Senator Robert A. Taft, the standard-bearer of postwar conservatism, opposed war unless the United States itself was attacked. Even Bismarck, after he had fought and won the three wars he needed to unify Germany, was staunchly antiwar. He once described preventive war, like the one America is being pressured to wage on Iran, as “committing suicide for fear of being killed.”
Conservatives’ detestation of war has no “touchy-feely” origins. It springs from conservatism’s roots, its most fundamental beliefs and objectives. Conservatism seeks above all social and cultural continuity, and nothing endangers that more than war.
taoism evil morality christianism
Evil exists only in relation to good. Jung discarded privatio boni with the logical argument that if "good" is real, its opposite must also be real, with the same "relative" reality of any pairs of opposites, such as left and right, or white and black. Buddhism and Hinduism refer to this fundamental condition of the universe as "duality"; good does not exist except in relation to evil, just as the word "up" has no meaning without the notion of the word "down." Taoism offers the idea that the tao is a balanced state in which neither good nor evil exist; it is only when we become aware of "good" that we must also simultaneously become aware of "evil."
>christianity had a very narrow view of morality, that's why christianism led to all sorts of violence, because it did not have a good understanding of how the notion of good and bad is relative. it didn't preach tolerance, it preached violence. the fact is good and bad are both necessary to maintain harmony within the world. a society that's purely good cannot sustain in a world that's finite.
asian parenting detrimental iq genius intelligence strict upbringing
What have we learned tiger parenting?
Tiger parenting is a little different than authoritarian parenting in that tiger parenting includes high levels of negative parenting (e.g., strict rules) and high levels of positive parenting (e.g., warmth and support). Scholarly research on “tiger parenting” began after the publication of Amy Chua's book in which the concept of tiger parenting was introduced. In March 2013, the Asian American Journal of Psychology, one of the American Psychological Association's journals, published a collection of six empirical papers and two commentaries – using samples of Hmong, Chinese, and Korean American parents all aimed at testing the new theory of “tiger parenting.” The goal was to use scientific methods to test whether tiger parenting is a common parenting style in Asian families, and to test whether tiger parenting leads to positive outcomes for children. Overall, these studies showed that parenting in each of these cultures is a mix of power-assertive type parenting and supportive parenting. The purely power-assertive type of parenting described in Chua's book was not common. But, what about the children? What kind of parenting is best for child outcomes? The best way to answer this question is to have a large sample, so that there are a variety of types of parenting represented, and we want data over time. We want a large sample so that we can link different types of parenting with different child outcomes. We want a longitudinal study ; that is, we want data over time so that we can see how different types of parenting influence a child's development over time. If we only have data from one time point, then we cannot say whether parenting is leading to child outcomes or perhaps different types of children influence how their parents behave. Fortunately, we had a longitudinal study we could use to address these questions.We defined tiger parents as those who practice positive and negative parenting strategies simultaneously. Tiger parents are engaging in some positive parenting behaviors; however, unlike supportive parents, tiger parents also scored high on negative parenting dimensions. This means that their positive parenting strategies co-exist with negative parenting strategies.
Tiger parents and harsh parents are alike, in that both use negative parenting strategies. Unlike tiger parents, however, harsh parents do not engage in positive parenting strategies. Easygoing parents have a more “hands-off” approach, and do not engage as much with their children, either positively or negatively.
What are the main study findings?
Despite the popular perception of Asian American parents as “tiger” parents, we found that supportive parents made up the largest percentage of parents at each data collection wave.Although there is a popular perception that the secret behind the academic success of Asian American children is the prevalence of “tiger moms” like Amy Chua, we found that children with tiger parents actually had a lower GPA than children with supportive parents. In fact, children with supportive parents show the highest GPA, the best socio-emotional adjustment, the least amount of alienation from parents, and the strongest sense of family obligation among the four parenting profiles. Thus, our findings debunk the myths about the merits of tiger parenting. Children with supportive parents show the best developmental outcomes. Children of easygoing parents show better developmental outcomes than those with tiger parents. Children with harsh parents show the worst developmental outcomes.
buddhist quote funny philosophy imageboard thought
"An evil man does wrong, but unbeknown to him he also does good in his
evil acts as in the greater scheme of things good cannot exist without
its opposite. You should not feel hatred for the evil man as he is as
important as one who does good."
buddha buddhism religion west east asians westerners
Taoism and Buddhism teach us that both good and bad are necessary for the harmony of this world. There is no distinction between good and bad as both are cogs that are necessary for existence to be. Because of this, practitioners are led to believe we should not judge a person from his past actions, but we can teach him love, understanding and moderation, the last of which Westerners completely lack.
To better understand why Taoists and Buddhist are accepting of good and bad people, let us consider a simple thought experiment. If all people on earth were good and generous and no wealth disparity existed, human society would grow incessantly, grow too much in fact, so much so that the earth would be overpopulated and nature destroyed. This is why good and bad are indistinguishable in the larger view of things, both good and bad do good and bad in the big scheme of things. Asians realized this because they were holistic. Westerners haven't realized this yet because they are analytic.
richest doctor patrick generous kind moral cancer cure nano forbes medical breakthrough chinese
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccZZf4Xzp3U
korean no incest
Not being able to marry a person with the same
family name is a special burden in South Korea, where 22 percent of
South Korea's 44 million people are named Kim. The figure leaps to 55
percent after adding in Park, Lee, Choi and Chong.
Actually, although same-name marriages are frowned
upon, it is same-clan marriages that are legally banned, and it is
possible to have the same name, like Kim, but be from a different clan
or village. But nearly 40 percent of the population apparently comes
from one of three large clans: the Kim clan from a village called
Kimhae, the Lee clan from Chonju and the Park clan from Milyang.
For centuries, South Korea has had a law barring
couples with the same name and the same ancestral village from marrying.
Although this was probably originally conceived as a way of preventing
incest, it has developed into a strong ostracism of same-clan marriages.
Separately, there is a law against incest that prevents marriages
between relatives up to third cousins, but for purists that is not
enough.
NO INCEST IN KOREA
There are some cultures in Asia which stigmatize cousin marriage, in
some instances even marriages between second cousins or more remotely
related people. This is notably true in the culture of Korea. In South
Korea, before 1997, anyone with the same last name and clan were
prohibited from marriage. In light of this law being held
unconstitutional, South Korea now only prohibits up to third cousins
(see Article 809 of the Korean Civil Code).
South Korea produces more engineers than the U.S.
The trade-off for financial security is academic rigor that many U.S.
students choose to avoid. Each year, South Korea graduates more
engineers than the United States, Bock said. Studies show that one in
four South Korean college students major in engineering. In the U.S.,
the figure is one in 20.
jomon ancestry japan
A new study released in 2013 by Kanzawa-Kiriyama Hideaki shows that the Jomon are genetically closer to Papuans and Melanesians, populations located in Oceania.[59]
The author also suggested that the Jomon have significant Denisovan
admixture, which is also found among Papuans, Melanesians and some Negrito ethnic groups in the Philippines.[59]
japan inventions trilateral patent wipo innovation innovative
In recognition of World Intellectual Property Day on April 26, 2007, Thomson Scientific reviews the massive increase in technology innovations developed globally over the past ten years (1997-2006), highlighting tri-lateral inventions or inventions that have been filed in the U.S., Europe and Japan. Examining the patent landscape is an excellent way to measure the evolution of global technology innovations. As our research shows, there has been a noticeable rise in innovations in many areas of technology, though Japan seems to dominate overall by holding the majority share of inventions across all technologies.
h index computer science ranking scientists
154
Herbert A. Simon (CMU), Nobel Laureate, Turing Award, ACM Fellow
144 Anil K. Jain (Michigan State U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
131 Jiawei Han (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
126 Scott Shenker (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
124 David Haussler (UC Santa Cruz), ISCB Fellow
120 Terrence Sejnowski (UCSD), IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the Institute of Medicine, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
118 Hector Garcia-Molina (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
118 Takeo Kanade (CMU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
115 Philip S. Yu (UIC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
113 Don Towsley (U Mass, Amherst), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
112 Wil van der Aalst (TU Eindhoven), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Member of the Royal Holland Society of Sciences and Humanities
112 Steven Salzberg (Johns Hopkins U), AAAS Fellow, ISCB Fellow
111 Tomaso Poggio (MIT)
110 Deborah Estrin (Cornell NYC Tech), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
110 Sebastian Thrun (Stanford), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
109 Ian Foster (Argonne National Laboratory & U Chicago), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow, BCS Fellow
108 Stephen Grossberg (Boston University)
108 Michael I. Jordan (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, SIAM Fellow
107 David Culler (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
107 Didier Dubois (CNRS Toulouse)
107 Henri Prade (CNRS Toulouse)
106 Andrew Zisserman (University of Oxford), Fellow of the Royal Society
105 Geoffrey E. Hinton (U Toronto), Fellow of the Royal Society, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Fellow of the Royal Society, FRSC, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
105 HongJiang Zhang (KingSoft, China), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, ACM SIGMM Technical Achievement Award, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
104 Christos H. Papadimitriou (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
104 Alex Pentland (MIT), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
103 Nick Jennings (U Southampton), IEEE Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
102 Bernhard Schölkopf (Max Planck)
101 Stanley Osher (UCLA), Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow
100 Mario Gerla (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
100 Georgios Giannakis (U Minnesota), IEEE Fellow
100 John A. Stankovic (U Virginia), ACM Fellow
97 Jack Dongarra (U Tennessee), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, SIAM Fellow, AAAS Fellow
95 Shree Nayar (Columbia), Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
94 Martin Vetterli (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
92 Richard Karp (Berkeley), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
92 Alex Szalay (Johns Hopkins U)
92 Lotfi Zadeh (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
90 Vipin Kumar (U Minnesota), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
89 Jitendra Malik (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
89 Jeffrey D. Ullman (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
88 Luc Van Gool (ETH Zurich)
87 Hari Balakrishnan (MIT), ACM Fellow
86 Rajkumar Buyya (University of Melbourne, Australia), IEEE Medal for Excellence in Scalable Computing
86 Thomas A. Henzinger (IST Austria), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
86 Randy H. Katz (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
