nasal height
But for a long time, Asian noses, which on average have a much flatter
nasal bridge, were somewhat befuddling for Franciscus. His research had
led him to believe that a more pronounced nasal bridge would be more
what you’d expect for the cold, dry conditions of northern Asia. Which
is one reason why his most recent thinking downplays the importance of
respiratory adaptation as a prime determinant of the external shape of
the nose among different groups. The internal nasal cavity appears to be
much more important, he says.
“If you look at Asian noses internally they are long and high and narrow, exactly like what you would expect for European populations,” Franciscus says.
“If you look at Asian noses internally they are long and high and narrow, exactly like what you would expect for European populations,” Franciscus says.
Nanking Massacre was not gov policy
>>1883336
Nanking Massacre was not Japanese gov policy
Following the fall of Nanking, Japanese soldiers in the city massacred POWs and engaged in random acts of murder, looting, and rape which are collectively known as the Nanking Massacre.[63] Earlier Matsui and his staff officers in the CCAA had foreseen the possibility that their troops might misbehave upon entering Nanking, as many of them were poorly disciplined reservists,[64] and they were especially intent on ensuring that the property and citizens of third party nations were not harmed in order to avoid causing an international incident.[61] To forestall this possibility, Matsui tacked a lengthy addendum entitled "Essentials for Assaulting Nanking" onto the comprehensive operational orders that he passed down to all units on December 7.[64][65] In "Essentials" Matsui instructed each of his divisions to only allow one of their regiments into the city itself in order to reduce the Japanese Army's contact with Chinese civilians, and he reminded all his subordinates that criminal acts like looting or arson would be severely punished.[64][66] Ultimately, Matsui's orders were again disobeyed.[64][67] Most of the buildings and civilian homes outside Nanking had been burned down by the Chinese Army to deprive the Japanese of shelter, so Matsui's subordinate commanders decided on their own that they had no choice but to station all their men within the city itself.[64]
Nevertheless, Matsui's instructions said nothing about treatment of Chinese POWs.[35][68] Matsui would inadvertently contribute to the atrocity in a major way when he demanded on December 14 that his triumphal entrance into Nanking be scheduled for the early date of December 17.[69] At the time his subordinates in Nanking objected because they were still in the process of scrambling to apprehend all the former Chinese soldiers hiding in the city and had no facilities in which to hold them.[69] Regardless, Matsui held firm, and in many cases his men responded to the conundrum by ordering that all their prisoners be executed immediately after capture.[69] Most of the large-scale massacres that took place within Nanking occurred in the days immediately prior to Matsui's entrance into the city.[69]
Iwane Matsui riding into Nanking on December 17
On December 16 Matsui spent the day recovering from his malaria at the hot springs in Tangshuizhen, a city not far from Nanking, and then the next day he rode into Nanking itself at the head of a large victory parade.[70] It is not clear to what extent Matsui was aware of the atrocities perpetrated in Nanking. His former Chief of Staff in the SEA later testified that Matsui had been informed of "a few cases of plunder and outrage" shortly after entering the city,[71] and Matsui's own field diary also mentions being told that Japanese troops had committed acts of rape and looting.[72] Matsui commented in his field diary that, "The truth is that some such acts are unavoidable."[73] When a representative from the Japanese Foreign Ministry came to investigate the matter, Matsui admitted that some crimes had occurred and he blamed his subordinate commanders for allowing too many soldiers into the city in violation of his orders.[74] After the war, Matsui's aide-de-camp Yoshiharu Sumi claimed that not long after the capture of Nanking Matsui caught wind of a plan by some of his subordinates to massacre Chinese POWs and upon hearing of this he immediately put a stop to it.[75] However researchers have since discovered that Sumi's testimony contained a large number of inaccuracies.[76][77]
Matsui left Nanking on December 22 and returned to Shanghai, though reports of scandalous incidents perpetrated by Japanese soldiers in Nanking continued to filter in to his headquarters over the following month.[78] When Matsui returned to Nanking on February 7, 1938 for a two-day tour he assembled his subordinates, including Prince Asaka and Heisuke Yanagawa, and harangued them for failing to prevent "a number of abominable incidents within the past 50 days".[72][79][80][81]
In Japan the majority of the historical literature on Iwane Matsui's life focuses on his role in the Nanking Massacre.[117] He has both sympathizers, who depict him as "the tragic general" who was unjustly executed, and detractors, who assert that he had the blood of a massacre on his hands.[3][117] Among his detractors are the historian Yutaka Yoshida, who believes that Matsui made six serious mistakes which contributed to the massacre.[68] First, he insisted on advancing on Nanking without ensuring proper logistical support which forced his men to rely on plunder. Second, he established no policies to protect the safety of Chinese POWs. Third, he permitted an excessively large number of soldiers to enter the city of Nanking. Fourth, he did not cooperate sufficiently with the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone. Fifth, he insisted that his triumphal entrance into Nanking be held at an early date, a demand which his subordinate commanders responded to by increasing the speed and severity of their mopping up operations. Finally, he spent too much time on political maneuvering and neglected his duties as commander.
Nanking Massacre was not Japanese gov policy
Following the fall of Nanking, Japanese soldiers in the city massacred POWs and engaged in random acts of murder, looting, and rape which are collectively known as the Nanking Massacre.[63] Earlier Matsui and his staff officers in the CCAA had foreseen the possibility that their troops might misbehave upon entering Nanking, as many of them were poorly disciplined reservists,[64] and they were especially intent on ensuring that the property and citizens of third party nations were not harmed in order to avoid causing an international incident.[61] To forestall this possibility, Matsui tacked a lengthy addendum entitled "Essentials for Assaulting Nanking" onto the comprehensive operational orders that he passed down to all units on December 7.[64][65] In "Essentials" Matsui instructed each of his divisions to only allow one of their regiments into the city itself in order to reduce the Japanese Army's contact with Chinese civilians, and he reminded all his subordinates that criminal acts like looting or arson would be severely punished.[64][66] Ultimately, Matsui's orders were again disobeyed.[64][67] Most of the buildings and civilian homes outside Nanking had been burned down by the Chinese Army to deprive the Japanese of shelter, so Matsui's subordinate commanders decided on their own that they had no choice but to station all their men within the city itself.[64]
Nevertheless, Matsui's instructions said nothing about treatment of Chinese POWs.[35][68] Matsui would inadvertently contribute to the atrocity in a major way when he demanded on December 14 that his triumphal entrance into Nanking be scheduled for the early date of December 17.[69] At the time his subordinates in Nanking objected because they were still in the process of scrambling to apprehend all the former Chinese soldiers hiding in the city and had no facilities in which to hold them.[69] Regardless, Matsui held firm, and in many cases his men responded to the conundrum by ordering that all their prisoners be executed immediately after capture.[69] Most of the large-scale massacres that took place within Nanking occurred in the days immediately prior to Matsui's entrance into the city.[69]
Iwane Matsui riding into Nanking on December 17
On December 16 Matsui spent the day recovering from his malaria at the hot springs in Tangshuizhen, a city not far from Nanking, and then the next day he rode into Nanking itself at the head of a large victory parade.[70] It is not clear to what extent Matsui was aware of the atrocities perpetrated in Nanking. His former Chief of Staff in the SEA later testified that Matsui had been informed of "a few cases of plunder and outrage" shortly after entering the city,[71] and Matsui's own field diary also mentions being told that Japanese troops had committed acts of rape and looting.[72] Matsui commented in his field diary that, "The truth is that some such acts are unavoidable."[73] When a representative from the Japanese Foreign Ministry came to investigate the matter, Matsui admitted that some crimes had occurred and he blamed his subordinate commanders for allowing too many soldiers into the city in violation of his orders.[74] After the war, Matsui's aide-de-camp Yoshiharu Sumi claimed that not long after the capture of Nanking Matsui caught wind of a plan by some of his subordinates to massacre Chinese POWs and upon hearing of this he immediately put a stop to it.[75] However researchers have since discovered that Sumi's testimony contained a large number of inaccuracies.[76][77]
Matsui left Nanking on December 22 and returned to Shanghai, though reports of scandalous incidents perpetrated by Japanese soldiers in Nanking continued to filter in to his headquarters over the following month.[78] When Matsui returned to Nanking on February 7, 1938 for a two-day tour he assembled his subordinates, including Prince Asaka and Heisuke Yanagawa, and harangued them for failing to prevent "a number of abominable incidents within the past 50 days".[72][79][80][81]
In Japan the majority of the historical literature on Iwane Matsui's life focuses on his role in the Nanking Massacre.[117] He has both sympathizers, who depict him as "the tragic general" who was unjustly executed, and detractors, who assert that he had the blood of a massacre on his hands.[3][117] Among his detractors are the historian Yutaka Yoshida, who believes that Matsui made six serious mistakes which contributed to the massacre.[68] First, he insisted on advancing on Nanking without ensuring proper logistical support which forced his men to rely on plunder. Second, he established no policies to protect the safety of Chinese POWs. Third, he permitted an excessively large number of soldiers to enter the city of Nanking. Fourth, he did not cooperate sufficiently with the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone. Fifth, he insisted that his triumphal entrance into Nanking be held at an early date, a demand which his subordinate commanders responded to by increasing the speed and severity of their mopping up operations. Finally, he spent too much time on political maneuvering and neglected his duties as commander.
