asians too smart for their own good

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/opinion/asians-too-smart-for-their-own-good.html?_r=0

using gold as a currency (you can't use gold as a currency and make it a reserve currency retard) would mean that there wouldn't be enough money; therefore, the price of goods would decline, jobless rate would increase, because there is less economic transaction due to a lack of currency and money won't be able to be lent at a low rate as "virtual currency" is not gold, making goods that requires a large capital good investment, such as computers and other electronics, much more expensive to produce.

BETA AS FUCK ASIAN MALES

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgoHQJQ1ORY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6XXia5B2Wg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_L0O1VJjh_A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=vug5kMq4nTc

chinese students statistics iq

The proportion of British Chinese achieving 5 or more good GCSE's stood at 70%, where it remained the highest out of all ethnic groups in the UK.

hehhehheh insult collection

and you look like an overfed cattle who didn't end up in the slaughter house once the locals realized you could become a staple tourist attraction in the region

why china never industrialized

>How the hell is this possible that Whites still turned out on top? Not the Jews, mind you, just the average Whites like Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese and of course, Anglo-Saxons. How come they, and not East Asians, colonized the world and at their peak controlled 85% of the world's land area? How come it was non-Jewish Whites who put a man on the moon, invented the car, the airplane, the electric battery and a whole lot of other stuff? If we assume the standard deviations to be equal or to be higher for East Asians, none of this will make sense anymore.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t3QSGRN1-U&t=88m30s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23xq5vEOyf4&t=664s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=14m01s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=36m50s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-eehcES3U&t=5m19s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pw1MEyT-qU&t=5m03s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMYz2AHwEzo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHyspkeyIfs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7deJXU4ZRG0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DJkE3zh6RE&t=23m02s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfVn5X6gi9s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvvOCdTyPgo


 GREED

/watch?v=-t3QSGRN1-U&t=88m30s
/watch?v=23xq5vEOyf4&t=664s
/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=14m01s
/watch?v=qjH9lsgkqR4&t=36m50s
/watch?v=y4-eehcES3U&t=5m19s
/watch?v=6Pw1MEyT-qU&t=5m03s
/watch?v=BMYz2AHwEzo
/watch?v=QHyspkeyIfs
/watch?v=7deJXU4ZRG0
/watch?v=_DJkE3zh6RE&t=23m02s

An article in the American Journal of Human Genetics by researchers in Brazil argued against the Solutrean hypothesis. "Our results strongly support the hypothesis that haplogroup X, together with the other four main mtDNA haplogroups, was part of the gene pool of a single Native American founding population; therefore they do not support models that propose haplogroup-independent migrations, such as the migration from Europe posed by the Solutrean hypothesis."[6] In a 2011 article in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, researchers in Italy reported that "Our findings have also a second important implication. Taking into account that C4c is deeply rooted in the Asian portion of the mtDNA phylogeny and is indubitably of Asian origin, a scenario in which C4c and X2a are characterized by parallel genetic histories definitively dismisses the controversial Solutrean hypothesis of an Atlantic glacial entry route into North America for X2a (Stanford and Bradley, 2004; Straus et al., 2005)."[7] To further investigate the mystery of the Kennewick man and determine whether the skeleton belonged to the Umatilla Native American tribe, an extraction of DNA was analyzed, and according to the report of the scientists doing the DNA analysis: "available technology and protocols do not allow the analysis of ancient DNA from these remains."[9] Anthropologist Joseph Powell of the University of New Mexico was also allowed to examine the remains and his conclusions were contradictory. Powell used craniometric data obtained by anthropologist William White Howells of Harvard University and anthropologist Tsunehiko Hanihara (Japanese:埴原恒彦) of Saga University that had the advantage of including data drawn from Asian and North American populations.[10] Powell said that Kennewick Man was not European but most resembled the Ainu[6] and Polynesians.[10] Powell said that the Ainu descend from the Jōmon people who are an East Asian population with "closest biological affinity with south-east Asians rather than western Eurasian peoples".[11] Furthermore, Powell said that dental analysis showed the skull had a 94 percent chance of being a Sundadont group like the Ainu and Polynesians and only a 48 percent chance of being a Sinodont group like that of North Asia.[10] Powell said analysis of the skull showed it to be "unlike American Indians and Europeans".[10] Powell concluded that Kennewick man "is clearly not a Caucasoid unless Ainu and Polynesians are considered Caucasoid."[11]