86 Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
86 Moshe Y. Vardi (Rice U), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
85 Ian F. Akyildiz (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
84 Olivier Faugeras (INRIA), Member of the French Academy of Sciences
84 David E. Goldberg (UIUC)
84 Francisco Herrera (U Granada, Spain)
84 Shankar Sastry (Berkeley)
83 Kalyanmoy Deb (Michigan State U), IEEE Fellow, ASME Fellow
83 Sushil Jajodia (George Mason U), IEEE Fellow
82 Marco Dorigo (U Libre de Bruxelles), IEEE Fellow, ECCAI Fellow, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
82 Mark Horowitz (Stanford), ACM Fellow
82 Robert Tarjan (Princeton), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
81 Rakesh Agrawal (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
81 Noga Alon (Tel Aviv U)
81 Amit Sheth (Wright State U), IEEE Fellow
81 Ben Shneiderman (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
80 Martin Abadi (Google and UC Santa Cruz ), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow
80 Mihir Bellare (UCSD), ACM Fellow, IACR Fellow
80 Alon Halevy [Alon Levy] (Google), ACM Fellow
80 Daphne Koller (Stanford), MacArthur Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, ACM Infosys Foundation Award
80 Mani B. Srivastava (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
80 Katia Sycara (CMU), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow
80 Jennifer Widom (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
79 Rama Chellappa (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow, OSA Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 Tim Finin (UMBC), AAAI Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 Dinesh Manocha (UNC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
78 Klaus-Robert Müller (TU Berlin)
78 Hermann Ney (RWTH Aachen), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 David A. Patterson (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 Mihalis Yannakakis (Columbia), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
77 Jose Joaquin Garcia-Luna-Aceves (UC Santa Cruz and PARC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Corresponding Member of the Mexican Academy Sciences, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
77 Thomas S. Huang (UIUC), IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
77 Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia), ACM Fellow
77 Lixia Zhang (UCLA), ACM Fellow
76 Gene H. Golub (Stanford)
76 Richard Szeliski (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
75 Ken Kennedy (Rice U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
75 Rajeev Motwani (Stanford), ACM Fellow
75 Mubarak Shah (U Central Florida), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow
75 Witold Pedrycz (U Alberta), IEEE Fellow
74 W. Bruce Croft (U Mass, Amherst), ACM Fellow
74 Fred Glover (U Colorado)
74 Donald E. Knuth (Stanford), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
74 Hans-Peter Seidel (Max Planck)
73 Andrew Blake (Microsoft), Fellow of the Royal Society
73 John M. Carroll (Penn State U)
73 Ian Horrocks (Oxford U), Fellow of the Royal Society
73 Robert Kraut (CMU), ACM Fellow
73 Giovanni De Micheli (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
73 Biswanath Mukherjee (UC Davis)
73 Klara Nahrstedt (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
73 Burkhard Rost (TU Munich)
72 Rajeev Alur (U Penn), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
72 Nicholas Ayache (INRIA)
72 Alexander J. Smola (CMU)
71 Monica S. Lam (Stanford), ACM Fellow
71 Azriel Rosenfeld (U Maryland), ACM Fellow
71 Barry Smith (SUNY Buffalo)
71 Demetri Terzopoulos (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the European Academy of Sciences, FRSC
71 Jie Wu (Temple U), IEEE Fellow
71 Ronald Yager (Iona College), IEEE Fellow
70 Richard Baraniuk (Rice U), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
70 Hsinchun Chen (U Arizona), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
70 Ronald Fagin (IBM Almaden), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, ACM SIGMOD Edgar F. Codd Innovations Award, IEEE Technical Achievement Award, IEEE W. Wallace McDowell Award
70 Jim Gray (Microsoft), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
70 David Karger (MIT), ACM Fellow
70 Judea Pearl (UCLA), Turing Award, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
70 H. Vincent Poor (Princeton)
70 Prabhakar Raghavan (Yahoo! Research), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
70 Adi Shamir (Weizmann), Turing Award, IACR Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
70 Kishor S. Trivedi (Duke U), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
70 Moti Yung (Google), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IACR Fellow
70 Terry Winograd (Stanford)
69 Tarek Abdelzaher (UIUC)
69 Thomas Anderson (U Washington), ACM Fellow
69 James Bezdek (U West Florida), IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
69 H. V. Jagadish (U Michigan), ACM Fellow
69 Jon Kleinberg (Cornell), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, MacArthur Fellow, ACM Infosys Foundation Award, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, ACM-AAAI Allen Newell Award
69 Edward A. Lee (Berkeley)
69 Pavel Pevzner (UCSD), ACM Fellow, ISCB Fellow
68 Serge Abiteboul (INRIA), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
68 Pascal Fua (EPFL), IEEE Fellow
68 Markus Gross (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow, Member of the German Academy of Sciences
68 Eric Horvitz (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
68 Olvi L. Mangasarian (U Wisconsin)
68 Vern Paxson (ICSI), ACM Fellow
68 Ronald L. Rivest (MIT), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
68 Kang G. Shin (U Michigan), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
68 Eduardo Sontag (Rutgers), IEEE Fellow
68 Nitin Vaidya (UIUC)
68 John von Neumann (Princeton)
67 Pierre Baldi (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow, AAAI Fellow, IEEE Fellow, ISCB Fellow
67 Anantha Chandrakasan (MIT)
67 Shih-Fu Chang (Columbia), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award
67 William Freeman (MIT), IEEE Fellow
67 Ramesh Govindan (USC), ACM Fellow
67 Andrew B. Kahng (UCSD), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
67 Maurizio Lenzerini (Sapienza U di Roma), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
67 Thomas W. Reps (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
67 Chris Taylor (U Manchester)
67 Jeffrey Vitter (U Kansas), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
67 Alex Waibel (CMU and U Karlsruhe)
66 Ricardo Baeza-Yates (Yahoo Labs), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
66 Elisa Bertino (Purdue U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
66 Dan Boneh (Stanford), ACM Infosys Foundation Award, IACR Fellow
66 William Dally (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Fellow of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
66 Sajal K. Das (Missouri University of Science and Tech), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
66 Martial Hebert (CMU)
66 John Mylopoulos (U Toronto), FRSC
66 Allen Newell (CMU), Turing Award, IEEE Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
66 Michael Wooldridge (U Liverpool), AAAI Fellow
65 Wolfram Burgard (U Freiburg)
65 Anoop Gupta (Microsoft)
65 Jean-Pierre Hubaux (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
65 Anupam Joshi (U Maryland, Baltimore County)
65 Nick McKeown (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
65 Sankar K. Pal (Indian Statistical Institute), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
65 Steffen Staab (U Koblenz-Landau)
65 Ion Stoica (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
65 Haim J. Wolfson (Tel Aviv U)
64 Luca Benini (U Bologna)
64 Andrew Campbell (Dartmouth)
64 Larry Davis (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
64 Susan Dumais (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
64 Joseph Y. Halpern (Cornell), ACM Fellow
64 George Karypis (U Minnesota)
64 James Hendler (RPI), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow, BCS Fellow
64 Dimitris Metaxas (Rutgers), Fellow of American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineers
64 Adrian Perrig (ETH Zurich)
64 Raghu Ramakrishnan (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
64 Cordelia Schmid (INRIA)
64 Ivan Stojmenovic (U Ottawa), IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
64 George Varghese (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Kobayashi Award, ACM SIGCOMM Lifetime Award
64 Zhi-Hua Zhou (Nanjing U), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
63 Hojjat Adeli (Ohio State U), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
63 Christophe Diot (Thomson Technology Paris Lab), ACM Fellow
63 Nir Friedman (Hebrew U of Jerusalem)
63 David S. Johnson (AT&T Labs), ACM Fellow, SIAM Fellow
63 Sara Kiesler (CMU), ACM Fellow
63 Ming C. Lin (UNC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
63 Andrew McCallum (U Mass, Amherst), AAAI Fellow
63 Theodore S. Rappaport (NYU)
63 Michael Reiter (UNC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
63 Daniel Thalmann (EPFL)
62 Jason Cong (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
62 Tim Cootes (U Manchester)
62 Erol Gelenbe (Imperial College, London), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, SIGMETRICS Life-Time Achievement Award, Member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences, Member of the Hungarian Academy of Scences, Member of the French National Academy of Engineering, Chevalier de la Legion d'Honneur, Member of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Member of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Letters and Arts of Belgium
62 C. Lee Giles (Penn State), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
62 William Gropp (UIUC) ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, SIAM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
62 Gabor Herman (City University of New York), IEEE Fellow
62 Janusz Kacprzyk (Polish Academy of Sciences), IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
62 C.-C. Jay Kuo (USC), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, SPIE Fellow
62 Larry Peterson (Princeton), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
62 Tieniu Tan (Chinese Academy of Sciences), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
62 Douglas C. Schmidt (Vanderbilt University)
62 Lothar Thiele (ETH Zurich)
62 Michael Unser (EPFL)
62 Yorick Wilks (IHMC, Florida)
61 Norman I. Badler (U Penn)
61 Jon Crowcroft (U Cambridge), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Society
61 Srinivas Devadas (MIT), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
61 Oren Etzioni (U Washington)
61 Dieter Fox (U Washington)
61 Michael Franklin (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
61 Saul Greenberg (University of Calgary), Member of the ACM CHI Academy
61 Pat Hanrahan (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
61 Henry Kautz (Rochester), ACM Fellow
61 Kai Li (Princeton), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
61 Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann (U Geneva)
61 Chunming Qiao (SUNY Buffalo), IEEE Fellow
61 Kaushik Roy (Purdue U)
61 Russell H. Taylor (Johns Hopkins U)
61 Roger Wattenhofer (ETH Zurich)
61 Alan Yuille (UCLA)
60 Ross Anderson (U Cambridge), Fellow of the Royal Society
60 David Dill (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
60 Wen Gao (Peking U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
60 Wen-Mei W. Hwu (UIUC), ACM Fellow
60 Frank Leymann (U Stuttgart)
60 K. J. Ray Liu (U Maryland), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
60 Zohar Manna (Stanford), ACM Fellow
60 Lionel Ni (Hong Kong U of Science and Tech)
60 Stefan Savage (UCSD), ACM Fellow
60 Dan Suciu (U Washington), ACM Fellow
60 Yiyu Yao (U Regina)
59 Mohamed-Slim Alouini (KAUST)
59 Daniel Bobrow (Xerox), ACM Fellow
59 Carole Goble (U Manchester)
59 Henry Levy (U Washington), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
59 Huan Liu (Arizona State U)
59 Silvio Micali (MIT), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
59 David Tse (Berkeley)
59 Jonathan Turner (Washington U, St Louis), ACM Fellow
59 Manuela Veloso (CMU)
59 Philip Wadler (U Edinburgh), ACM Fellow
59 Daniel S. Weld (U Washington), ACM Fellow
58 Mostafa H. Ammar (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
58 Eric Brewer (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
58 Luca Cardelli (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Fellow of the Royal Society
58 Peter Druschel (Max Planck), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
58 Ronald Fedkiw (Stanford), Academy Award from The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
58 Mark D. Hill (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
58 Ramesh Jain (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow
58 David B. Johnson (Rice U)
58 Arie Kaufman (SUNY Stony Brook), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
58 Wenke Lee (Georgia Tech)
58 Pattie Maes (MIT)
58 Noam Nisan (Hebrew U)
58 John Reif (Duke U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
58 Jennifer Rexford (Princeton), ACM Fellow
58 Amin Vahdat (UCSD), ACM Fellow
58 David Wagner (Berkeley)
57 Alfred V. Aho (Columbia U), ACM Fellow