japanese liberation documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=_PwbHPaGWLw#t=463
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=_PwbHPaGWLw#t=144
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=_PwbHPaGWLw#t=144
engineering quality asians
Conventional wisdom holds that the typical engineer or scientist in
India or China might work for an outsourced service provider doing
low-end computer programming in return for meager wages. Similarly, it’s
thought that the main reason Western companies hire offshore engineers
is to supply markets in China and India with stripped-down versions of
American products at rock-bottom prices.
The remarkable reality is that many big American R&D spenders have undergone a quiet transformation of their product development capabilities during the last decade that includes embedding Asian capabilities much closer to the core of their operation. Offshore engineering centers have become central to businesses such as Microsoft, Abobe, and Synopsys. But there are just as many companies still stuck in outdated ways of thinking about their R&D. In our experience, there are three myths that keep companies from realizing the potential of offshore engineering talent:
Software only: R&D centers in emerging markets shouldn’t be viewed solely as places to develop low-cost software. Forward-looking companies use Asian R&D for a broad range of product development.
In July 2014, FMC Corporation, which makes agricultural products to increase crop yields, ingredients to enhance food texture and stability, and lithium products to improve battery performance, opened an R&D Center at Zhangjiang High-tech Park in Shanghai, China to undertake process research in organic and organo-metallic chemistry for the company’s global agrochemicals and specialty chemicals markets.
Mylan synthesizes active pharmaceutical ingredients in Mumbai and Hyderabad, and Air Products runs an advanced gas applications laboratory in Shanghai. And one of us (Bagla) has advised a consumer products company to design home care appliances and a medical devices company to develop dental consumables—both using Asian engineers.
Low-end, peripheral work only: The reality is that Asian engineering centers are now central to the success of many American companies. One measure is head count. Cadence, Infinera, Microchip, Microsemi, Synopsys, Teradata, Texas Instruments, and VM Ware are among the companies to state their second largest R&D teams are located in India or China. Some companies have more engineers in India than in the United States. Without the Asian teams these companies would be unable to design new products anymore.
Some time ago, Adobe said that over 200 patent filings for its products had originated from its engineers located in Noida, outside of New Delhi and that 20 of its products were run completely from India. The company has invested well over $300 million in India. In an interview with ZDNet, Niranjan Maka, managing site director at VMware India’s research and development unit revealed that engineers in Pune had created 47 invention disclosure filings in one year.
Cadence has over 900 technical employees in Noida and also maintains staff in Bangalore, Pune and Hyderabad. The India operation works on electronic design automation software and Intellectual Property. Synopsys shared, “Initially, our site here [in India] did mostly quality checking of products; now we have advanced R&D in simulation and testing here, and we have direct support for a number of customers from here that is quite advanced. The fact that in the semiconductor domain today we have the largest Synopsys Users Group Conference in India is quite remarkable.”
Executives who are willing to stick their neck out to better integrate offshore teams into the mainstream product innovation pipeline are often able to minimize employee turnover and truly leverage Asian talent fully. On the other hand enterprises that globalize their engineering teams purely for cost reduction often tend to battle fear and loathing on the American side while their best Asian talent moves on quickly to competitors.
Local markets only: The most pervasive myth is that offshore engineers cannot design products for American markets. This may have been true a few decades ago. But modular product design, object-oriented programming, and sophisticated global supply chains have largely rendered these objections obsolete.
For example, console video games such as those played on Sony PlayStations or Microsoft Xboxes were virtually non-existent in India a decade ago. Yet the erstwhile Midway Games had testers in India perform much of the Quality Assurance for games such as Mortal Kombat. “We installed a video game lounge, so testers could familiarize themselves with the various genres and game-playing techniques,” Paul Sterngold, who sponsored the program remembers in a personal interview with one of us (Bagla). “We trained a team of engineers first to play these games and then to test them robustly. After a somewhat painful training curve, the offshore team was actually able to match California-based testers in productivity.” Today most large video game product development includes significant contributions in art, animation, engineering and QA from Asian teams.
Casino gambling is only permitted in two tiny Indian states and revenues are miniscule by Las Vegas standards. Despite the absence of a local market, Bally Technologies, which spent over $111 million on R&D in 2013, maintains two of its four major R&D centers in Chennai and Bangalore India; the other two are in Las Vegas and Reno, respectively. It leases 128,000 square feet of space in India according to a 2013 filing and earlier reports stated that the company (now merged into Scientific Gaming) had over 700 employees in India, almost a quarter of its global workforce at the time.
These three myths no longer reflect reality. Companies increasingly rely on engineering talent in China and India to drive product development across a wider range of new products and for a wider range of markets. Perhaps the Taiwanese-American CEO of graphics chipmaker NVIDIA Corporation, Jen Hsun-Huang, put it best when he visited Bangalore to inaugurate their R&D center there: “We know from experience that India is home to some of the world’s brightest engineers, as many of our top employees today are originally from there.” The company also runs a similar center in Shanghai.
The remarkable reality is that many big American R&D spenders have undergone a quiet transformation of their product development capabilities during the last decade that includes embedding Asian capabilities much closer to the core of their operation. Offshore engineering centers have become central to businesses such as Microsoft, Abobe, and Synopsys. But there are just as many companies still stuck in outdated ways of thinking about their R&D. In our experience, there are three myths that keep companies from realizing the potential of offshore engineering talent:
Software only: R&D centers in emerging markets shouldn’t be viewed solely as places to develop low-cost software. Forward-looking companies use Asian R&D for a broad range of product development.
In July 2014, FMC Corporation, which makes agricultural products to increase crop yields, ingredients to enhance food texture and stability, and lithium products to improve battery performance, opened an R&D Center at Zhangjiang High-tech Park in Shanghai, China to undertake process research in organic and organo-metallic chemistry for the company’s global agrochemicals and specialty chemicals markets.
Mylan synthesizes active pharmaceutical ingredients in Mumbai and Hyderabad, and Air Products runs an advanced gas applications laboratory in Shanghai. And one of us (Bagla) has advised a consumer products company to design home care appliances and a medical devices company to develop dental consumables—both using Asian engineers.
Low-end, peripheral work only: The reality is that Asian engineering centers are now central to the success of many American companies. One measure is head count. Cadence, Infinera, Microchip, Microsemi, Synopsys, Teradata, Texas Instruments, and VM Ware are among the companies to state their second largest R&D teams are located in India or China. Some companies have more engineers in India than in the United States. Without the Asian teams these companies would be unable to design new products anymore.