57 Gustavo Alonso (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
57 Michael J. Black (Brown U)
57 Avrim Blum (CMU), ACM Fellow
57 Jean-Yves Le Boudec (EPFL)
57 James Demmel (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, SIAM Fellow, Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award
57 Stuart K. Card (Xerox)
57 David Fogel (Natural Selection), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award
57 David K. Gifford (MIT)
57 Mark Handley (U College London)
57 Robert Haralick (City U of New York)
57 David Harel (Weizmann), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
57 Somesh Jha (U Wisconsin)
57 Leslie Lamport (Microsoft), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
57 Steve Lawrence (Google)
57 Tom Leighton (MIT), Member of the National Academy of Engineering, SIAM Fellow
57 Tom Mitchell (CMU)
57 Jason H. Moore (Dartmouth), AAAS Fellow, Kavli Fellow
57 Wolfgang Nejdl (L3S Research Center, Hannover)
57 Rafail Ostrovsky (UCLA), IACR Fellow
57 Massoud Pedram (USC)
57 David Salesin (Adobe Systems), ACM Fellow
57 Tuomas Sandholm (CMU), ACM Fellow
57 Padhraic Smyth (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
57 Andrew S. Tanenbaum (Vrije U, The Netherlands), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
57 Walter Willinger (Bell Labs), ACM Fellow, SIAM Fellow
57 Xin Yao (U Birmingham), IEEE Fellow
57 Michele Zorzi (U Padova), IEEE Fellow
56 Gregory D. Abowd (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, ACM SIGCHI Academy
56 Alan Burns (U York)
56 Stefano Ceri (Politecnico di Milano), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
56 Bernard Chazelle (Princeton), ACM Fellow
56 Ingemar J. Cox (U College London), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Rachid Deriche (INRIA)
56 Dieter Fensel (Innsbruck U)
56 David Garlan (CMU), ACM Fellow
56 Dimitrios Gunopulos (U Athens)
56 Kim G. Larsen (Aalborg U)
56 Songwu Lu (UCLA)
56 Raymond Mooney (UT Austin), ACM Fellow
56 Brad Myers (CMU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Pietro Perona (Cal Tech)
56 Miodrag Potkonjak (UCLA)
56 Rajeev Rastogi (Amazon), ACM Fellow
56 Daniela Rus (MIT), ACM Fellow, MacArthur Fellow
56 Sartaj Sahni (U Florida), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Hanan Samet (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Ravi Sandhu (UT San Antonio), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
56 Dennis Shasha (NYU), ACM Fellow
56 Prashant Shenoy (U Mass, Amherst)
56 Ian Witten (U Waikato), ACM Fellow
56 Yang Xiao (U Alabama)
55 Michael Cohen (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
55 Daniel Cohen-Or (Tel Aviv U)
55 Stefan Decker (National U Ireland)
55 Pedro Domingos (U Washington)
55 Philippe Flajolet (INRIA), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
55 Tao Jiang (UC Riverside), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow
55 David Kotz (Dartmouth)
55 Jeff Kramer (Imperial College, London), ACM Fellow
55 Ravi Kumar (Google)
55 H. T. Kung (Harvard), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
55 Sharad Malik (Princeton), ACM Fellow
55 B. S. Manjunath (UC Santa Barbara), IEEE Fellow
55 Alex Nicolau (UC Irvine), IEEE Fellow
55 David Padua (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
55 David Peleg (Weizmann)
55 Philip Rogaway (UC Davis), IACR Fellow
55 Gerard Salton (Cornell), ACM Fellow
55 Joseph Sifakis (EPFL), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
55 Nigel Shadbolt (U Southampton)
55 Salvatore Stolfo (Columbia)
55 Milind Tambe (USC), ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow
55 Vladimir Vapnik (Royal Holloway, U London) Member of the National Academy of Engineering, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
55 Geoffrey Voelker (UCSD)
54 Chandrajit Bajaj (UT Austin), ACM Fellow
54 David Blaauw (U Michigan)
54 Ran Canetti (Tel Aviv U)
54 John Canny (Berkeley)
54 Imrich Chlamtac (U Trento)
54 Trevor Darrell (Berkeley)
54 Ahmed Elmagarmid (Purdue U and Qatar Computing Research Inst), ACM Fellow
54 David Heckerman (Microsoft and UCLA), ACM Fellow
54 Kurt Keutzer (Berkeley), IEEE Fellow
54 Fernando C. N. Pereira (U Penn)
54 Amir Pnueli (Weizmann and New York University), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
54 Marc Pollefeys (ETH Zurich), IEEE Fellow
54 Mary Beth Rosson (Penn State U)
54 Abraham Silberschatz (Yale), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
54 Barry Smyth (U College Dublin)
54 Andreas Stolcke (Microsoft)
54 Gene Tsudik (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
53 Ajith Abraham (MIR Labs)
53 Pankaj K. Agarwal (Duke U), ACM Fellow
53 Divyakant Agrawal (UC Santa Barbara), ACM Fellow
53 Shun-ichi Amari (Riken)
53 David Cheriton (Stanford)
53 Mark Crovella (Boston University), ACM Fellow
53 Dipankar Dasgupta (U Memphis), IEEE Fellow
53 Sally Floyd (ICSI), ACM Fellow
53 Giuseppe De Giacomo (Sapienza U di Roma)
53 Georg Gottlob (University of Oxford), ACM Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Society, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
53 Frank van Harmelen (Vrije U, The Netherlands)
53 John Heidemann (USC/ISI)
53 Craig Knoblock (USC)
53 Laks V.S. Lakshmanan (U British Columbia)
53 James Larus (EPFL), ACM Fellow
53 Michael L. Littman (Rutgers)
53 Zbigniew Michalewicz (U Adelaide)
53 Michael Mitzenmacher (Harvard), ACM Fellow
53 Michael Pazzani (Rutgers)
53 Rosalind Picard (MIT)
53 Manfred Reichert (Ulm U)
53 Amit Sahai (UCLA)
53 John R. Smith (IBM Research)
53 Divesh Srivastava (AT&T Labs), ACM Fellow
53 Gaurav Sukhatme (USC)
53 Subhash Suri (UC Santa Barbara), ACM Fellow
53 Enrique Herrera Viedma (U Granada)
53 Michael P. Wellman (U Michigan), ACM Fellow
53 Gio Wiederhold (Stanford), ACM Fellow
52 James F. Allen (U Rochester)
52 Eitan Altman (INRIA Sophia-Antipolis), IEEE Fellow
52 Serge Belongie (Cornell Tech in NYC and UCSD)
52 Roberto Cipolla (U Cambridge)
52 Carlos A. C. Coello (CINVESTAV-IPN, Mexico), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award
52 William W. Cohen (CMU)
52 Erik Demaine (MIT)
52 Thomas Dietterich (Oregon State U), ACM Fellow
52 Danny Dolev (Hebrew U), ACM Fellow
52 Thomas Eiter (TU Vienna)
52 Johannes Gehrke (Cornell), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
52 Phillip Gibbons (Intel), ACM Fellow
52 Donald Greenberg (Cornell U)
52 Jonathan Grudin (Microsoft)
52 Rajesh Gupta (UCSD), IEEE Fellow
52 John Hennessy (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
52 Charles E. Leiserson (MIT), ACM Fellow
52 Jure Leskovec (Stanford)
52 Marc Levoy (Stanford)
52 Theo Pavlidis (SUNY Stony Brook), IEEE Fellow
52 Peter Patel-Schneider (Nuance Communications)
52 Gordon Plotkin (U Edinburgh), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
52 Jan M. Rabaey (Berkeley)
52 Gunnar Ratsch (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)
52 John Riedl (U Minnesota), ACM Fellow
52 Keith Ross (Polytechnic Institute of NYU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
52 Dan Roth (UIUC), ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow, ACL Fellow
52 Pierangela Samarati (U Milano)
52 Alejandro Schaffer (National Institutes of Health)
52 Carlo Zaniolo (UCLA)
52 Qian Zhang (Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech), IEEE Fellow
51 Dharma P. Agrawal (U Cincinnati), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
51 Baruch Awerbuch (Johns Hopkins U)
51 Joachim Buhmann (ETH Zurich)
51 Kevin Bowyer (U Notre Dame), IEEE Fellow
51 Peter Brusilovsky (U Pittsburgh and CMU)
51 Brad Calder (Microsoft)
51 Diego Calvanese (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)
51 Fabio Casati (U Trento)
51 Peter Denning (Naval Postgraduate School), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, past ACM President
51 Stephanie Forrest (U New Mexico)
51 Zoubin Ghahramani (U Cambridge / CMU)
51 Ron Graham (UCSD), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Sciences
51 Rachid Guerraoui (EPFL), ACM Fellow
51 Rajiv Gupta (UC Riverside), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
51 Joseph M. Hellerstein (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
51 Piotr Indyk (MIT)
51 Hisao Ishibuchi (Osaka Prefecture University), IEEE Fellow)
51 Norman Jouppi (HP Labs), ACM Fellow
51 Kevin Knight (USC)
51 David Kriegman (UCSD)
51 Der-Tsai Lee (National Chung Hsing University), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of TWAS
51 Xiang-Yang Li (Illinois Institute of Tech)
51 Steven Low (Cal Tech)
51 Wei-Ying Ma (Microsoft)
51 Christopher Manning (Stanford), ACM Fellow
51 Ueli Maurer (ETH Zurich), IEEE Fellow, IACR Fellow, Member of the German Academy of Sciences
51 Thomas P. Moran (IBM), ACM Fellow
51 Vijaykrishnan Narayanan (Penn State), ACM Fellow
51 Badri Nath [B R Badrinath] (Rutgers)
51 Lionel M. Ni (Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech), IEEE Fellow
51 Venkata N. Padmanabhan (Microsoft Research), IEEE Fellow, Member of the Indian National Academy of Engineering
51 Jordan Pollack (Brandeis)
51 Gregg Rothermel (U Nebraska, Lincoln)
51 Stefano Soatto (UCLA)
51 Dawn Song (Berkeley), MacArthur Fellow
51 Robert Stevens (U Manchester)
51 Roberto Tamassia (Brown U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
51 Joachim Weickert (Saarland University), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
51 Gerhard Woeginger (TU Eindhoven)
50 Vineet Bafna (UCSD)
50 Ben Bederson (U Maryland)
50 Steve Benford (U Nottingham)
50 Philip A. Bernstein (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
50 Brian Bershad (U Washington)
50 Aaron Bobick (Georgia Tech)
50 Boualem Benatallah (U New South Wales)
50 Guohong Cao (Penn State), IEEE Fellow
50 Lionel Briand (Carleton U)
50 Surajit Chaudhuri (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
50 Schahram Dustdar (TU Vienna), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
50 Garth Gibson (CMU), ACM Fellow
50 W. Eric L. Grimson (MIT), ACM Fellow
50 Jessica Hodgins (CMU)
50 Michal Irani (Weizmann)
50 Van Jacobson (PARC), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
50 Raj Jain (Washington U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
50 Christian S. Jensen (Aarhus U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
50 Jeff Kephart (IBM Research), IEEE Fellow
50 Angelos Keromytis (Columbia)
50 Edward Knightly (Rice U), IEEE Fellow
50 Hugo Krawczyk (IBM), IACR Fellow
50 Yann LeCun (NYU)
50 David Maier (Portland State U), ACM Fellow
50 Yishay Mansour (Tel Aviv U), ACM Fellow
50 Dimitris Metaxas (Rutgers)
50 Joseph S. B. Mitchell (SUNY Stony Brook), ACM Fellow
50 Trevor Mudge (U Michigan), IEEE Fellow, ACM-IEEE CS Eckert-Mauchly Award
50 S. Muthukrishnan (Rutgers), ACM Fellow
50 Frank Pfenning (CMU)
50 Benjamin Pierce (U Penn), ACM Fellow
50 Riccardo Poli (U Essex)
50 Joel Saltz (Emory University), American Medical Informatics Association Fellow
50 Majid Sarrafzadeh (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
50 Kevin Skadron (U Virginia), IEEE Fellow
50 Sargur Srihari (SUNY Buffalo), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
50 Alan Smeaton (Dublin City U), Member of the Royal Irish Academy
50 Douglas Stinson (U Waterloo)
50 Eva Tardos (Cornell), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IEEE Technical Achievement Award, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
50 Pascal Van Hentenryck (ANU and NICTA)
50 Michael Waidner (TU Darmstadt)
50 Darrell Whitley (Colorado State University)
50 Steve Whittaker (UC Santa Cruz), ACM Fellow
50 Zhengyou Zhang (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
50 Yuanyuan Zhou (UCSD), ACM Fellow
49 Andrew Barto (U Mass, Amherst), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
49 Bir Bhanu (UC Riverside), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow, AIMBE Fellow
49 Craig Boutilier (U Toronto), ACM Fellow
49 Andrew A. Chien (U. Chicago), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
49 Kenneth Church (IBM)
49 Philip R Cohen (Adapx Inc), AAAI Fellow,
49 David J. DeWitt (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
49 Paul Dourish (UC Irvine)
49 David Eppstein (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
49 Matthias Felleisen (Northeastern U), ACM Fellow
49 Steven Feiner (Columbia)
49 Carlos Guestrin (U Washington)
49 Leonidas J. Guibas (Stanford), ACM Fellow
49 Tian He (U Minnesota)
49 Holger Hoos (U British Columbia)
49 Hugues Hoppe (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
49 Tomasz Imielinski (Rutgers)
49 Ron Kimmel (Technion)
49 Hans-Peter Kriegel (Ludwig-Maximilians U, Munich), ACM Fellow
49 Benjamin Kuipers (U Michigan)
49 Hector Levesque (U Toronto), FRSC
49 Michael Luby (ICSI)
49 Kurt Mehlhorn (Max Planck), ACM Fellow
49 Robert Morris (MIT), ACM Fellow
49 Moni Naor (Weizmann), IACR Fellow
49 Jeffrey F. Naughton (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
49 Norman Paton (U Manchester)
49 Bart Preneel (KU Leuven)
49 Kannan Ramchandran (Berkeley)
49 Andre Schiper (EPFL)
49 Timos Sellis (RMIT, Australia)
49 Bart Selman (Cornell), ACM Fellow
49 Daniel Siewiorek (CMU), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
49 John Stasko (Georgia Tech)
49 Michael Stonebraker (MIT), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
49 V. S. Subrahmanian (U Maryland)
49 Richard S. Sutton (U Alberta)
49 Gerhard Weikum (Max Planck), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
49 David Wetherall (U Washington), ACM Fellow