Some time ago, Adobe said that over 200 patent filings for its products had originated from its engineers located in Noida, outside of New Delhi and that 20 of its products were run completely from India. The company has invested well over $300 million in India. In an interview with ZDNet, Niranjan Maka, managing site director at VMware India’s research and development unit revealed that engineers in Pune had created 47 invention disclosure filings in one year.
Cadence has over 900 technical employees in Noida and also maintains staff in Bangalore, Pune and Hyderabad. The India operation works on electronic design automation software and Intellectual Property. Synopsys shared, “Initially, our site here [in India] did mostly quality checking of products; now we have advanced R&D in simulation and testing here, and we have direct support for a number of customers from here that is quite advanced. The fact that in the semiconductor domain today we have the largest Synopsys Users Group Conference in India is quite remarkable.”
Executives who are willing to stick their neck out to better integrate offshore teams into the mainstream product innovation pipeline are often able to minimize employee turnover and truly leverage Asian talent fully. On the other hand enterprises that globalize their engineering teams purely for cost reduction often tend to battle fear and loathing on the American side while their best Asian talent moves on quickly to competitors.
Local markets only: The most pervasive myth is that offshore engineers cannot design products for American markets. This may have been true a few decades ago. But modular product design, object-oriented programming, and sophisticated global supply chains have largely rendered these objections obsolete.
For example, console video games such as those played on Sony PlayStations or Microsoft Xboxes were virtually non-existent in India a decade ago. Yet the erstwhile Midway Games had testers in India perform much of the Quality Assurance for games such as Mortal Kombat. “We installed a video game lounge, so testers could familiarize themselves with the various genres and game-playing techniques,” Paul Sterngold, who sponsored the program remembers in a personal interview with one of us (Bagla). “We trained a team of engineers first to play these games and then to test them robustly. After a somewhat painful training curve, the offshore team was actually able to match California-based testers in productivity.” Today most large video game product development includes significant contributions in art, animation, engineering and QA from Asian teams.
Casino gambling is only permitted in two tiny Indian states and revenues are miniscule by Las Vegas standards. Despite the absence of a local market, Bally Technologies, which spent over $111 million on R&D in 2013, maintains two of its four major R&D centers in Chennai and Bangalore India; the other two are in Las Vegas and Reno, respectively. It leases 128,000 square feet of space in India according to a 2013 filing and earlier reports stated that the company (now merged into Scientific Gaming) had over 700 employees in India, almost a quarter of its global workforce at the time.
These three myths no longer reflect reality. Companies increasingly rely on engineering talent in China and India to drive product development across a wider range of new products and for a wider range of markets. Perhaps the Taiwanese-American CEO of graphics chipmaker NVIDIA Corporation, Jen Hsun-Huang, put it best when he visited Bangalore to inaugurate their R&D center there: “We know from experience that India is home to some of the world’s brightest engineers, as many of our top employees today are originally from there.” The company also runs a similar center in Shanghai.
>>1858481
>lol, mp3 players are just data drives with headphones, gooks invented neither
You're such a tech illiterate, and you can take any invention and show it's made of earlier inventions. A car is four motors and a seat.
It's not just data drives though. It's a specialized operating system for a specialized computer, made specifically to cheaply and quickly play you your media back in realtime. Calling an mp3 player 'just a data drive with headphones', is like calling a pc 'just a data drive'. It's so much more than just an HDD, or an SSD. It's a processor, an operating system, peripherals, and so much more.
Go read a book on technology and come back when you can understand it, kike. What have your people invented?
>lol, mp3 players are just data drives with headphones, gooks invented neither
You're such a tech illiterate, and you can take any invention and show it's made of earlier inventions. A car is four motors and a seat.
It's not just data drives though. It's a specialized operating system for a specialized computer, made specifically to cheaply and quickly play you your media back in realtime. Calling an mp3 player 'just a data drive with headphones', is like calling a pc 'just a data drive'. It's so much more than just an HDD, or an SSD. It's a processor, an operating system, peripherals, and so much more.
Go read a book on technology and come back when you can understand it, kike. What have your people invented?
asian man look like a woman androgenous feminine
http://www.odditycentral.com/pics/androgynous-male-model-understandably-mistaken-for-a-girl-on-asian-websites.html
LOL
▶ 204f1c No.1852026>>1852032
>How autistic do you have to be to not know how to react when someone gets his hand all over your girl like that, people usually get cucked behind their back but this is just fucking shameful.
it's a totally alien situation to them because they are a polite culture. they have never experienced someone grabbing their woman like that before. so when some big white oaf comes along and molests their women they are just confused. it would be like if some primitive alien pigman grabbed your wife, you would probably be a little bewildered and not know how to react too.
science parity
non whites: 4 chinese + 2 muslims + 1 japanese + 1 chinese + 3 indian + 1 indian + 1 chinese + 1 korean + 2 thai + 3 chinese + 1 japanese + 4 indians + 5 japanese + 1 malaysian + 1 pakistan + 1 mongolian + 5 chinese + 3 chinese + 2 persian
(1 japanese + 1 japanese + 1 indian + 1 somalian)
39 + 4 = 43
whites: 1 french + 1 portuguese + 2 german + 1 swiss + 1 polish + 1 netherland + 3 italians + 1 cuban + 1 italian + 1 italian + 1 british + 2 germans + 1 italian + 1 german + 1 austrian + 1 italian + 1 british + 3 dutch + 1 white + 1 german (1 british + 1 italian + 1 greek + 1 spanish + 1 italian + 1 swiss + 1 english + 1 german + 1 italian + 1 french + 2 italian + 1 polish + 1 french + 1 white + 1 british)
26 + 17 = 43
()* research paper with around 20 authors
http://top25.sciencedirect.com/subject/physics-and-astronomy/21/archive/59/
(1 japanese + 1 japanese + 1 indian + 1 somalian)
39 + 4 = 43
whites: 1 french + 1 portuguese + 2 german + 1 swiss + 1 polish + 1 netherland + 3 italians + 1 cuban + 1 italian + 1 italian + 1 british + 2 germans + 1 italian + 1 german + 1 austrian + 1 italian + 1 british + 3 dutch + 1 white + 1 german (1 british + 1 italian + 1 greek + 1 spanish + 1 italian + 1 swiss + 1 english + 1 german + 1 italian + 1 french + 2 italian + 1 polish + 1 french + 1 white + 1 british)
26 + 17 = 43
()* research paper with around 20 authors
http://top25.sciencedirect.com/subject/physics-and-astronomy/21/archive/59/
Asian giftedness
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fRm8rvRDYJg#t=405
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0Cm_wFnQ60
Joseph Renzulli's (1978) "three ring" definition of giftedness is one frequently mentioned conceptualization of giftedness. Renzulli's definition, which defines gifted behaviors rather than gifted individuals, is composed of three components as follows: Gifted behavior consists of behaviors that reflect an interaction among three basic clusters of human traits—above average ability, high levels of task commitment, and high levels of creativity.[10] Individuals capable of developing gifted behavior are those possessing or capable of developing this composite set of traits and applying them to any potentially valuable area of human performance. Persons who manifest or are capable of developing an interaction among the three clusters require a wide variety of educational opportunities and services that are not ordinarily provided through regular instructional programs.
While White students represent the majority of students enrolled in gifted programs, Black and Hispanic students constitute a percentage less than their enrollment in school.[30] For example, statistics from 1993 indicate that in the U.S., Black students represented 16.2% of public school students, but only constituted 8.4% of students enrolled in gifted education programs. Similarly, while Hispanic students represented 9% of public school students, these students only represented 4.7% of those identified as gifted.[31] However, Asian students make up only 3.6% of the student body, yet constitute 14% in the gifted programs.