49 David A. Wood (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
49 Ming-Hsuan Yang (UC Merced)
49 Justin Zobel (U Melbourne)
48 James Allan (U Mass, Amherst)
48 Franz Baader (TU Dresden), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
48 Dana Ballard (UT Austin)
48 Randal Bryant (CMU), ACM Fellow
48 Peter Buneman (U Edinburgh), ACM Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Society
48 Vince Calhoun (U New Mexico)
48 Michael J. Carey (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
48 Umeshwar Dayal (HP Labs), ACM Fellow
48 Pascal Fua (EPFL)
48 Pradeep K. Khosla (CMU), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
48 Joshua Knowles (U Manchester)
48 Simon S. Lam (UT Austin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
48 James Landay (U Washington)
48 Jerome Lang (CRNS)
48 Deborah L. McGuinness (RPI)
48 Samuel Madden (MIT)
48 Kathleen McKeown (Columbia), ACM Fellow
48 Kathryn McKinley (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
48 Gonzalo Navarro (U Chile)
48 Stefano Nolfi (National Research Council, Rome)
48 David Parnas (U Limerick), ACM Fellow
48 Jean-Jacques Quisquater (U Catholique de Louvain), IACR Fellow
48 Ulrike Sattler (U Manchester)
48 Mahadev Satyanarayanan (CMU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
48 Bernt Schiele (Max Planck)
48 Steven Seitz (U Washington)
48 Yoram Singer (Google)
48 Satinder Singh (U Michigan)
48 Richard Snodgrass (U Arizona), ACM Fellow
48 Peter Steenkiste (CMU)
48 Peter Stone (UT Austin)
48 Andrew Tomkins (Google)
48 Philip Torr (Oxford Brookes U)
48 Michael N. Vrahatis (U Patras)
48 Ben Y. Zhao (UC Santa Barbara)
47 Alex Aiken (Stanford), ACM Fellow
47 Wolfgang Banzhaf (Memorial U Newfoundland)
47 Elizabeth Belding (UC Santa Barbara)
47 Mark Billinghurst (U Canterbury, New Zealand)
47 Horst Bischof (Graz U of Technology)
47 Gaetano Borriello, (U Washington), ACM Fellow
47 Robert K. Brayton (Berkeley)
47 Justine Cassell (CMU)
47 Rina Dechter (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
47 Inderjit S. Dhillon (UT Austin), ACM Fellow
47 Andrew Gordon (Microsoft)
47 Dirk Grunwald (U Colorado)
47 Carl Gutwin (U Saskatchewan)
47 Greg Hager (Johns Hopkins U)
47 Mary Jean Harrold (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow
47 Matthew Hennessy (U Sussex)
47 Maurice Herlihy (Brown U), ACM Fellow
47 C.A.R. (Tony) Hoare (Microsoft), Turing Award, Fellow of the Royal Society, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
47 Mahmut Kandemir (Penn State)
47 Leonard Kleinrock (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
47 Jim Kurose (U Mass, Amherst), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
47 Richard Lipton (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
47 Scott Mahlke (U Michigan)
47 Nasir Memon (Polytechnic Institute of NYU), IEEE Fellow
47 Jeff Offutt (George Mason U)
47 Dimitris Papadias (Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech)
47 George Pappas (U Penn)
47 Yale Patt (UT Austin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
47 Yong Rui (Microsoft), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow
47 Shashi Shekhar (U Minnesota), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
47 Claudio Silva (NYU), IEEE Fellow
47 Mary Lou Soffa (U Virginia), ACM Fellow
47 P. N. Suganthan (Nanyang Tech U, Singapore)
47 Toby Walsh (NICTA and UNSW)
46 Henri Bal (Vrije U, Amsterdam)
46 Thomas Ball (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
46 Krishnendu Chakrabarty (Duke U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
46 Nick Duffield (AT&T Labs)
46 Max J. Egenhofer (U Maine)
46 Dror Feitelson (Hebrew U)
46 Edward A. Fox (Virginia Tech)
46 Rosario Gennaro (City College of New York)
46 Steve Gribble (U Washington)
46 Nicholas J. Higham (U Manchester), Fellow of the Royal Society, SIAM Fellow
46 John Hopcroft (Cornell), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
46 Tom Hou (Virginia Tech), IEEE Fellow
46 Katsushi Ikeuchi (U Tokyo)
46 Yannis Ioannidis (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
46 Niraj K. Jha (Princeton), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
46 Eamonn Keogh (UC Riverside)
46 Joe Kilian (Rutgers)
46 Dexter Kozen (Cornell), ACM Fellow
46 Vladimir Lifschitz (UT Austin)
46 Patrick Lincoln (SRI)
46 Margaret Martonosi (Princeton), ACM Fellow
46 Kenneth McMillan (Microsoft)
46 Daniel Menasce (George Mason U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
46 Enrico Motta (The Open University, UK)
46 Zoran Obradovic (Temple U)
46 Shmuel Peleg (Hebrew U)
46 Jean Ponce (ENS)
46 Mooly Sagiv (Tel Aviv University)
46 Mary Shaw (CMU), ACM Fellow
46 Rudi Studer (Karlsruhe Inst Tech)
46 Madhu Sudan (MIT), ACM Fellow
46 Chew Lim Tan (National U Singapore)
46 Rene Vidal (Johns Hopkins U)
46 Emo Welzl (ETH Zurich), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Member of the German Academy of Sciences
46 Franco Zambonelli (U Modena e Reggio Emilia), IEEE Fellow
46 Matt Welsh (Google)
45 Andrei Broder (Yahoo! Research), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Samir Das (SUNY Stony Brook)
45 Michael Ernst (U Washington), ACM Fellow
45 Anja Feldmann (TU Berlin)
45 Amos Fiat (Tel Aviv U)
45 Patrick J. Flynn (U Notre Dame)
45 Bernd Hamann (UC Davis)
45 Russell Impagliazzo (UCSD)
45 M. Frans Kaashoek (MIT), ACM Fellow, ACM Infosys Foundation Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Carl Kesselman (USC/ISI)
45 Ross King (U Manchester)
45 Rich Korf (UCLA), AAAI Fellow
45 John Koza (Stanford)
45 Arvind Krishnamurthy (U Washington)
45 Rudolf Kruse (U Magdeburg), IEEE Fellow
45 Ed Lazowska, (U Washington), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Victor Lesser (U Mass, Amherst), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow
45 Ming Li (U Waterloo), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
45 Bing Liu (U Illinois at Chicago), IEEE Fellow
45 Heikki Mannila (U Helsinki)
45 Daniel Marcu (USC)
45 Nenad Medvidovic (USC)
45 Alberto O. Mendelzon (U Toronto)
45 Bertrand Meyer (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow, ACM Software System Award, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
45 Dusit Niyato (Nanyang Technological U)
45 John Ousterhout (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Yannis Papakonstantinou (UCSD)
45 Bijan Parsia (U Manchester)
45 Michel Raynal (IRISA)
45 Fred Schneider (Cornell), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Dana Scott (CMU), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
45 Carles Sierra (Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Spain)
45 Eero P. Simoncelli (NYU), IEEE Fellow
45 Mukesh Singhal (UC Merced)
45 Marc Snir (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
45 Richard Taylor (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
45 Murat Tekalp (Koc University, Turkey), IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
45 Mikkel Thorup (AT&T Labs and U Copenhagen), ACM Fellow, Member of the Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters
45 Athanasios Vasilakos (U Western Macedonia)
45 Jun Wang (The Chinese U of Hong Kong), IEEE Fellow
45 Jarke J. van Wijk (TU Eindhoven)
45 Niklaus Wirth (ETH Zurich), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
45 Mohammed Zaki (RPI)
45 Steven Zucker (Yale)
44 Victor Basili (U Maryland), ACM Fellow
44 Ernst Biersack (Eurecom, Sophia Antipolis, France)
44 Kenneth Birman (Cornell), ACM Fellow
44 Andrew Brass (U Manchester)
44 Carla Brodley (Tufts University), AAAI Fellow
44 Jan Camenisch (IBM Zurich), IEEE Technical Achievement Award
44 Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran (Ohio State), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow
44 Brian Curless (U Washington)
44 Marlon Dumas (U Tartu)
44 E. Allen Emerson (UT Austin), Turing Award
44 Eleazar Eskin (UCLA)
44 Christos Faloutsos (CMU), ACM Fellow
44 Babak Falsafi (EPFL)
44 Carlo Ghezzi (Politecnico di Milano), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
44 Oded Goldreich (Weizmann), IACR Fellow
44 Shafi Goldwasser (MIT and Weizmann), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
44 Ahmed Helmy (U Florida)
44 Manuel Hermenegildo (IMDEA and U Politecnica Madrid)
44 Thomas Hofmann (Google)
44 Markus Jakobsson (Paypal)
44 Jean-Marc Jezequel (U Rennes and INRIA)
44 Thorsten Joachims (Cornell), ACM Fellow
44 Lydia Kavraki (Rice U), ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the Institute of Medicine
44 Donald Kossmann (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow
44 Tao Li (Florida International U)
44 Gail Murphy (U British Columbia)
44 Tobias Nipkow (TU Munich)
44 Paul C. van Oorschot (Carleton U)
44 M. Tamer Özsu (U Waterloo), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
44 Franco Preparata (Brown U), ACM Fellow
44 Robbert van Renesse (Cornell), ACM Fellow
44 Rob Rutenbar (UIUC)
44 Robert E. Schapire (Princeton)
44 Victor Shoup (NYU)
44 Mateo Valero (Technical U Catalonia and Barcelona Supercomputing Center), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
44 Sabrina De Capitani di Vimercati (U degli Studi di Milano)
44 Jason Weston (Google)
44 Adam Wolisz (TU Berlin)
44 Ellen Zegura (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow
43 Andrew Appel (Princeton), ACM Fellow
43 Don Batory (UT Austin)
43 Yoshua Bengio (U Montreal)
43 Eli Biham (Technion), IACR Fellow
43 Raouf Boutaba (U Waterloo), IEEE Fellow, EIC Fellow
43 Soumen Chakrabarti (IIT Bombay)
43 Ming-Syan Chen (Academia Sinica, Taiwan), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
43 Stephen Cook (U Toronto), Turing Award
43 Dorin Comaniciu (Siemens), IEEE Fellow
43 Susan Eggers (U Washington), ACM Fellow
43 Uriel Feige (Weizmann)
43 Daniela Florescu (Oracle)
43 Robert France (Colorado State U)
43 Zvi Galil (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
43 Dennis Gannon (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
43 Michael T. Goodrich (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
43 Joseph Goguen (UCSD)
43 Isabelle Guyon (ClopiNet/ChaLearn)
43 Farnam Jahanian (U Michigan), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
43 Simon Peyton Jones (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
43 Won Kim (Sung Kyun Kwan University), ACM Fellow
43 Butler Lampson (Microsoft), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
43 Baochun Li (U Toronto)
43 Barbara Liskov (MIT), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
43 Michael Luck (King's College London)
43 Satoshi Matsuoka (Tokyo Institute of Technology), ACM Fellow
43 Sharad Mehrotra (UC Irvine)
43 Risto Miikkulainen (UT Austin)
43 Robin Milner (U Cambridge), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
43 Nassir Navab (TU Munich and Johns Hopkins U)
43 Martha Stone Palmer (Colorado U)
43 Sharath Pankanti (IBM Watson)
43 Birgit Pfitzmann (IBM Zurich)
43 Dragomir Radev (U Michigan)
43 Krithi Ramamritham (IIT Bombay), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
43 Rajesh Rao (U Washington)
43 Alan Rector (U Manchester)
43 Maarten de Rijke (U Amsterdam)
43 Angela Sasse (U College London)
43 Shlomo Shamai (Technion)
43 Amnon Shashua (Hebrew U)
43 Bernhard Steffen (TU Dortmund)
43 Sung Wing Kin (National U Singapore)
43 Marilyn Walker (UC Santa Cruz)
43 Avi Wigderson (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton)
43 Pierre Wolper (U Liege)
43 Limsoon Wong (National U Singapore)
42 Karl Aberer (EPFL)
42 Gul Agha (UIUC)
42 Michael Arbib (USC)
42 Barry Boehm (USC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
42 John A. Carroll (U Sussex)
42 Ivan Damgård (Aarhus U), IACR Fellow
42 Adnan Darwiche (UCLA), AAAI Fellow
42 Luc Devroye (McGill U)
42 Josep Domingo-Ferrer (U Rovira i Virgili, Catalonia), IEEE Fellow
42 Bruce R. Donald (Duke U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
42 Keith Edwards (Georgia Tech)
42 Charles Elkan (UCSD)
42 Wulfram Gerstner (EPFL)
42 Gaston H. Gonnet (ETH Zurich)
42 Jan Friso Groote (TU Eindhoven)
42 Robert Harper (CMU), ACM Fellow
42 Wynne Hsu (National U Singapore)
42 Sitharama S. Iyengar (Florida International U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Member of the European Academy of Sciences
42 Liviu Iftode (Rutgers)
42 Josef Kittler (Surrey U)
42 Anna Karlin (U Washington)
42 Srinivasan Keshav (U Waterloo)
42 Teuvo Kohonen (Academy of Finland), IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
42 Richard E. Ladner (U Washington)
42 Arjen Lenstra (EPFL), IACR Fellow
42 Miron Livny (U Wisconsin)
42 Marco Ajmone Marsan (Politecnico di Torino), IEEE Fellow
42 Jose Meseguer (UIUC)
42 Prasant Mohapatra (UC Davis), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
42 Fionn Murtagh (U London)
42 Andrew Y. Ng (Stanford)
42 Natasha Noy (Stanford)
42 Erkki Oja (Helsinki U of Technology)
42 Beng Chin Ooi (National U Singapore), ACM Fellow
42 Jignesh Patel (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
42 David Poole (U British Columbia)
42 Massimiliano Pontil (U College London)
42 William Sanders (UIUC)
42 Vivek Sarkar (Rice U), ACM Fellow
42 Micha Sharir (Tel Aviv U), ACM Fellow
42 Thomas Schiex (INRIA, Toulouse)
42 Eugene Spafford (Purdue U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
42 Dean Tullsen (UCSD), ACM Fellow
42 Wei Wang (UCLA)
42 Min Wu (U Maryland), IEEE Fellow
42 Alexander Wolf (Imperial College, London), ACM Fellow
42 Willy Zwaenepoel (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