In a plenary address at the annual Congress of the American National Association for Gifted Children in November 1985, Sternberg reported that the number of students of Asian background in American programmes for gifted children exceeded the normative expectations from population figures by a factor of five. Entrance to programmes for gifted children in the U.S. is usually set at a level to accommodate moderately gifted children rather than the highly or exceptionally gifted; thus an interesting pattern seems to be developing an over-representation of Asian children by a factor of five in the population of moderately gifted students and by a considerably greater factor-15 or over among the exceptionally gifted. A student has to be extremely gifted mathematically to score more than 700 on the SAT-M by the age of 13; only 4 per cent of college-bound 17 and 18 year olds in the U.S. attain such a score!
To illustrate this point: in a normal population with a mean IQ of 100, and a standard deviation of 15, 228 children in every 10,000 would have an IQ score two standard deviations above the mean, that is, a score of IQ 130 or higher. However, with a mean shift upwards of half a standard deviation, as reported by Jensen for Asian Americans, no fewer than 668 children in 10,000 would score in the IQ 130+ range. Many American gifted programmes which employ an IQ criterion for entrance set their entry level at IQ 130; in this situation, 6.68 per cent of Asian children would be eligible to enter these programmes on the basis of IQ as opposed to only 2.28 per cent of Caucasian children-an overrepresentation by a factor of 2.93. Yet Sternberg reports an overrepresentation by a factor of 5! Why do American gifted programmes contain almost twice the number of Asians than could be statistically expected from Jensen's projections. The children of this study have scored at or above IQ 160 on the Standford-Binet Intelligence Test L-M, an instrument with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation fo 16. Thus these children score at least 3.75 standard deviations above the mean. Fewer than 9 children in 100,000 score at or beyond this level. However, if we shift the mean upwards by 0.5 of a standard deviation, to investigate the implications of Jensen's findings and if we assume the standard deviation for the Asian population to be the same as that for non-Asians, then the criterion score of IQ 160 for entrance to this study becomes only 3.25 standard deviations above the new mean. Beyond this point lie not 9, but 58, children in 100,000. If Jensen's findings regarding a higher Asian mean are correct, and if they hold good for the Asian-Australian population as well as Asian-Americans, then we could expect to find Asian-Australians over-represented in the study by a factor of 6.5. Yet the over-representation actually found id an astonishing 15.6!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0Cm_wFnQ60
Joseph Renzulli's (1978) "three ring" definition of giftedness is one frequently mentioned conceptualization of giftedness. Renzulli's definition, which defines gifted behaviors rather than gifted individuals, is composed of three components as follows: Gifted behavior consists of behaviors that reflect an interaction among three basic clusters of human traits—above average ability, high levels of task commitment, and high levels of creativity.[10] Individuals capable of developing gifted behavior are those possessing or capable of developing this composite set of traits and applying them to any potentially valuable area of human performance. Persons who manifest or are capable of developing an interaction among the three clusters require a wide variety of educational opportunities and services that are not ordinarily provided through regular instructional programs.
While White students represent the majority of students enrolled in gifted programs, Black and Hispanic students constitute a percentage less than their enrollment in school.[30] For example, statistics from 1993 indicate that in the U.S., Black students represented 16.2% of public school students, but only constituted 8.4% of students enrolled in gifted education programs. Similarly, while Hispanic students represented 9% of public school students, these students only represented 4.7% of those identified as gifted.[31] However, Asian students make up only 3.6% of the student body, yet constitute 14% in the gifted programs.
In a plenary address at the annual Congress of the American National Association for Gifted Children in November 1985, Sternberg reported that the number of students of Asian background in American programmes for gifted children exceeded the normative expectations from population figures by a factor of five. Entrance to programmes for gifted children in the U.S. is usually set at a level to accommodate moderately gifted children rather than the highly or exceptionally gifted; thus an interesting pattern seems to be developing an over-representation of Asian children by a factor of five in the population of moderately gifted students and by a considerably greater factor-15 or over among the exceptionally gifted. A student has to be extremely gifted mathematically to score more than 700 on the SAT-M by the age of 13; only 4 per cent of college-bound 17 and 18 year olds in the U.S. attain such a score!
To illustrate this point: in a normal population with a mean IQ of 100, and a standard deviation of 15, 228 children in every 10,000 would have an IQ score two standard deviations above the mean, that is, a score of IQ 130 or higher. However, with a mean shift upwards of half a standard deviation, as reported by Jensen for Asian Americans, no fewer than 668 children in 10,000 would score in the IQ 130+ range. Many American gifted programmes which employ an IQ criterion for entrance set their entry level at IQ 130; in this situation, 6.68 per cent of Asian children would be eligible to enter these programmes on the basis of IQ as opposed to only 2.28 per cent of Caucasian children-an overrepresentation by a factor of 2.93. Yet Sternberg reports an overrepresentation by a factor of 5! Why do American gifted programmes contain almost twice the number of Asians than could be statistically expected from Jensen's projections. The children of this study have scored at or above IQ 160 on the Standford-Binet Intelligence Test L-M, an instrument with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation fo 16. Thus these children score at least 3.75 standard deviations above the mean. Fewer than 9 children in 100,000 score at or beyond this level. However, if we shift the mean upwards by 0.5 of a standard deviation, to investigate the implications of Jensen's findings and if we assume the standard deviation for the Asian population to be the same as that for non-Asians, then the criterion score of IQ 160 for entrance to this study becomes only 3.25 standard deviations above the new mean. Beyond this point lie not 9, but 58, children in 100,000. If Jensen's findings regarding a higher Asian mean are correct, and if they hold good for the Asian-Australian population as well as Asian-Americans, then we could expect to find Asian-Australians over-represented in the study by a factor of 6.5. Yet the over-representation actually found id an astonishing 15.6!
Japan colonial development and industrialization
Chomsky writes that one of the philosophical foundations to Free Market economics is that the 'level-playing field'. However, the countries now advocating for worldwide Free Market reforms became wealthy under conditions of extreme protectionism. Europe, the U.S. and Japan developed 'by radically violating approved Free Market doctrine. He argues the same is true for the East Asian growth areas of today. Japan and the U.S. were able to develop, as they escaped European colonization. Japan developed its colonies in East Asia at relatively the same pace as itself, which had led to these colonies becoming world economic powers in their own rights through protectionist measures such as the limiting of capital flow. Midgley has shown how Asia's development experience leads to a rejection of the idea that state intervention is an impediment to economic growth or that it is an instrument of injustice. Instead statist intervention has contributed to Asia's positive development with huge reductions of poverty and remakably even income distributions. This is in constrast to the colonies of Europe, which were heavily exploited.
Japan is the only colonial power to have located various heavy industries--steel, chemicals, hydro-electric power--in its colonies, a remarkable fact when considered comparatively. They were built during the second phase of Japanese industrialization and probably accounted for about a quarter of Japan's industrial base by 1945.
Japan is the only colonial power to have located various heavy industries--steel, chemicals, hydro-electric power--in its colonies, a remarkable fact when considered comparatively. They were built during the second phase of Japanese industrialization and probably accounted for about a quarter of Japan's industrial base by 1945.
70% of engineers with PhDs who graduate from U.S. universities are foreign-born
I’ve visited more than 100 countries in the past several years,
meeting people from all walks of life, from impoverished children in
India to heads of state. Almost every adult I’ve talked with in these
countries shares a belief that the path to success is paved with science
and engineering.
In fact, scientists and engineers are celebrities in most countries. They’re not seen as geeks or misfits, as they too often are in the U.S., but rather as society’s leaders and innovators. In China, eight of the top nine political posts are held by engineers. In the U.S., almost no engineers or scientists are engaged in high-level politics, and there is a virtual absence of engineers in our public policy debates.
Why does this matter? Because if American students have a negative impression – or no impression at all – of science and engineering, then they’re hardly likely to choose them as professions. Already, 70% of engineers with PhD’s who graduate from U.S. universities are foreign-born. Increasingly, these talented individuals are not staying in the U.S – instead, they’re returning home, where they find greater opportunities.
In fact, scientists and engineers are celebrities in most countries. They’re not seen as geeks or misfits, as they too often are in the U.S., but rather as society’s leaders and innovators. In China, eight of the top nine political posts are held by engineers. In the U.S., almost no engineers or scientists are engaged in high-level politics, and there is a virtual absence of engineers in our public policy debates.
Why does this matter? Because if American students have a negative impression – or no impression at all – of science and engineering, then they’re hardly likely to choose them as professions. Already, 70% of engineers with PhD’s who graduate from U.S. universities are foreign-born. Increasingly, these talented individuals are not staying in the U.S – instead, they’re returning home, where they find greater opportunities.
ashley montagu mongoloid
According to Ashley Montagu who taught anthropology at Princeton University, "The Mongoloid skull has proceeded further than in any other people".[55] "The Mongoloid skull, whether Chinese or Japanese, has been rather more neotenized than the Caucasoid or European".[55] "The female skull, it will be noted, is more pedomorphic in all human populations than the male skull".[55] In Ashley Montagu's
list of "[n]eotenous structural traits in which Mongoloids... differ
from Caucasoids", Montagu lists "Larger brain, larger braincase, broader
skull, broader face, flat roof of the nose, inner eye fold, more
protuberant eyes, lack of brow ridges, greater delicacy of bones, shallow mandibular fossa, small mastoid processes, stocky build, persistence of thymus gland into adult life,
persistence of juvenile form of zygomatic muscle, persistence of
juvenile form of superior lip muscle, later eruption of full dentition
(except second and third molars), less hairy, fewer sweat glands, fewer
hairs per square centimeter [and] long torso".[55]
According to Clive Bromhall who has a Ph.D. in zoology from Oxford University, "Mongoloid races are explained in terms of being the most extreme pedomorphic humans".[56]
Richard Grossinger, professor of anthropology at University of Maine at Portland, said "The intuition that advanced human development was pedomorphic rather than recapitulationary and accelerated was disturbing to many Eurocentric nineteenth century anthropologists".[57] "If juvenilization was the characteristic for advanced status, then it was clear that the Mongoloid races were more deeply fetalized in most respects and thus capable of the greatest development".[57]
According to Clive Bromhall who has a Ph.D. in zoology from Oxford University, "Mongoloid races are explained in terms of being the most extreme pedomorphic humans".[56]
Richard Grossinger, professor of anthropology at University of Maine at Portland, said "The intuition that advanced human development was pedomorphic rather than recapitulationary and accelerated was disturbing to many Eurocentric nineteenth century anthropologists".[57] "If juvenilization was the characteristic for advanced status, then it was clear that the Mongoloid races were more deeply fetalized in most respects and thus capable of the greatest development".[57]
past jewish overrepresentation in science myth jew indian chinese asians
"but Jews were overrepresented in science faculties!"
Yeah, they were overrepresented, because Jews were predominantly urban, and White people during those days didn't go to university (less than 5%) and worked mostly in the manufacturing and farming sectors. Not to mention that Ashkenazi Jews were German, and Germany is where modern science was born. These days because the Chinese and Indians completely buttfuck them in school and a large portion of Whites try to complete a bachelor degree, they only study in finance, law and business.
Yeah, they were overrepresented, because Jews were predominantly urban, and White people during those days didn't go to university (less than 5%) and worked mostly in the manufacturing and farming sectors. Not to mention that Ashkenazi Jews were German, and Germany is where modern science was born. These days because the Chinese and Indians completely buttfuck them in school and a large portion of Whites try to complete a bachelor degree, they only study in finance, law and business.
overrepresented IQ gifted Asian students
In a plenary address at the annual Congress of the American National Association for Gifted Children in November 1985, Sternberg reported that the number of students of Asian background in American programmes for gifted children exceeded the normative expectations from population figures by a factor of five. Entrance to programmes for gifted children in the U.S. is usually set at a level to accommodate moderately gifted children rather than the highly or exceptionally gifted; thus an interesting pattern seems to be developing an over-representation of Asian children by a factor of five in the population of moderately gifted students and by a considerably greater factor-15 or over among the exceptionally gifted. A student has to be extremely gifted mathematically to score more than 700 on the SAT-M by the age of 13; only 4 per cent of college-bound 17 and 18 year olds in the U.S. attain such a score!
Asians have higher standard deviation
http://infoproc.blogspot.se/2008/06/asian-white-iq-variance-from-pisa.html
higher standard deviation in PISA
The fact is there have been absolutely no evidence to show that asians have a lower standard deviation and if anything have been shown to have a higher one. This can be shown by SAT scores where the average gap is asians/pacific islander scoring about 10 points above whites. But asians also had a higher standard deviation at 123 compared to whites at 100. So when you took at the 99th percentile of both groups, which is people scoring about 1500 or so, the gap increases to about 100 points asians over whites. So it seems that not only do asians have a higher mean average but also have more intelligent people on the far end of the spectrum.
Here is the source. Go to table 4-1.
http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2003/pdf/2003_TOTALGRP_PRD.pdf
This is related to the stereotype that the Asian population is monolithic and genetically homogeneous, and lacking in diversity. Although the stereotype of Asian intelligence exists in the public consciousness and popular culture, it is also promoted as propaganda on Web forums and websites by White supremacist groups. White supremacists promote the idea that Asians have little variation in intelligence compared to whites in order to "prove" that Whites are better than Asians by rote of having more White geniuses than Asian geniuses. [47]
There stereotype is also based on the fact that China had no industrial revolution and scientific revolution despite the wealth, prosperity, stability and technological superiority it has in the 1600s. Some believe that Asian countries did not have enough Asians geniuses for innovation [48] (although many "geniuses" have low IQ. For instance, the Nobel Prize Laureates, Richard Feynman and Francis Crick have an IQ of 'only' 125 [23] and 115 [24] respectively). One study has shown that the reason that there was no industrial revolution was because of the high level equilibrium trap [25] [26]. Also, the type of government did not encourage inventions. [27] Social and cultural factors might have prevented the onset of an industrial revolution. [28] Furthermore, Eurocentrism in textbooks mentioned only the Europeans that contributed to society, and skipped the contributers from foreign continents.
Nevertheless, some studies have shown that the population of East Asians in the United States actually have a higher standard deviation (sd=15, mean=106) in IQ than Whites in the United States (sd=14.7, mean=101.4), in a normally distributed WAIS IQ test (standard deviation=15, mean/median/mode=100). [29]
"More specifically if the threshold for entry into gifted education were set at IQ 125, the ratio of Blacks to Whites in representative samples would hover around 1:30, and for Hispanics 1:5. Asians would tend to be overrepresented above this IQ level by 2:1."–Linda Gottfredson
"In the U.S., Whites have an IQ of 101.4 with a standard deviation of 14.7 and Asians have an IQ of 106 with a standard deviation of 15."