41 Emile Aarts (TU Eindhoven)
41 Mikhail Atallah (Purdue U), ACM Fellow
41 Manuel Blum (CMU), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
41 Alan Borning (U Washington)
41 Terrance E. Boult (U Colorado at Colorado Springs)
41 Srdjan Capkun (ETH Zurich)
41 Ed G. Coffman (Columbia), ACM Fellow
41 Joelle Coutaz (U Joseph Fourier, Grenoble)
41 Stephane Ducasse (INRIA Lille)
41 Cynthia Dwork (Microsoft), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
41 Boi Faltings (EPFL)
41 Lance Fortnow (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow
41 Harold Gabow (U Colorado), ACM Fellow
41 Patrice Godefroid (Microsoft)
41 Luis Gravano (Columbia)
41 Jonathan Hull (Ricoh), IAPR Fellow
41 Mary Jane Irwin (Penn State), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
41 Michael Kearns (U Penn), ACM Fellow
41 David Lowe (U British Columbia)
41 Kwan-Liu Ma (UC Davis)
41 Jan Mendling (WU Vienna)
41 Dale Miller (INRIA)
41 Marvin Minsky (MIT), Turing Award
41 Michael Mozer (U Colorado)
41 Ian Munro (U Waterloo)
41 Richard Muntz (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
41 Sharon Oviatt (Incaa Designs)
41 Jens Palsberg (UCLA)
41 Stefano Paraboschi (U Bergamo)
41 Lawrence C. Paulson (U Cambridge), ACM Fellow
41 Gian Pietro Picco (U Trento)
41 Viktor Prasanna (USC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
41 Arun Somani (Iowa State)
41 Aravind Srinivasan (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
41 Jean-Philippe Thiran (EPFL)
41 Sam Toueg (U Toronto)
41 Uzi Vishkin (U Maryland), ACM Fellow
41 Haixun Wang (Google)
41 Ke Wang (Simon Fraser U)
41 Manfred K. Warmuth (UC Santa Cruz)
41 William Weihl (Facebook)
41 Andrew Yao (Tsinghua U), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, IACR Fellow
41 Eric Yu (U Toronto)
41 Feng Zhao (Microsoft), IEEE Fellow
40 Leonard Adleman (USC), Turing Award
40 Andrea Arpaci-Dusseau (U Wisconsin)
40 Amotz Bar-Noy (Brooklyn College)
40 Craig Chambers (Google)
40 Sunghyun Choi (Seoul National U)
40 Edmund M. Clarke (CMU), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Jan Chomicki (SUNY Buffalo)
40 David Corne (Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh)
40 Edsger Dijkstra (UT Austin), Turing Award
40 Herbert Edelsbrunner (Duke U), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
40 Thomas Ertl (U Stuttgart)
40 Nick Feamster (Georgia Tech)
40 Cormac Flanagan (UCSC)
40 Edward Feigenbaum (Stanford), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Yoav Freund (UCSD), AAAI Fellow
40 Venu Govindaraju (U Buffalo), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
40 Manish Gupta (Goldman Sachs), ACM Fellow
40 Hannes Hartenstein (Karlsruhe Inst Tech)
40 Pavol Hell (Simon Fraser U)
40 Neil D. Jones (DIKU, U Copenhagen), ACM Fellow
40 Ari Juels (RSA)
40 Philipp Koehn (U Edinburgh and Johns Hopkins U)
40 Pedro Larranaga (Technical U Madrid)
40 Seong-Whan Lee (Korea University), IEEE Fellow
40 Brian Neil Levine (U Mass, Amherst)
40 Nancy Lynch (MIT), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Rupak Majumdar (Max Planck and UCLA)
40 Ralph Martin (Cardiff U), Fellow of the British Computer Society
40 Maja Mataric (USC)
40 John Mitchell (Stanford), ACM Fellow
40 David McAllester (Toyota Tech Inst), AAAI Fellow
40 John McCarthy (Stanford), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Luc Moreau (U Southampton)
40 Oscar Nierstrasz (U Bern)
40 David Notkin (U Washington), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
40 John Owens (UC Davis)
40 Mark Pauly (EPFL)
40 Andrzej Pelc (U Quebec en Outaouais)
40 David Pennock (Microsoft)
40 Charles E. Perkins (Nokia-Siemens Networks)
40 Michael O. Rabin (Harvard), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the French Academy of Sciences, Member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
40 Sudhakar Reddy (U Iowa), IEEE Fellow
40 Raymond Reiter (U Toronto), ACM Fellow
40 Pablo Rodriguez Rodriguez (Telefonica Research)
40 Yehoshua Sagiv (Hebrew U)
40 Sunita Sarawagi (IIT Bombay)
40 Mihaela van der Schaar (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
40 Assaf Schuster (Technion)
40 Cyrus Shahabi (USC), IEEE Fellow
40 Linda Shapiro (U Washington)
40 Anand Sivasubramaniam (Penn State)
40 Gurindar S. Sohi (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
40 Jacques Stern (ENS, Paris), IACR Fellow
40 S. Sudarshan (IIT Bombay), ACM Fellow
40 Paul Syverson (U.S. Naval Research Laboratory), ACM Fellow
40 Patrick Thiran (EPFL)
40 John K. Tsotsos (York U, Canada), FRSC
40 Ruediger Urbanke (EPFL)
40 Frits Vaandrager (Radboud U Nijmegen)
40 Leslie Valiant (Harvard), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
40 Victor Vianu (UCSD), ACM Fellow
40 James H. Wilkinson (National Physical Laboratory, England), Turing Award
40 Xing Xie (Microsoft)
40 Shuicheng Yan (National U Singapore)
144 Anil K. Jain (Michigan State U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
131 Jiawei Han (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
126 Scott Shenker (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
124 David Haussler (UC Santa Cruz), ISCB Fellow
120 Terrence Sejnowski (UCSD), IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the Institute of Medicine, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
118 Hector Garcia-Molina (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
118 Takeo Kanade (CMU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
115 Philip S. Yu (UIC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
113 Don Towsley (U Mass, Amherst), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
112 Wil van der Aalst (TU Eindhoven), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Member of the Royal Holland Society of Sciences and Humanities
112 Steven Salzberg (Johns Hopkins U), AAAS Fellow, ISCB Fellow
111 Tomaso Poggio (MIT)
110 Deborah Estrin (Cornell NYC Tech), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
110 Sebastian Thrun (Stanford), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
109 Ian Foster (Argonne National Laboratory & U Chicago), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow, BCS Fellow
108 Stephen Grossberg (Boston University)
108 Michael I. Jordan (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, SIAM Fellow
107 David Culler (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
107 Didier Dubois (CNRS Toulouse)
107 Henri Prade (CNRS Toulouse)
106 Andrew Zisserman (University of Oxford), Fellow of the Royal Society
105 Geoffrey E. Hinton (U Toronto), Fellow of the Royal Society, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, Fellow of the Royal Society, FRSC, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
105 HongJiang Zhang (KingSoft, China), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, ACM SIGMM Technical Achievement Award, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
104 Christos H. Papadimitriou (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
104 Alex Pentland (MIT), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
103 Nick Jennings (U Southampton), IEEE Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
102 Bernhard Schölkopf (Max Planck)
101 Stanley Osher (UCLA), Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow
100 Mario Gerla (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
100 Georgios Giannakis (U Minnesota), IEEE Fellow
100 John A. Stankovic (U Virginia), ACM Fellow
97 Jack Dongarra (U Tennessee), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, SIAM Fellow, AAAS Fellow
95 Shree Nayar (Columbia), Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
94 Martin Vetterli (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
92 Richard Karp (Berkeley), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
92 Alex Szalay (Johns Hopkins U)
92 Lotfi Zadeh (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
90 Vipin Kumar (U Minnesota), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
89 Jitendra Malik (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
89 Jeffrey D. Ullman (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
88 Luc Van Gool (ETH Zurich)
87 Hari Balakrishnan (MIT), ACM Fellow
86 Rajkumar Buyya (University of Melbourne, Australia), IEEE Medal for Excellence in Scalable Computing
86 Thomas A. Henzinger (IST Austria), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
86 Randy H. Katz (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
86 Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
86 Moshe Y. Vardi (Rice U), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
85 Ian F. Akyildiz (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
84 Olivier Faugeras (INRIA), Member of the French Academy of Sciences
84 David E. Goldberg (UIUC)
84 Francisco Herrera (U Granada, Spain)
84 Shankar Sastry (Berkeley)
83 Kalyanmoy Deb (Michigan State U), IEEE Fellow, ASME Fellow
83 Sushil Jajodia (George Mason U), IEEE Fellow
82 Marco Dorigo (U Libre de Bruxelles), IEEE Fellow, ECCAI Fellow, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
82 Mark Horowitz (Stanford), ACM Fellow
82 Robert Tarjan (Princeton), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
81 Rakesh Agrawal (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
81 Noga Alon (Tel Aviv U)
81 Amit Sheth (Wright State U), IEEE Fellow
81 Ben Shneiderman (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
80 Martin Abadi (Google and UC Santa Cruz ), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow
80 Mihir Bellare (UCSD), ACM Fellow, IACR Fellow
80 Alon Halevy [Alon Levy] (Google), ACM Fellow
80 Daphne Koller (Stanford), MacArthur Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, ACM Infosys Foundation Award
80 Mani B. Srivastava (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
80 Katia Sycara (CMU), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow
80 Jennifer Widom (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
79 Rama Chellappa (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow, OSA Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 Tim Finin (UMBC), AAAI Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 Dinesh Manocha (UNC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
78 Klaus-Robert Müller (TU Berlin)
78 Hermann Ney (RWTH Aachen), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 David A. Patterson (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
78 Mihalis Yannakakis (Columbia), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
77 Jose Joaquin Garcia-Luna-Aceves (UC Santa Cruz and PARC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Corresponding Member of the Mexican Academy Sciences, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
77 Thomas S. Huang (UIUC), IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
77 Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia), ACM Fellow
77 Lixia Zhang (UCLA), ACM Fellow
76 Gene H. Golub (Stanford)
76 Richard Szeliski (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
75 Ken Kennedy (Rice U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
75 Rajeev Motwani (Stanford), ACM Fellow
75 Mubarak Shah (U Central Florida), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow
75 Witold Pedrycz (U Alberta), IEEE Fellow
74 W. Bruce Croft (U Mass, Amherst), ACM Fellow
74 Fred Glover (U Colorado)
74 Donald E. Knuth (Stanford), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
74 Hans-Peter Seidel (Max Planck)
73 Andrew Blake (Microsoft), Fellow of the Royal Society
73 John M. Carroll (Penn State U)
73 Ian Horrocks (Oxford U), Fellow of the Royal Society
73 Robert Kraut (CMU), ACM Fellow
73 Giovanni De Micheli (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
73 Biswanath Mukherjee (UC Davis)
73 Klara Nahrstedt (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
73 Burkhard Rost (TU Munich)
72 Rajeev Alur (U Penn), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
72 Nicholas Ayache (INRIA)
72 Alexander J. Smola (CMU)
71 Monica S. Lam (Stanford), ACM Fellow
71 Azriel Rosenfeld (U Maryland), ACM Fellow
71 Barry Smith (SUNY Buffalo)
71 Demetri Terzopoulos (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the European Academy of Sciences, FRSC
71 Jie Wu (Temple U), IEEE Fellow
71 Ronald Yager (Iona College), IEEE Fellow
70 Richard Baraniuk (Rice U), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
70 Hsinchun Chen (U Arizona), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
70 Ronald Fagin (IBM Almaden), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, ACM SIGMOD Edgar F. Codd Innovations Award, IEEE Technical Achievement Award, IEEE W. Wallace McDowell Award
70 Jim Gray (Microsoft), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
70 David Karger (MIT), ACM Fellow
70 Judea Pearl (UCLA), Turing Award, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
70 H. Vincent Poor (Princeton)
70 Prabhakar Raghavan (Yahoo! Research), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
70 Adi Shamir (Weizmann), Turing Award, IACR Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
70 Kishor S. Trivedi (Duke U), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
70 Moti Yung (Google), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IACR Fellow
70 Terry Winograd (Stanford)
69 Tarek Abdelzaher (UIUC)
69 Thomas Anderson (U Washington), ACM Fellow
69 James Bezdek (U West Florida), IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
69 H. V. Jagadish (U Michigan), ACM Fellow
69 Jon Kleinberg (Cornell), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, MacArthur Fellow, ACM Infosys Foundation Award, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, ACM-AAAI Allen Newell Award
69 Edward A. Lee (Berkeley)
69 Pavel Pevzner (UCSD), ACM Fellow, ISCB Fellow
68 Serge Abiteboul (INRIA), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
68 Pascal Fua (EPFL), IEEE Fellow
68 Markus Gross (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow, Member of the German Academy of Sciences
68 Eric Horvitz (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
68 Olvi L. Mangasarian (U Wisconsin)
68 Vern Paxson (ICSI), ACM Fellow
68 Ronald L. Rivest (MIT), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
68 Kang G. Shin (U Michigan), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
68 Eduardo Sontag (Rutgers), IEEE Fellow
68 Nitin Vaidya (UIUC)
68 John von Neumann (Princeton)
67 Pierre Baldi (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow, AAAI Fellow, IEEE Fellow, ISCB Fellow
67 Anantha Chandrakasan (MIT)
67 Shih-Fu Chang (Columbia), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award
67 William Freeman (MIT), IEEE Fellow
67 Ramesh Govindan (USC), ACM Fellow
67 Andrew B. Kahng (UCSD), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
67 Maurizio Lenzerini (Sapienza U di Roma), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
67 Thomas W. Reps (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
67 Chris Taylor (U Manchester)
67 Jeffrey Vitter (U Kansas), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
67 Alex Waibel (CMU and U Karlsruhe)
66 Ricardo Baeza-Yates (Yahoo Labs), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
66 Elisa Bertino (Purdue U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
66 Dan Boneh (Stanford), ACM Infosys Foundation Award, IACR Fellow
66 William Dally (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Fellow of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
66 Sajal K. Das (Missouri University of Science and Tech), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
66 Martial Hebert (CMU)
66 John Mylopoulos (U Toronto), FRSC
66 Allen Newell (CMU), Turing Award, IEEE Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
66 Michael Wooldridge (U Liverpool), AAAI Fellow
65 Wolfram Burgard (U Freiburg)
65 Anoop Gupta (Microsoft)
65 Jean-Pierre Hubaux (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
65 Anupam Joshi (U Maryland, Baltimore County)
65 Nick McKeown (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
65 Sankar K. Pal (Indian Statistical Institute), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
65 Steffen Staab (U Koblenz-Landau)
65 Ion Stoica (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
65 Haim J. Wolfson (Tel Aviv U)
64 Luca Benini (U Bologna)
64 Andrew Campbell (Dartmouth)
64 Larry Davis (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
64 Susan Dumais (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
64 Joseph Y. Halpern (Cornell), ACM Fellow
64 George Karypis (U Minnesota)
64 James Hendler (RPI), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow, BCS Fellow
64 Dimitris Metaxas (Rutgers), Fellow of American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineers
64 Adrian Perrig (ETH Zurich)
64 Raghu Ramakrishnan (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
64 Cordelia Schmid (INRIA)
64 Ivan Stojmenovic (U Ottawa), IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
64 George Varghese (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Kobayashi Award, ACM SIGCOMM Lifetime Award
64 Zhi-Hua Zhou (Nanjing U), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
63 Hojjat Adeli (Ohio State U), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
63 Christophe Diot (Thomson Technology Paris Lab), ACM Fellow
63 Nir Friedman (Hebrew U of Jerusalem)
63 David S. Johnson (AT&T Labs), ACM Fellow, SIAM Fellow
63 Sara Kiesler (CMU), ACM Fellow
63 Ming C. Lin (UNC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
63 Andrew McCallum (U Mass, Amherst), AAAI Fellow
63 Theodore S. Rappaport (NYU)
63 Michael Reiter (UNC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
63 Daniel Thalmann (EPFL)
62 Jason Cong (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
62 Tim Cootes (U Manchester)
62 Erol Gelenbe (Imperial College, London), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, SIGMETRICS Life-Time Achievement Award, Member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences, Member of the Hungarian Academy of Scences, Member of the French National Academy of Engineering, Chevalier de la Legion d'Honneur, Member of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Member of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Letters and Arts of Belgium
62 C. Lee Giles (Penn State), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
62 William Gropp (UIUC) ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, SIAM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
62 Gabor Herman (City University of New York), IEEE Fellow
62 Janusz Kacprzyk (Polish Academy of Sciences), IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
62 C.-C. Jay Kuo (USC), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, SPIE Fellow
62 Larry Peterson (Princeton), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
62 Tieniu Tan (Chinese Academy of Sciences), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
62 Douglas C. Schmidt (Vanderbilt University)
62 Lothar Thiele (ETH Zurich)
62 Michael Unser (EPFL)
62 Yorick Wilks (IHMC, Florida)
61 Norman I. Badler (U Penn)
61 Jon Crowcroft (U Cambridge), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Society
61 Srinivas Devadas (MIT), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
61 Oren Etzioni (U Washington)
61 Dieter Fox (U Washington)
61 Michael Franklin (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
61 Saul Greenberg (University of Calgary), Member of the ACM CHI Academy
61 Pat Hanrahan (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
61 Henry Kautz (Rochester), ACM Fellow
61 Kai Li (Princeton), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
61 Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann (U Geneva)
61 Chunming Qiao (SUNY Buffalo), IEEE Fellow
61 Kaushik Roy (Purdue U)
61 Russell H. Taylor (Johns Hopkins U)
61 Roger Wattenhofer (ETH Zurich)
61 Alan Yuille (UCLA)
60 Ross Anderson (U Cambridge), Fellow of the Royal Society
60 David Dill (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
60 Wen Gao (Peking U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
60 Wen-Mei W. Hwu (UIUC), ACM Fellow
60 Frank Leymann (U Stuttgart)
60 K. J. Ray Liu (U Maryland), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
60 Zohar Manna (Stanford), ACM Fellow
60 Lionel Ni (Hong Kong U of Science and Tech)
60 Stefan Savage (UCSD), ACM Fellow
60 Dan Suciu (U Washington), ACM Fellow
60 Yiyu Yao (U Regina)
59 Mohamed-Slim Alouini (KAUST)
59 Daniel Bobrow (Xerox), ACM Fellow
59 Carole Goble (U Manchester)
59 Henry Levy (U Washington), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
59 Huan Liu (Arizona State U)
59 Silvio Micali (MIT), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
59 David Tse (Berkeley)
59 Jonathan Turner (Washington U, St Louis), ACM Fellow
59 Manuela Veloso (CMU)
59 Philip Wadler (U Edinburgh), ACM Fellow
59 Daniel S. Weld (U Washington), ACM Fellow
58 Mostafa H. Ammar (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
58 Eric Brewer (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
58 Luca Cardelli (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Fellow of the Royal Society
58 Peter Druschel (Max Planck), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
58 Ronald Fedkiw (Stanford), Academy Award from The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
58 Mark D. Hill (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
58 Ramesh Jain (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow
58 David B. Johnson (Rice U)
58 Arie Kaufman (SUNY Stony Brook), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
58 Wenke Lee (Georgia Tech)
58 Pattie Maes (MIT)
58 Noam Nisan (Hebrew U)
58 John Reif (Duke U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
58 Jennifer Rexford (Princeton), ACM Fellow
58 Amin Vahdat (UCSD), ACM Fellow
58 David Wagner (Berkeley)
57 Alfred V. Aho (Columbia U), ACM Fellow
57 Gustavo Alonso (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
57 Michael J. Black (Brown U)
57 Avrim Blum (CMU), ACM Fellow
57 Jean-Yves Le Boudec (EPFL)
57 James Demmel (Berkeley), ACM Fellow, SIAM Fellow, Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award
57 Stuart K. Card (Xerox)
57 David Fogel (Natural Selection), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award
57 David K. Gifford (MIT)
57 Mark Handley (U College London)
57 Robert Haralick (City U of New York)
57 David Harel (Weizmann), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
57 Somesh Jha (U Wisconsin)
57 Leslie Lamport (Microsoft), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
57 Steve Lawrence (Google)
57 Tom Leighton (MIT), Member of the National Academy of Engineering, SIAM Fellow
57 Tom Mitchell (CMU)
57 Jason H. Moore (Dartmouth), AAAS Fellow, Kavli Fellow
57 Wolfgang Nejdl (L3S Research Center, Hannover)
57 Rafail Ostrovsky (UCLA), IACR Fellow
57 Massoud Pedram (USC)
57 David Salesin (Adobe Systems), ACM Fellow
57 Tuomas Sandholm (CMU), ACM Fellow
57 Padhraic Smyth (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
57 Andrew S. Tanenbaum (Vrije U, The Netherlands), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
57 Walter Willinger (Bell Labs), ACM Fellow, SIAM Fellow
57 Xin Yao (U Birmingham), IEEE Fellow
57 Michele Zorzi (U Padova), IEEE Fellow
56 Gregory D. Abowd (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, ACM SIGCHI Academy
56 Alan Burns (U York)
56 Stefano Ceri (Politecnico di Milano), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
56 Bernard Chazelle (Princeton), ACM Fellow
56 Ingemar J. Cox (U College London), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Rachid Deriche (INRIA)
56 Dieter Fensel (Innsbruck U)
56 David Garlan (CMU), ACM Fellow
56 Dimitrios Gunopulos (U Athens)
56 Kim G. Larsen (Aalborg U)
56 Songwu Lu (UCLA)
56 Raymond Mooney (UT Austin), ACM Fellow
56 Brad Myers (CMU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Pietro Perona (Cal Tech)
56 Miodrag Potkonjak (UCLA)
56 Rajeev Rastogi (Amazon), ACM Fellow
56 Daniela Rus (MIT), ACM Fellow, MacArthur Fellow
56 Sartaj Sahni (U Florida), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Hanan Samet (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
56 Ravi Sandhu (UT San Antonio), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
56 Dennis Shasha (NYU), ACM Fellow
56 Prashant Shenoy (U Mass, Amherst)
56 Ian Witten (U Waikato), ACM Fellow
56 Yang Xiao (U Alabama)
55 Michael Cohen (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
55 Daniel Cohen-Or (Tel Aviv U)
55 Stefan Decker (National U Ireland)
55 Pedro Domingos (U Washington)
55 Philippe Flajolet (INRIA), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
55 Tao Jiang (UC Riverside), ACM Fellow, AAAS Fellow
55 David Kotz (Dartmouth)
55 Jeff Kramer (Imperial College, London), ACM Fellow
55 Ravi Kumar (Google)
55 H. T. Kung (Harvard), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
55 Sharad Malik (Princeton), ACM Fellow
55 B. S. Manjunath (UC Santa Barbara), IEEE Fellow
55 Alex Nicolau (UC Irvine), IEEE Fellow
55 David Padua (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
55 David Peleg (Weizmann)
55 Philip Rogaway (UC Davis), IACR Fellow
55 Gerard Salton (Cornell), ACM Fellow
55 Joseph Sifakis (EPFL), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
55 Nigel Shadbolt (U Southampton)
55 Salvatore Stolfo (Columbia)
55 Milind Tambe (USC), ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow
55 Vladimir Vapnik (Royal Holloway, U London) Member of the National Academy of Engineering, IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
55 Geoffrey Voelker (UCSD)
54 Chandrajit Bajaj (UT Austin), ACM Fellow
54 David Blaauw (U Michigan)
54 Ran Canetti (Tel Aviv U)
54 John Canny (Berkeley)
54 Imrich Chlamtac (U Trento)
54 Trevor Darrell (Berkeley)
54 Ahmed Elmagarmid (Purdue U and Qatar Computing Research Inst), ACM Fellow
54 David Heckerman (Microsoft and UCLA), ACM Fellow
54 Kurt Keutzer (Berkeley), IEEE Fellow
54 Fernando C. N. Pereira (U Penn)
54 Amir Pnueli (Weizmann and New York University), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
54 Marc Pollefeys (ETH Zurich), IEEE Fellow
54 Mary Beth Rosson (Penn State U)
54 Abraham Silberschatz (Yale), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
54 Barry Smyth (U College Dublin)
54 Andreas Stolcke (Microsoft)
54 Gene Tsudik (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
53 Ajith Abraham (MIR Labs)
53 Pankaj K. Agarwal (Duke U), ACM Fellow
53 Divyakant Agrawal (UC Santa Barbara), ACM Fellow
53 Shun-ichi Amari (Riken)
53 David Cheriton (Stanford)
53 Mark Crovella (Boston University), ACM Fellow
53 Dipankar Dasgupta (U Memphis), IEEE Fellow
53 Sally Floyd (ICSI), ACM Fellow
53 Giuseppe De Giacomo (Sapienza U di Roma)
53 Georg Gottlob (University of Oxford), ACM Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Society, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
53 Frank van Harmelen (Vrije U, The Netherlands)