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2004desegregatingGiftedEducation.pdf
To illustrate this point: in a normal population with a mean IQ of 100, and a standard deviation of 15, 228 children in every 10,000 would have an IQ score two standard deviations above the mean, that is, a score of IQ 130 or higher. However, with a mean shift upwards of half a standard deviation, as reported by Jensen for Asian Americans, no fewer than 668 children in 10,000 would score in the IQ 130+ range. Many American gifted programmes which employ an IQ criterion for entrance set their entry level at IQ 130; in this situation, 6.68 per cent of Asian children would be eligible to enter these programmes on the basis of IQ as opposed to only 2.28 per cent of Caucasian children-an overrepresentation by a factor of 2.93. Yet Sternberg reports an overrepresentation by a factor of 5! Why do American gifted programmes contain almost twice the number of Asians than could be statistically expected from Jensen's projections. The children of this study have scored at or above IQ 160 on the Standford-Binet Intelligence Test L-M, an instrument with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation fo 16. Thus these children score at least 3.75 standard deviations above the mean. Fewer than 9 children in 100,000 score at or beyond this level. However, if we shift the mean upwards by 0.5 of a standard deviation, to investigate the implications of Jensen's findings and if we assume the standard deviation for the Asian population to be the same as that for non-Asians, then the criterion score of IQ 160 for entrance to this study becomes only 3.25 standard deviations above the new mean. Beyond this point lie not 9, but 58, children in 100,000. If Jensen's findings regarding a higher Asian mean are correct, and if they hold good for the Asian-Australian population as well as Asian-Americans, then we could expect to find Asian-Australians over-represented in the study by a factor of 6.5. Yet the over-representation actually found id an astonishing 15.6!
higher standard deviation in PISA
The fact is there have been absolutely no evidence to show that asians have a lower standard deviation and if anything have been shown to have a higher one. This can be shown by SAT scores where the average gap is asians/pacific islander scoring about 10 points above whites. But asians also had a higher standard deviation at 123 compared to whites at 100. So when you took at the 99th percentile of both groups, which is people scoring about 1500 or so, the gap increases to about 100 points asians over whites. So it seems that not only do asians have a higher mean average but also have more intelligent people on the far end of the spectrum.
Here is the source. Go to table 4-1.
http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2003/pdf/2003_TOTALGRP_PRD.pdf
This is related to the stereotype that the Asian population is monolithic and genetically homogeneous, and lacking in diversity. Although the stereotype of Asian intelligence exists in the public consciousness and popular culture, it is also promoted as propaganda on Web forums and websites by White supremacist groups. White supremacists promote the idea that Asians have little variation in intelligence compared to whites in order to "prove" that Whites are better than Asians by rote of having more White geniuses than Asian geniuses. [47]
There stereotype is also based on the fact that China had no industrial revolution and scientific revolution despite the wealth, prosperity, stability and technological superiority it has in the 1600s. Some believe that Asian countries did not have enough Asians geniuses for innovation [48] (although many "geniuses" have low IQ. For instance, the Nobel Prize Laureates, Richard Feynman and Francis Crick have an IQ of 'only' 125 [23] and 115 [24] respectively). One study has shown that the reason that there was no industrial revolution was because of the high level equilibrium trap [25] [26]. Also, the type of government did not encourage inventions. [27] Social and cultural factors might have prevented the onset of an industrial revolution. [28] Furthermore, Eurocentrism in textbooks mentioned only the Europeans that contributed to society, and skipped the contributers from foreign continents.
Nevertheless, some studies have shown that the population of East Asians in the United States actually have a higher standard deviation (sd=15, mean=106) in IQ than Whites in the United States (sd=14.7, mean=101.4), in a normally distributed WAIS IQ test (standard deviation=15, mean/median/mode=100). [29]
"More specifically if the threshold for entry into gifted education were set at IQ 125, the ratio of Blacks to Whites in representative samples would hover around 1:30, and for Hispanics 1:5. Asians would tend to be overrepresented above this IQ level by 2:1."–Linda Gottfredson
"In the U.S., Whites have an IQ of 101.4 with a standard deviation of 14.7 and Asians have an IQ of 106 with a standard deviation of 15."
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2004desegregatingGiftedEducation.pdf
To illustrate this point: in a normal population with a mean IQ of 100, and a standard deviation of 15, 228 children in every 10,000 would have an IQ score two standard deviations above the mean, that is, a score of IQ 130 or higher. However, with a mean shift upwards of half a standard deviation, as reported by Jensen for Asian Americans, no fewer than 668 children in 10,000 would score in the IQ 130+ range. Many American gifted programmes which employ an IQ criterion for entrance set their entry level at IQ 130; in this situation, 6.68 per cent of Asian children would be eligible to enter these programmes on the basis of IQ as opposed to only 2.28 per cent of Caucasian children-an overrepresentation by a factor of 2.93. Yet Sternberg reports an overrepresentation by a factor of 5! Why do American gifted programmes contain almost twice the number of Asians than could be statistically expected from Jensen's projections. The children of this study have scored at or above IQ 160 on the Standford-Binet Intelligence Test L-M, an instrument with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation fo 16. Thus these children score at least 3.75 standard deviations above the mean. Fewer than 9 children in 100,000 score at or beyond this level. However, if we shift the mean upwards by 0.5 of a standard deviation, to investigate the implications of Jensen's findings and if we assume the standard deviation for the Asian population to be the same as that for non-Asians, then the criterion score of IQ 160 for entrance to this study becomes only 3.25 standard deviations above the new mean. Beyond this point lie not 9, but 58, children in 100,000. If Jensen's findings regarding a higher Asian mean are correct, and if they hold good for the Asian-Australian population as well as Asian-Americans, then we could expect to find Asian-Australians over-represented in the study by a factor of 6.5. Yet the over-representation actually found id an astonishing 15.6!
self-motivated asian students
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGkpd1P3EF8&feature=player_detailpage#t=36
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=WpS2JJYfbZ8#t=23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn4HRDBSuTw&feature=player_detailpage#t=900
"where does this pressure to study come from, does it come from you, your teachers, your parents, society?
it comes from me.
are you worried about your future?
yes, i am really worried. it is difficult for me to imagine how hard my life will be if i don't study hard."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=WpS2JJYfbZ8#t=23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn4HRDBSuTw&feature=player_detailpage#t=900
"where does this pressure to study come from, does it come from you, your teachers, your parents, society?
it comes from me.
are you worried about your future?
yes, i am really worried. it is difficult for me to imagine how hard my life will be if i don't study hard."
japan historical revisionism?
>>1101 (OP)
On the matter of Japanese historical revisionism, the Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact as published some books in English:
The Nanking Hoax: A Historian Analyzes the Events of 1937:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/67_S4.pdf
>Through his thorough research on Nanking incident for nearly 30 years, he saw a parade of characters marching through history: those who made the accusations, those who publicized them, those who used them to their advantage, those who were manipulated by them — Chinese, Americans, Japanese. So many people have participated in this drama in so many ways. Why were such accusations made? How were they disseminated throughout the world? Why were they given credence at the Tokyo Trials? How did the Japanese react to them? When did the Republic of China first make those allegations? This book answers those questions.
Analyzing The 'Photographic Evidence' of The Nanking Massacre:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/26_S4.pdf
>143 photos, which are commonly used as evidence of the Nanking massacre, have been scientifically analyzed. The conclusion is really surprising. There is not a single photo among the 143 can support the massacre. The main source of most of these photos proved to be books published by the propaganda arm of Chinese Nationalists. They were either produced by the Nationalist’s stadium, concocted from various photos, just commercial photos with ill captions and even photos from Japanese books with miscaptions. These facts are fully verified by this book.
What Really Happened in Nanking:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/7_S4.pdf
>This book discusses the events that took place in Nanking in 1937 from 15 perspectives. The author’s discussions are based on primary sources (Japanese, Chinese and Western historical documents and eyewitness accounts), which include population stat istics, burial records, International Committee records, an official military report prepared by Chinese Gen. He Yingqin. Mr. Tanaka concludes that th ere was no massacre in Nanking. He also exposes the fakery behind the photographs used in Iris Chang's The Rape of Nanking, which are in sharp contrast with a contemporaneous photographic news series published in the Asahi Shimbun newspaper.
The Nanking Massacre: Fact Versus Fiction:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/9_S4.pdf
>This book is a research work intended to unearth and reveal the truth about the events that transp ired in Nanking on December 13, 1937, when Japanese invaded Nanking, and thereafter. Its conclusions were reached via the painstaking examination and reexamination of primary sources, which yielded information that resolves most of the issues currently under debate, and show that the “Nanking Massacre” is a product of wartime and postwar propaganda. Without the benefit of this book, an understanding of the facts about Nanking is not possible.