53 John Heidemann (USC/ISI)
53 Craig Knoblock (USC)
53 Laks V.S. Lakshmanan (U British Columbia)
53 James Larus (EPFL), ACM Fellow
53 Michael L. Littman (Rutgers)
53 Zbigniew Michalewicz (U Adelaide)
53 Michael Mitzenmacher (Harvard), ACM Fellow
53 Michael Pazzani (Rutgers)
53 Rosalind Picard (MIT)
53 Manfred Reichert (Ulm U)
53 Amit Sahai (UCLA)
53 John R. Smith (IBM Research)
53 Divesh Srivastava (AT&T Labs), ACM Fellow
53 Gaurav Sukhatme (USC)
53 Subhash Suri (UC Santa Barbara), ACM Fellow
53 Enrique Herrera Viedma (U Granada)
53 Michael P. Wellman (U Michigan), ACM Fellow
53 Gio Wiederhold (Stanford), ACM Fellow
52 James F. Allen (U Rochester)
52 Eitan Altman (INRIA Sophia-Antipolis), IEEE Fellow
52 Serge Belongie (Cornell Tech in NYC and UCSD)
52 Roberto Cipolla (U Cambridge)
52 Carlos A. C. Coello (CINVESTAV-IPN, Mexico), IEEE Fellow, IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award
52 William W. Cohen (CMU)
52 Erik Demaine (MIT)
52 Thomas Dietterich (Oregon State U), ACM Fellow
52 Danny Dolev (Hebrew U), ACM Fellow
52 Thomas Eiter (TU Vienna)
52 Johannes Gehrke (Cornell), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
52 Phillip Gibbons (Intel), ACM Fellow
52 Donald Greenberg (Cornell U)
52 Jonathan Grudin (Microsoft)
52 Rajesh Gupta (UCSD), IEEE Fellow
52 John Hennessy (Stanford), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
52 Charles E. Leiserson (MIT), ACM Fellow
52 Jure Leskovec (Stanford)
52 Marc Levoy (Stanford)
52 Theo Pavlidis (SUNY Stony Brook), IEEE Fellow
52 Peter Patel-Schneider (Nuance Communications)
52 Gordon Plotkin (U Edinburgh), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
52 Jan M. Rabaey (Berkeley)
52 Gunnar Ratsch (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)
52 John Riedl (U Minnesota), ACM Fellow
52 Keith Ross (Polytechnic Institute of NYU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
52 Dan Roth (UIUC), ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow, ACL Fellow
52 Pierangela Samarati (U Milano)
52 Alejandro Schaffer (National Institutes of Health)
52 Carlo Zaniolo (UCLA)
52 Qian Zhang (Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech), IEEE Fellow
51 Dharma P. Agrawal (U Cincinnati), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
51 Baruch Awerbuch (Johns Hopkins U)
51 Joachim Buhmann (ETH Zurich)
51 Kevin Bowyer (U Notre Dame), IEEE Fellow
51 Peter Brusilovsky (U Pittsburgh and CMU)
51 Brad Calder (Microsoft)
51 Diego Calvanese (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)
51 Fabio Casati (U Trento)
51 Peter Denning (Naval Postgraduate School), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, past ACM President
51 Stephanie Forrest (U New Mexico)
51 Zoubin Ghahramani (U Cambridge / CMU)
51 Ron Graham (UCSD), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Sciences
51 Rachid Guerraoui (EPFL), ACM Fellow
51 Rajiv Gupta (UC Riverside), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
51 Joseph M. Hellerstein (Berkeley), ACM Fellow
51 Piotr Indyk (MIT)
51 Hisao Ishibuchi (Osaka Prefecture University), IEEE Fellow)
51 Norman Jouppi (HP Labs), ACM Fellow
51 Kevin Knight (USC)
51 David Kriegman (UCSD)
51 Der-Tsai Lee (National Chung Hsing University), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of TWAS
51 Xiang-Yang Li (Illinois Institute of Tech)
51 Steven Low (Cal Tech)
51 Wei-Ying Ma (Microsoft)
51 Christopher Manning (Stanford), ACM Fellow
51 Ueli Maurer (ETH Zurich), IEEE Fellow, IACR Fellow, Member of the German Academy of Sciences
51 Thomas P. Moran (IBM), ACM Fellow
51 Vijaykrishnan Narayanan (Penn State), ACM Fellow
51 Badri Nath [B R Badrinath] (Rutgers)
51 Lionel M. Ni (Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech), IEEE Fellow
51 Venkata N. Padmanabhan (Microsoft Research), IEEE Fellow, Member of the Indian National Academy of Engineering
51 Jordan Pollack (Brandeis)
51 Gregg Rothermel (U Nebraska, Lincoln)
51 Stefano Soatto (UCLA)
51 Dawn Song (Berkeley), MacArthur Fellow
51 Robert Stevens (U Manchester)
51 Roberto Tamassia (Brown U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
51 Joachim Weickert (Saarland University), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
51 Gerhard Woeginger (TU Eindhoven)
50 Vineet Bafna (UCSD)
50 Ben Bederson (U Maryland)
50 Steve Benford (U Nottingham)
50 Philip A. Bernstein (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
50 Brian Bershad (U Washington)
50 Aaron Bobick (Georgia Tech)
50 Boualem Benatallah (U New South Wales)
50 Guohong Cao (Penn State), IEEE Fellow
50 Lionel Briand (Carleton U)
50 Surajit Chaudhuri (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
50 Schahram Dustdar (TU Vienna), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
50 Garth Gibson (CMU), ACM Fellow
50 W. Eric L. Grimson (MIT), ACM Fellow
50 Jessica Hodgins (CMU)
50 Michal Irani (Weizmann)
50 Van Jacobson (PARC), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
50 Raj Jain (Washington U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
50 Christian S. Jensen (Aarhus U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
50 Jeff Kephart (IBM Research), IEEE Fellow
50 Angelos Keromytis (Columbia)
50 Edward Knightly (Rice U), IEEE Fellow
50 Hugo Krawczyk (IBM), IACR Fellow
50 Yann LeCun (NYU)
50 David Maier (Portland State U), ACM Fellow
50 Yishay Mansour (Tel Aviv U), ACM Fellow
50 Dimitris Metaxas (Rutgers)
50 Joseph S. B. Mitchell (SUNY Stony Brook), ACM Fellow
50 Trevor Mudge (U Michigan), IEEE Fellow, ACM-IEEE CS Eckert-Mauchly Award
50 S. Muthukrishnan (Rutgers), ACM Fellow
50 Frank Pfenning (CMU)
50 Benjamin Pierce (U Penn), ACM Fellow
50 Riccardo Poli (U Essex)
50 Joel Saltz (Emory University), American Medical Informatics Association Fellow
50 Majid Sarrafzadeh (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
50 Kevin Skadron (U Virginia), IEEE Fellow
50 Sargur Srihari (SUNY Buffalo), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow
50 Alan Smeaton (Dublin City U), Member of the Royal Irish Academy
50 Douglas Stinson (U Waterloo)
50 Eva Tardos (Cornell), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IEEE Technical Achievement Award, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
50 Pascal Van Hentenryck (ANU and NICTA)
50 Michael Waidner (TU Darmstadt)
50 Darrell Whitley (Colorado State University)
50 Steve Whittaker (UC Santa Cruz), ACM Fellow
50 Zhengyou Zhang (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
50 Yuanyuan Zhou (UCSD), ACM Fellow
49 Andrew Barto (U Mass, Amherst), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
49 Bir Bhanu (UC Riverside), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow, AIMBE Fellow
49 Craig Boutilier (U Toronto), ACM Fellow
49 Andrew A. Chien (U. Chicago), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
49 Kenneth Church (IBM)
49 Philip R Cohen (Adapx Inc), AAAI Fellow,
49 David J. DeWitt (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
49 Paul Dourish (UC Irvine)
49 David Eppstein (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
49 Matthias Felleisen (Northeastern U), ACM Fellow
49 Steven Feiner (Columbia)
49 Carlos Guestrin (U Washington)
49 Leonidas J. Guibas (Stanford), ACM Fellow
49 Tian He (U Minnesota)
49 Holger Hoos (U British Columbia)
49 Hugues Hoppe (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
49 Tomasz Imielinski (Rutgers)
49 Ron Kimmel (Technion)
49 Hans-Peter Kriegel (Ludwig-Maximilians U, Munich), ACM Fellow
49 Benjamin Kuipers (U Michigan)
49 Hector Levesque (U Toronto), FRSC
49 Michael Luby (ICSI)
49 Kurt Mehlhorn (Max Planck), ACM Fellow
49 Robert Morris (MIT), ACM Fellow
49 Moni Naor (Weizmann), IACR Fellow
49 Jeffrey F. Naughton (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
49 Norman Paton (U Manchester)
49 Bart Preneel (KU Leuven)
49 Kannan Ramchandran (Berkeley)
49 Andre Schiper (EPFL)
49 Timos Sellis (RMIT, Australia)
49 Bart Selman (Cornell), ACM Fellow
49 Daniel Siewiorek (CMU), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
49 John Stasko (Georgia Tech)
49 Michael Stonebraker (MIT), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
49 V. S. Subrahmanian (U Maryland)
49 Richard S. Sutton (U Alberta)
49 Gerhard Weikum (Max Planck), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
49 David Wetherall (U Washington), ACM Fellow
49 David A. Wood (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
49 Ming-Hsuan Yang (UC Merced)
49 Justin Zobel (U Melbourne)
48 James Allan (U Mass, Amherst)
48 Franz Baader (TU Dresden), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
48 Dana Ballard (UT Austin)
48 Randal Bryant (CMU), ACM Fellow
48 Peter Buneman (U Edinburgh), ACM Fellow, Fellow of the Royal Society
48 Vince Calhoun (U New Mexico)
48 Michael J. Carey (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
48 Umeshwar Dayal (HP Labs), ACM Fellow
48 Pascal Fua (EPFL)
48 Pradeep K. Khosla (CMU), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
48 Joshua Knowles (U Manchester)
48 Simon S. Lam (UT Austin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
48 James Landay (U Washington)
48 Jerome Lang (CRNS)
48 Deborah L. McGuinness (RPI)
48 Samuel Madden (MIT)
48 Kathleen McKeown (Columbia), ACM Fellow
48 Kathryn McKinley (Microsoft), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
48 Gonzalo Navarro (U Chile)
48 Stefano Nolfi (National Research Council, Rome)
48 David Parnas (U Limerick), ACM Fellow
48 Jean-Jacques Quisquater (U Catholique de Louvain), IACR Fellow
48 Ulrike Sattler (U Manchester)
48 Mahadev Satyanarayanan (CMU), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
48 Bernt Schiele (Max Planck)
48 Steven Seitz (U Washington)
48 Yoram Singer (Google)
48 Satinder Singh (U Michigan)
48 Richard Snodgrass (U Arizona), ACM Fellow
48 Peter Steenkiste (CMU)
48 Peter Stone (UT Austin)
48 Andrew Tomkins (Google)
48 Philip Torr (Oxford Brookes U)
48 Michael N. Vrahatis (U Patras)
48 Ben Y. Zhao (UC Santa Barbara)
47 Alex Aiken (Stanford), ACM Fellow
47 Wolfgang Banzhaf (Memorial U Newfoundland)
47 Elizabeth Belding (UC Santa Barbara)
47 Mark Billinghurst (U Canterbury, New Zealand)
47 Horst Bischof (Graz U of Technology)
47 Gaetano Borriello, (U Washington), ACM Fellow
47 Robert K. Brayton (Berkeley)
47 Justine Cassell (CMU)
47 Rina Dechter (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
47 Inderjit S. Dhillon (UT Austin), ACM Fellow
47 Andrew Gordon (Microsoft)
47 Dirk Grunwald (U Colorado)
47 Carl Gutwin (U Saskatchewan)
47 Greg Hager (Johns Hopkins U)
47 Mary Jean Harrold (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow
47 Matthew Hennessy (U Sussex)
47 Maurice Herlihy (Brown U), ACM Fellow
47 C.A.R. (Tony) Hoare (Microsoft), Turing Award, Fellow of the Royal Society, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
47 Mahmut Kandemir (Penn State)
47 Leonard Kleinrock (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
47 Jim Kurose (U Mass, Amherst), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
47 Richard Lipton (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
47 Scott Mahlke (U Michigan)
47 Nasir Memon (Polytechnic Institute of NYU), IEEE Fellow
47 Jeff Offutt (George Mason U)
47 Dimitris Papadias (Hong Kong U of Sci and Tech)
47 George Pappas (U Penn)
47 Yale Patt (UT Austin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
47 Yong Rui (Microsoft), IEEE Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow
47 Shashi Shekhar (U Minnesota), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
47 Claudio Silva (NYU), IEEE Fellow
47 Mary Lou Soffa (U Virginia), ACM Fellow
47 P. N. Suganthan (Nanyang Tech U, Singapore)
47 Toby Walsh (NICTA and UNSW)
46 Henri Bal (Vrije U, Amsterdam)
46 Thomas Ball (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
46 Krishnendu Chakrabarty (Duke U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
46 Nick Duffield (AT&T Labs)
46 Max J. Egenhofer (U Maine)
46 Dror Feitelson (Hebrew U)
46 Edward A. Fox (Virginia Tech)
46 Rosario Gennaro (City College of New York)
46 Steve Gribble (U Washington)
46 Nicholas J. Higham (U Manchester), Fellow of the Royal Society, SIAM Fellow
46 John Hopcroft (Cornell), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, SIAM Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
46 Tom Hou (Virginia Tech), IEEE Fellow
46 Katsushi Ikeuchi (U Tokyo)
46 Yannis Ioannidis (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
46 Niraj K. Jha (Princeton), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
46 Eamonn Keogh (UC Riverside)
46 Joe Kilian (Rutgers)
46 Dexter Kozen (Cornell), ACM Fellow
46 Vladimir Lifschitz (UT Austin)
46 Patrick Lincoln (SRI)
46 Margaret Martonosi (Princeton), ACM Fellow
46 Kenneth McMillan (Microsoft)
46 Daniel Menasce (George Mason U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
46 Enrico Motta (The Open University, UK)
46 Zoran Obradovic (Temple U)
46 Shmuel Peleg (Hebrew U)
46 Jean Ponce (ENS)
46 Mooly Sagiv (Tel Aviv University)
46 Mary Shaw (CMU), ACM Fellow
46 Rudi Studer (Karlsruhe Inst Tech)
46 Madhu Sudan (MIT), ACM Fellow
46 Chew Lim Tan (National U Singapore)
46 Rene Vidal (Johns Hopkins U)
46 Emo Welzl (ETH Zurich), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea), Member of the German Academy of Sciences
46 Franco Zambonelli (U Modena e Reggio Emilia), IEEE Fellow
46 Matt Welsh (Google)
45 Andrei Broder (Yahoo! Research), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Samir Das (SUNY Stony Brook)