Dissentient Judgement of Pal:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/65_S4.pdf
>Radhabinod Pal was one of the judges at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (the “Tokyo Trials”) held in Japan in 1946 to judge those Japanese officials and officers charged by the Allies as Class-A War Criminals. Pal, unlike his colleagues on the bench, was a specialist in international law. Unlike his colleagues, Pal questioned the very legitimacy of the trial itself, and found himself forced to conclude, “I would hold that each and everyone of the accused must be found not guilty of each and everyone of the charges in the indictment and should be acquitted of all those charges.”
On the matter of Japanese historical revisionism, the Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact as published some books in English:
The Nanking Hoax: A Historian Analyzes the Events of 1937:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/67_S4.pdf
>Through his thorough research on Nanking incident for nearly 30 years, he saw a parade of characters marching through history: those who made the accusations, those who publicized them, those who used them to their advantage, those who were manipulated by them — Chinese, Americans, Japanese. So many people have participated in this drama in so many ways. Why were such accusations made? How were they disseminated throughout the world? Why were they given credence at the Tokyo Trials? How did the Japanese react to them? When did the Republic of China first make those allegations? This book answers those questions.
Analyzing The 'Photographic Evidence' of The Nanking Massacre:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/26_S4.pdf
>143 photos, which are commonly used as evidence of the Nanking massacre, have been scientifically analyzed. The conclusion is really surprising. There is not a single photo among the 143 can support the massacre. The main source of most of these photos proved to be books published by the propaganda arm of Chinese Nationalists. They were either produced by the Nationalist’s stadium, concocted from various photos, just commercial photos with ill captions and even photos from Japanese books with miscaptions. These facts are fully verified by this book.
What Really Happened in Nanking:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/7_S4.pdf
>This book discusses the events that took place in Nanking in 1937 from 15 perspectives. The author’s discussions are based on primary sources (Japanese, Chinese and Western historical documents and eyewitness accounts), which include population stat istics, burial records, International Committee records, an official military report prepared by Chinese Gen. He Yingqin. Mr. Tanaka concludes that th ere was no massacre in Nanking. He also exposes the fakery behind the photographs used in Iris Chang's The Rape of Nanking, which are in sharp contrast with a contemporaneous photographic news series published in the Asahi Shimbun newspaper.
The Nanking Massacre: Fact Versus Fiction:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/9_S4.pdf
>This book is a research work intended to unearth and reveal the truth about the events that transp ired in Nanking on December 13, 1937, when Japanese invaded Nanking, and thereafter. Its conclusions were reached via the painstaking examination and reexamination of primary sources, which yielded information that resolves most of the issues currently under debate, and show that the “Nanking Massacre” is a product of wartime and postwar propaganda. Without the benefit of this book, an understanding of the facts about Nanking is not possible.
Dissentient Judgement of Pal:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/65_S4.pdf
>Radhabinod Pal was one of the judges at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (the “Tokyo Trials”) held in Japan in 1946 to judge those Japanese officials and officers charged by the Allies as Class-A War Criminals. Pal, unlike his colleagues on the bench, was a specialist in international law. Unlike his colleagues, Pal questioned the very legitimacy of the trial itself, and found himself forced to conclude, “I would hold that each and everyone of the accused must be found not guilty of each and everyone of the charges in the indictment and should be acquitted of all those charges.”
>>1119
The Tokyo Trials and the Truth of “Pal’s Judgment”:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/63_S4.pdf
>Radhabinod Pal was one of the judges at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (the “Tokyo Trials”) held in Japan in 1946 to judge those Japanese officials and officers charged by the Allies as Class-A War Criminals. Pal, unlike his colleagues on the bench, was a specialist in international law. Unlike his colleagues, Pal questioned the very legitimacy of the trial itself, and found himself forced to conclude, “I would hold that each and everyone of the accused must be found not guilty of each and everyone of the charges in the indictment and should be acquitted of all those charges.”
>Prof. Watanabe eloquently demonstrates the truth of Pal’s observation and the rightness of his position in his book The Toyo Trials and the Truth of “Pal’s Judgment.”
The Tokyo Trials: The Unheard Defense:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/66_S4.pdf
>This book consist of excerpts from a body of documents compiled published under the title Defense Evidence Rejected by the Tokyo Trials, which encompasses eight volumes and 5,500 pages. The fact that such enormous volume of evidence were rejected itself would show the true nature of the Tokyo Trials. As an introduction, Dr. Kobori summarizes legal basis for the Tokyo Trials, how the trial progressed and how evidence was treated there.
Behind The Comfort Women Controversy: How Lies Became Truth:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/39_S4.pdf
>The comfort women controversy erupted in the 1990s when Japanese military authorities were accused of having abducted or otherwise coerced women into becoming “sex slaves.” Since then, a great deal of research has been done on the subject, all of which indicates that the accusations are false.
>But the flames of the controversy were reignited, this time in the United States. July 30, 2007 marks an inexplicable event: approval of a U.S. House of Representatives resolution condemning Japan.
>Who is behind these malicious campaigns, and what motivates them? And exactly what is at the heart of the comfort women controversy?
>The truth is at hand, thanks to Japan-Korea relations specialist Nishioka Tsutomu, who has struggled with this controversy since its inception, and who answers these questions, once and for all.
A New Look at the Annexation of Korea:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/89_S4.pdf
>Every year at this season, the Korean government demands that Japan apologize for her annexation of Korea. This year South Korea breached propriety with President Lee Myung-bak's demand for an apology from the Japanese Emperor himself.
>However, if one looks at the historical facts regarding the annexation of Korea, one will be puzzled as to why the Korean government makes such a demand.
>For example, the total budget of the Korean government for 1911 was 3.6 million yen, of which 1.3 million yen consisted of tax revenue from the Korean people. Obviously, the balance was supplemented by the Japanese. In other words, the Korean government was on the verge of bankruptcy. The truth was that Japan saved Korea from a financial crisis. Furthermore, Japanese financial assistance continued up to 1939, when the Japanese supplemented 25% of the total budge.
>This book is filled with previously neglected historical facts, photos and figures.
As far as Japanese nationalist & fascist philosophy is concerned, I doubt you will have much luck finding fully translated books in English. The best you can probably do on that front is glean summaries from critical historians of the Japanese WWII period… or just learn the damn the language if you have the time, the ability and the will-power to do that.
The Tokyo Trials and the Truth of “Pal’s Judgment”:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/63_S4.pdf
>Radhabinod Pal was one of the judges at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (the “Tokyo Trials”) held in Japan in 1946 to judge those Japanese officials and officers charged by the Allies as Class-A War Criminals. Pal, unlike his colleagues on the bench, was a specialist in international law. Unlike his colleagues, Pal questioned the very legitimacy of the trial itself, and found himself forced to conclude, “I would hold that each and everyone of the accused must be found not guilty of each and everyone of the charges in the indictment and should be acquitted of all those charges.”
>Prof. Watanabe eloquently demonstrates the truth of Pal’s observation and the rightness of his position in his book The Toyo Trials and the Truth of “Pal’s Judgment.”
The Tokyo Trials: The Unheard Defense:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/66_S4.pdf
>This book consist of excerpts from a body of documents compiled published under the title Defense Evidence Rejected by the Tokyo Trials, which encompasses eight volumes and 5,500 pages. The fact that such enormous volume of evidence were rejected itself would show the true nature of the Tokyo Trials. As an introduction, Dr. Kobori summarizes legal basis for the Tokyo Trials, how the trial progressed and how evidence was treated there.
Behind The Comfort Women Controversy: How Lies Became Truth:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/39_S4.pdf
>The comfort women controversy erupted in the 1990s when Japanese military authorities were accused of having abducted or otherwise coerced women into becoming “sex slaves.” Since then, a great deal of research has been done on the subject, all of which indicates that the accusations are false.