45 Michael Ernst (U Washington), ACM Fellow
45 Anja Feldmann (TU Berlin)
45 Amos Fiat (Tel Aviv U)
45 Patrick J. Flynn (U Notre Dame)
45 Bernd Hamann (UC Davis)
45 Russell Impagliazzo (UCSD)
45 M. Frans Kaashoek (MIT), ACM Fellow, ACM Infosys Foundation Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Carl Kesselman (USC/ISI)
45 Ross King (U Manchester)
45 Rich Korf (UCLA), AAAI Fellow
45 John Koza (Stanford)
45 Arvind Krishnamurthy (U Washington)
45 Rudolf Kruse (U Magdeburg), IEEE Fellow
45 Ed Lazowska, (U Washington), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Victor Lesser (U Mass, Amherst), IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow
45 Ming Li (U Waterloo), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
45 Bing Liu (U Illinois at Chicago), IEEE Fellow
45 Heikki Mannila (U Helsinki)
45 Daniel Marcu (USC)
45 Nenad Medvidovic (USC)
45 Alberto O. Mendelzon (U Toronto)
45 Bertrand Meyer (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow, ACM Software System Award, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
45 Dusit Niyato (Nanyang Technological U)
45 John Ousterhout (Stanford), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Yannis Papakonstantinou (UCSD)
45 Bijan Parsia (U Manchester)
45 Michel Raynal (IRISA)
45 Fred Schneider (Cornell), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
45 Dana Scott (CMU), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
45 Carles Sierra (Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Spain)
45 Eero P. Simoncelli (NYU), IEEE Fellow
45 Mukesh Singhal (UC Merced)
45 Marc Snir (UIUC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
45 Richard Taylor (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow
45 Murat Tekalp (Koc University, Turkey), IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
45 Mikkel Thorup (AT&T Labs and U Copenhagen), ACM Fellow, Member of the Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters
45 Athanasios Vasilakos (U Western Macedonia)
45 Jun Wang (The Chinese U of Hong Kong), IEEE Fellow
45 Jarke J. van Wijk (TU Eindhoven)
45 Niklaus Wirth (ETH Zurich), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
45 Mohammed Zaki (RPI)
45 Steven Zucker (Yale)
44 Victor Basili (U Maryland), ACM Fellow
44 Ernst Biersack (Eurecom, Sophia Antipolis, France)
44 Kenneth Birman (Cornell), ACM Fellow
44 Andrew Brass (U Manchester)
44 Carla Brodley (Tufts University), AAAI Fellow
44 Jan Camenisch (IBM Zurich), IEEE Technical Achievement Award
44 Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran (Ohio State), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAI Fellow
44 Brian Curless (U Washington)
44 Marlon Dumas (U Tartu)
44 E. Allen Emerson (UT Austin), Turing Award
44 Eleazar Eskin (UCLA)
44 Christos Faloutsos (CMU), ACM Fellow
44 Babak Falsafi (EPFL)
44 Carlo Ghezzi (Politecnico di Milano), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
44 Oded Goldreich (Weizmann), IACR Fellow
44 Shafi Goldwasser (MIT and Weizmann), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
44 Ahmed Helmy (U Florida)
44 Manuel Hermenegildo (IMDEA and U Politecnica Madrid)
44 Thomas Hofmann (Google)
44 Markus Jakobsson (Paypal)
44 Jean-Marc Jezequel (U Rennes and INRIA)
44 Thorsten Joachims (Cornell), ACM Fellow
44 Lydia Kavraki (Rice U), ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the Institute of Medicine
44 Donald Kossmann (ETH Zurich), ACM Fellow
44 Tao Li (Florida International U)
44 Gail Murphy (U British Columbia)
44 Tobias Nipkow (TU Munich)
44 Paul C. van Oorschot (Carleton U)
44 M. Tamer Özsu (U Waterloo), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
44 Franco Preparata (Brown U), ACM Fellow
44 Robbert van Renesse (Cornell), ACM Fellow
44 Rob Rutenbar (UIUC)
44 Robert E. Schapire (Princeton)
44 Victor Shoup (NYU)
44 Mateo Valero (Technical U Catalonia and Barcelona Supercomputing Center), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
44 Sabrina De Capitani di Vimercati (U degli Studi di Milano)
44 Jason Weston (Google)
44 Adam Wolisz (TU Berlin)
44 Ellen Zegura (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow
43 Andrew Appel (Princeton), ACM Fellow
43 Don Batory (UT Austin)
43 Yoshua Bengio (U Montreal)
43 Eli Biham (Technion), IACR Fellow
43 Raouf Boutaba (U Waterloo), IEEE Fellow, EIC Fellow
43 Soumen Chakrabarti (IIT Bombay)
43 Ming-Syan Chen (Academia Sinica, Taiwan), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
43 Stephen Cook (U Toronto), Turing Award
43 Dorin Comaniciu (Siemens), IEEE Fellow
43 Susan Eggers (U Washington), ACM Fellow
43 Uriel Feige (Weizmann)
43 Daniela Florescu (Oracle)
43 Robert France (Colorado State U)
43 Zvi Galil (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
43 Dennis Gannon (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
43 Michael T. Goodrich (UC Irvine), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
43 Joseph Goguen (UCSD)
43 Isabelle Guyon (ClopiNet/ChaLearn)
43 Farnam Jahanian (U Michigan), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
43 Simon Peyton Jones (Microsoft), ACM Fellow
43 Won Kim (Sung Kyun Kwan University), ACM Fellow
43 Butler Lampson (Microsoft), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
43 Baochun Li (U Toronto)
43 Barbara Liskov (MIT), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
43 Michael Luck (King's College London)
43 Satoshi Matsuoka (Tokyo Institute of Technology), ACM Fellow
43 Sharad Mehrotra (UC Irvine)
43 Risto Miikkulainen (UT Austin)
43 Robin Milner (U Cambridge), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
43 Nassir Navab (TU Munich and Johns Hopkins U)
43 Martha Stone Palmer (Colorado U)
43 Sharath Pankanti (IBM Watson)
43 Birgit Pfitzmann (IBM Zurich)
43 Dragomir Radev (U Michigan)
43 Krithi Ramamritham (IIT Bombay), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
43 Rajesh Rao (U Washington)
43 Alan Rector (U Manchester)
43 Maarten de Rijke (U Amsterdam)
43 Angela Sasse (U College London)
43 Shlomo Shamai (Technion)
43 Amnon Shashua (Hebrew U)
43 Bernhard Steffen (TU Dortmund)
43 Sung Wing Kin (National U Singapore)
43 Marilyn Walker (UC Santa Cruz)
43 Avi Wigderson (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton)
43 Pierre Wolper (U Liege)
43 Limsoon Wong (National U Singapore)
42 Karl Aberer (EPFL)
42 Gul Agha (UIUC)
42 Michael Arbib (USC)
42 Barry Boehm (USC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
42 John A. Carroll (U Sussex)
42 Ivan Damgård (Aarhus U), IACR Fellow
42 Adnan Darwiche (UCLA), AAAI Fellow
42 Luc Devroye (McGill U)
42 Josep Domingo-Ferrer (U Rovira i Virgili, Catalonia), IEEE Fellow
42 Bruce R. Donald (Duke U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
42 Keith Edwards (Georgia Tech)
42 Charles Elkan (UCSD)
42 Wulfram Gerstner (EPFL)
42 Gaston H. Gonnet (ETH Zurich)
42 Jan Friso Groote (TU Eindhoven)
42 Robert Harper (CMU), ACM Fellow
42 Wynne Hsu (National U Singapore)
42 Sitharama S. Iyengar (Florida International U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, Member of the European Academy of Sciences
42 Liviu Iftode (Rutgers)
42 Josef Kittler (Surrey U)
42 Anna Karlin (U Washington)
42 Srinivasan Keshav (U Waterloo)
42 Teuvo Kohonen (Academy of Finland), IEEE Frank Rosenblatt Award
42 Richard E. Ladner (U Washington)
42 Arjen Lenstra (EPFL), IACR Fellow
42 Miron Livny (U Wisconsin)
42 Marco Ajmone Marsan (Politecnico di Torino), IEEE Fellow
42 Jose Meseguer (UIUC)
42 Prasant Mohapatra (UC Davis), IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow
42 Fionn Murtagh (U London)
42 Andrew Y. Ng (Stanford)
42 Natasha Noy (Stanford)
42 Erkki Oja (Helsinki U of Technology)
42 Beng Chin Ooi (National U Singapore), ACM Fellow
42 Jignesh Patel (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow
42 David Poole (U British Columbia)
42 Massimiliano Pontil (U College London)
42 William Sanders (UIUC)
42 Vivek Sarkar (Rice U), ACM Fellow
42 Micha Sharir (Tel Aviv U), ACM Fellow
42 Thomas Schiex (INRIA, Toulouse)
42 Eugene Spafford (Purdue U), ACM Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
42 Dean Tullsen (UCSD), ACM Fellow
42 Wei Wang (UCLA)
42 Min Wu (U Maryland), IEEE Fellow
42 Alexander Wolf (Imperial College, London), ACM Fellow
42 Willy Zwaenepoel (EPFL), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
41 Emile Aarts (TU Eindhoven)
41 Mikhail Atallah (Purdue U), ACM Fellow
41 Manuel Blum (CMU), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Engineering, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
41 Alan Borning (U Washington)
41 Terrance E. Boult (U Colorado at Colorado Springs)
41 Srdjan Capkun (ETH Zurich)
41 Ed G. Coffman (Columbia), ACM Fellow
41 Joelle Coutaz (U Joseph Fourier, Grenoble)
41 Stephane Ducasse (INRIA Lille)
41 Cynthia Dwork (Microsoft), Member of the National Academy of Engineering
41 Boi Faltings (EPFL)
41 Lance Fortnow (Georgia Tech), ACM Fellow
41 Harold Gabow (U Colorado), ACM Fellow
41 Patrice Godefroid (Microsoft)
41 Luis Gravano (Columbia)
41 Jonathan Hull (Ricoh), IAPR Fellow
41 Mary Jane Irwin (Penn State), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
41 Michael Kearns (U Penn), ACM Fellow
41 David Lowe (U British Columbia)
41 Kwan-Liu Ma (UC Davis)
41 Jan Mendling (WU Vienna)
41 Dale Miller (INRIA)
41 Marvin Minsky (MIT), Turing Award
41 Michael Mozer (U Colorado)
41 Ian Munro (U Waterloo)
41 Richard Muntz (UCLA), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
41 Sharon Oviatt (Incaa Designs)
41 Jens Palsberg (UCLA)
41 Stefano Paraboschi (U Bergamo)
41 Lawrence C. Paulson (U Cambridge), ACM Fellow
41 Gian Pietro Picco (U Trento)
41 Viktor Prasanna (USC), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
41 Arun Somani (Iowa State)
41 Aravind Srinivasan (U Maryland), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
41 Jean-Philippe Thiran (EPFL)
41 Sam Toueg (U Toronto)
41 Uzi Vishkin (U Maryland), ACM Fellow
41 Haixun Wang (Google)
41 Ke Wang (Simon Fraser U)
41 Manfred K. Warmuth (UC Santa Cruz)
41 William Weihl (Facebook)
41 Andrew Yao (Tsinghua U), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, IACR Fellow
41 Eric Yu (U Toronto)
41 Feng Zhao (Microsoft), IEEE Fellow
40 Leonard Adleman (USC), Turing Award
40 Andrea Arpaci-Dusseau (U Wisconsin)
40 Amotz Bar-Noy (Brooklyn College)
40 Craig Chambers (Google)
40 Sunghyun Choi (Seoul National U)
40 Edmund M. Clarke (CMU), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Jan Chomicki (SUNY Buffalo)
40 David Corne (Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh)
40 Edsger Dijkstra (UT Austin), Turing Award
40 Herbert Edelsbrunner (Duke U), Member of Academy of Europe (Academia Europaea)
40 Thomas Ertl (U Stuttgart)
40 Nick Feamster (Georgia Tech)
40 Cormac Flanagan (UCSC)
40 Edward Feigenbaum (Stanford), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, AAAI Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Yoav Freund (UCSD), AAAI Fellow
40 Venu Govindaraju (U Buffalo), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow, AAAS Fellow, IAPR Fellow, SPIE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award
40 Manish Gupta (Goldman Sachs), ACM Fellow
40 Hannes Hartenstein (Karlsruhe Inst Tech)
40 Pavol Hell (Simon Fraser U)
40 Neil D. Jones (DIKU, U Copenhagen), ACM Fellow
40 Ari Juels (RSA)
40 Philipp Koehn (U Edinburgh and Johns Hopkins U)
40 Pedro Larranaga (Technical U Madrid)
40 Seong-Whan Lee (Korea University), IEEE Fellow
40 Brian Neil Levine (U Mass, Amherst)
40 Nancy Lynch (MIT), ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Rupak Majumdar (Max Planck and UCLA)
40 Ralph Martin (Cardiff U), Fellow of the British Computer Society
40 Maja Mataric (USC)
40 John Mitchell (Stanford), ACM Fellow
40 David McAllester (Toyota Tech Inst), AAAI Fellow
40 John McCarthy (Stanford), Turing Award, ACM Fellow, Member of the National Academy of Engineering
40 Luc Moreau (U Southampton)
40 Oscar Nierstrasz (U Bern)
40 David Notkin (U Washington), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
40 John Owens (UC Davis)
40 Mark Pauly (EPFL)
40 Andrzej Pelc (U Quebec en Outaouais)
40 David Pennock (Microsoft)
40 Charles E. Perkins (Nokia-Siemens Networks)
40 Michael O. Rabin (Harvard), Turing Award, Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Member of the French Academy of Sciences, Member of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, IACR Fellow, Member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences
40 Sudhakar Reddy (U Iowa), IEEE Fellow
40 Raymond Reiter (U Toronto), ACM Fellow
40 Pablo Rodriguez Rodriguez (Telefonica Research)
40 Yehoshua Sagiv (Hebrew U)
40 Sunita Sarawagi (IIT Bombay)
40 Mihaela van der Schaar (UCLA), IEEE Fellow
40 Assaf Schuster (Technion)
40 Cyrus Shahabi (USC), IEEE Fellow
40 Linda Shapiro (U Washington)
40 Anand Sivasubramaniam (Penn State)
40 Gurindar S. Sohi (U Wisconsin), ACM Fellow, IEEE Fellow
40 Jacques Stern (ENS, Paris), IACR Fellow
40 S. Sudarshan (IIT Bombay), ACM Fellow
40 Paul Syverson (U.S. Naval Research Laboratory), ACM Fellow
40 Patrick Thiran (EPFL)
40 John K. Tsotsos (York U, Canada), FRSC
40 Ruediger Urbanke (EPFL)
40 Frits Vaandrager (Radboud U Nijmegen)
40 Leslie Valiant (Harvard), Turing Award, ACM Fellow
40 Victor Vianu (UCSD), ACM Fellow
40 James H. Wilkinson (National Physical Laboratory, England), Turing Award
40 Xing Xie (Microsoft)
40 Shuicheng Yan (National U Singapore)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)