>But the flames of the controversy were reignited, this time in the United States. July 30, 2007 marks an inexplicable event: approval of a U.S. House of Representatives resolution condemning Japan.
>Who is behind these malicious campaigns, and what motivates them? And exactly what is at the heart of the comfort women controversy?
>The truth is at hand, thanks to Japan-Korea relations specialist Nishioka Tsutomu, who has struggled with this controversy since its inception, and who answers these questions, once and for all.
A New Look at the Annexation of Korea:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/89_S4.pdf
>Every year at this season, the Korean government demands that Japan apologize for her annexation of Korea. This year South Korea breached propriety with President Lee Myung-bak's demand for an apology from the Japanese Emperor himself.
>However, if one looks at the historical facts regarding the annexation of Korea, one will be puzzled as to why the Korean government makes such a demand.
>For example, the total budget of the Korean government for 1911 was 3.6 million yen, of which 1.3 million yen consisted of tax revenue from the Korean people. Obviously, the balance was supplemented by the Japanese. In other words, the Korean government was on the verge of bankruptcy. The truth was that Japan saved Korea from a financial crisis. Furthermore, Japanese financial assistance continued up to 1939, when the Japanese supplemented 25% of the total budge.
>This book is filled with previously neglected historical facts, photos and figures.
As far as Japanese nationalist & fascist philosophy is concerned, I doubt you will have much luck finding fully translated books in English. The best you can probably do on that front is glean summaries from critical historians of the Japanese WWII period… or just learn the damn the language if you have the time, the ability and the will-power to do that.
anime
Gasaraki
Shigurui
Ghost in the Shell
Guin Saga
Berserk
Parasyte
Baby Steps
Nodame Cantabile
Gintama
Neon Evangelion Genesis
Wolf Rain
Ergo Proxy
Major
Cowboy Bebop
Sidonia no Kishi
Legend of Galactic Heroes
Texhnolyze
Witch Hunter Robin
Blue Gender
RahXephon
Eureka Seven
Attack On Titans
Gantz
Btooom!
Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso
Hajime no Ippo
Mushishi
GTO
Kingdom
Sakamichi no Apollon
Shigurui
Ghost in the Shell
Guin Saga
Berserk
Parasyte
Baby Steps
Nodame Cantabile
Gintama
Neon Evangelion Genesis
Wolf Rain
Ergo Proxy
Major
Cowboy Bebop
Sidonia no Kishi
Legend of Galactic Heroes
Texhnolyze
Witch Hunter Robin
Blue Gender
RahXephon
Eureka Seven
Attack On Titans
Gantz
Btooom!
Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso
Hajime no Ippo
Mushishi
GTO
Kingdom
Sakamichi no Apollon
MUSICAL composer asian creativity MUSIC competition composition
>>1695708
http://www.goldenkeyfestival.com/composition_winners.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2QqavnYVfU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX-G86arbt4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CZfx1gJmcU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qT7y31Gmvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16lHAVPuInY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiN1SvWVXu8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs31FzaPJDY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pN-aqj6-miU
http://www.goldenkeyfestival.com/composition_winners.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2QqavnYVfU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX-G86arbt4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CZfx1gJmcU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qT7y31Gmvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16lHAVPuInY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiN1SvWVXu8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs31FzaPJDY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pN-aqj6-miU
asian composers good music
those european composers are dead, idiot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Elisabeth_Music_Competition#Composition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Elisabeth_Music_Competition#Composition
refutation for stormfront faggots on 4chan
>be an island nation
>economic competitioned lead people to discover large mass of land
>exploit it thanks to natural island people naval advantage
>obtain lead in industrial and technology
>hurr our people the smartest
surgery taiwan plastic fake ads
http://en.rocketnews24.com/2012/05/17/thinking-about-plastic-surgery-this-ad-may-make-you-laugh-or-it-could-make-you-think-twice/
response to low average number of citation science asia
Well, you're an idiot. Because there are factors like the language in which it was first published, social network, lack of international collaboration and the size of the country's scientific community that can impact the average number of citation per paper, because the best papers can get up to 40,000 citations, a difference of 10 is quite meaningless. In fact, China was 4th in the number of papers that were in the top 1% most cited in 2011.
Other factors such as the importance of seniority, lack of funds for fundamental research and lack of autonomy also negatively impact Asian science.
"An analysis of ISI Web of Knowledge data found that China had increased its share of the 1% of most highly cited science articles from 1.85% in 2001 to 11.3% in 2011."
However, in the U.S. and other Western countries, Asian scientists are overwhelmingly overrepresented in the top over-achieving scientists.
"Indicative of the future, the foreign-born made up over half of doctorate scientists and engineers under the age of 45 in 2000 and 57 percent of post-doctorate workers. Nearly 60 percent of the growth in the number of PhD scientists and engineers in the country in the 1990s came from the foreign-born."
"Scientists and engineers making exceptional contributions to the physical sciences. Regardless of benchmark date or indicator, we find the foreign-born to be disproportionately represented among those making exceptional contributions in the physical sciences (Table 6). For example, more than half (55.6%) of the outstanding authors in the physical sciences are foreign-born compared to just 20.4% of physical scientists in the scientific labor force as of 1980 (Table 1). We also find that the foreign-educated are disproportionately represented for a number of the indicators = among the most-cited and outstanding authors, as well as first authors of hot papers."
Other factors such as the importance of seniority, lack of funds for fundamental research and lack of autonomy also negatively impact Asian science.
"An analysis of ISI Web of Knowledge data found that China had increased its share of the 1% of most highly cited science articles from 1.85% in 2001 to 11.3% in 2011."
However, in the U.S. and other Western countries, Asian scientists are overwhelmingly overrepresented in the top over-achieving scientists.
"Indicative of the future, the foreign-born made up over half of doctorate scientists and engineers under the age of 45 in 2000 and 57 percent of post-doctorate workers. Nearly 60 percent of the growth in the number of PhD scientists and engineers in the country in the 1990s came from the foreign-born."
"Scientists and engineers making exceptional contributions to the physical sciences. Regardless of benchmark date or indicator, we find the foreign-born to be disproportionately represented among those making exceptional contributions in the physical sciences (Table 6). For example, more than half (55.6%) of the outstanding authors in the physical sciences are foreign-born compared to just 20.4% of physical scientists in the scientific labor force as of 1980 (Table 1). We also find that the foreign-educated are disproportionately represented for a number of the indicators = among the most-cited and outstanding authors, as well as first authors of hot papers."
asian wiz kids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kXncqIz-OI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQ5WYN22YG0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEPa71qCza8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1g4PM1T50I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6rdZbUTGNE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxmvweTvjrU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwh-_87a6_A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6z63dqeU_E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6xdnDE4NpA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyLklppXCBw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNtJquRf-uk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OntiXRsuOY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LKrW5BST5w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPZn9We_rog&feature=player_detailpage#t=98
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQ5WYN22YG0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEPa71qCza8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1g4PM1T50I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6rdZbUTGNE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxmvweTvjrU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwh-_87a6_A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6z63dqeU_E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6xdnDE4NpA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyLklppXCBw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNtJquRf-uk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OntiXRsuOY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LKrW5BST5w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPZn9We_rog&feature=player_detailpage#t=98
french documentary eduation korea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn4HRDBSuTw&feature=player_detailpage#t=1089
"80% of the students now go to college, the highest rate in the world."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn4HRDBSuTw&feature=player_detailpage#t=900
"where does this pressure to study come from, does it come from you, your teachers, your parents, society?
it comes from me.
are you worried about your future?
yes, i am really worried. it is difficult for me to imagine how hard my life will be if i don't study hard."
"80% of the students now go to college, the highest rate in the world."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn4HRDBSuTw&feature=player_detailpage#t=900
"where does this pressure to study come from, does it come from you, your teachers, your parents, society?
it comes from me.
are you worried about your future?
yes, i am really worried. it is difficult for me to imagine how hard my life will be if i don't study hard."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)